This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.63 release. There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Sep 2021 12:54:40 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.63-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.63-rc1
Pavel Skripkin paskripkin@gmail.com media: stkwebcam: fix memory leak in stk_camera_probe
Amir Goldstein amir73il@gmail.com fuse: fix illegal access to inode with reused nodeid
Al Viro viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk new helper: inode_wrong_type()
Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com spi: Switch to signed types for *_native_cs SPI controller fields
Vignesh Raghavendra vigneshr@ti.com serial: 8250: 8250_omap: Fix possible array out of bounds access
Zubin Mithra zsm@chromium.org ALSA: pcm: fix divide error in snd_pcm_lib_ioctl
Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de ALSA: hda/realtek: Workaround for conflicting SSID on ASUS ROG Strix G17
Johnathon Clark john.clark@cantab.net ALSA: hda/realtek: Quirk for HP Spectre x360 14 amp setup
Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de cryptoloop: add a deprecation warning
Kim Phillips kim.phillips@amd.com perf/x86/amd/power: Assign pmu.module
Kim Phillips kim.phillips@amd.com perf/x86/amd/ibs: Work around erratum #1197
Tuo Li islituo@gmail.com ceph: fix possible null-pointer dereference in ceph_mdsmap_decode()
Xiaoyao Li xiaoyao.li@intel.com perf/x86/intel/pt: Fix mask of num_address_ranges
Shai Malin smalin@marvell.com qede: Fix memset corruption
Harini Katakam harini.katakam@xilinx.com net: macb: Add a NULL check on desc_ptp
Shai Malin smalin@marvell.com qed: Fix the VF msix vectors flow
Sai Krishna Potthuri lakshmi.sai.krishna.potthuri@xilinx.com reset: reset-zynqmp: Fixed the argument data type
Krzysztof Hałasa khalasa@piap.pl gpu: ipu-v3: Fix i.MX IPU-v3 offset calculations for (semi)planar U/V formats
Maciej Falkowski maciej.falkowski9@gmail.com ARM: OMAP1: ams-delta: remove unused function ams_delta_camera_power
Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org xtensa: fix kconfig unmet dependency warning for HAVE_FUTEX_CMPXCHG
Matthieu Baerts matthieu.baerts@tessares.net static_call: Fix unused variable warn w/o MODULE
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Revert "Add a reference to ucounts for each cred"
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Revert "cred: add missing return error code when set_cred_ucounts() failed"
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Revert "ucounts: Increase ucounts reference counter before the security hook"
Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com ubifs: report correct st_size for encrypted symlinks
Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com f2fs: report correct st_size for encrypted symlinks
Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com ext4: report correct st_size for encrypted symlinks
Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com fscrypt: add fscrypt_symlink_getattr() for computing st_size
Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu ext4: fix race writing to an inline_data file while its xattrs are changing
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +-- arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-ams-delta.c | 14 --------- arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c | 8 +++++ arch/x86/events/amd/power.c | 1 + arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c | 2 +- arch/xtensa/Kconfig | 2 +- drivers/block/Kconfig | 4 +-- drivers/block/cryptoloop.c | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-cpmem.c | 30 +++++++++---------- drivers/media/usb/stkwebcam/stk-webcam.c | 6 ++-- drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_ptp.c | 11 ++++++- drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_main.c | 7 ++++- drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c | 2 +- drivers/reset/reset-zynqmp.c | 3 +- drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c | 1 + fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 4 +-- fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c | 4 +-- fs/ceph/mdsmap.c | 8 +++-- fs/cifs/inode.c | 5 ++-- fs/crypto/hooks.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/exec.c | 4 --- fs/ext4/inline.c | 6 ++++ fs/ext4/symlink.c | 11 ++++++- fs/f2fs/namei.c | 11 ++++++- fs/fuse/dir.c | 6 ++-- fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 7 +++++ fs/fuse/inode.c | 4 +-- fs/fuse/readdir.c | 7 +++-- fs/nfs/inode.c | 6 ++-- fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c | 2 +- fs/overlayfs/namei.c | 4 +-- fs/ubifs/file.c | 12 +++++++- include/linux/cred.h | 2 -- include/linux/fs.h | 5 ++++ include/linux/fscrypt.h | 7 +++++ include/linux/spi/spi.h | 4 +-- include/linux/user_namespace.h | 4 --- kernel/cred.c | 41 -------------------------- kernel/fork.c | 6 ---- kernel/static_call.c | 4 +-- kernel/sys.c | 12 -------- kernel/ucount.c | 40 ++----------------------- kernel/user_namespace.c | 3 -- sound/core/pcm_lib.c | 2 +- sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c | 11 +++++++ 45 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 181 deletions(-)
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.63 release. There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On Mon, 6 Sep 2021 14:55:15 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.63 release. There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Sep 2021 12:54:40 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.63-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
5.10.63-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen foxhlchen@gmail.com
On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 18:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.63 release. There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Sep 2021 12:54:40 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.63-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.63-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: 49a2bcaf11be252cfbbd47ef9d1c3861b0a3ea95 * git describe: v5.10.62-30-g49a2bcaf11be * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## No regressions (compared to v5.10.62)
## No fixes (compared to v5.10.62)
## Test result summary total: 88715, pass: 74649, fail: 534, skip: 12601, xfail: 931
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 289 total, 289 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 51 total, 51 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 36 total, 35 passed, 1 failed * riscv: 30 total, 30 passed, 0 failed * s390: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On 2021/9/6 20:55, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.63 release. There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Sep 2021 12:54:40 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.63-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.63-rc1,
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.63-rc1 Commit: 49a2bcaf11be252cfbbd47ef9d1c3861b0a3ea95 Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 8907 passed: 8907 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
x86: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 8907 passed: 8907 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot hulkrobot@huawei.com
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 02:55:15PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.63 release. There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Sep 2021 12:54:40 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/99 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/100
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On Mon, 06 Sep 2021 14:55:15 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.63 release. There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Sep 2021 12:54:40 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.63-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.63-rc1-g49a2bcaf11be Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On 9/6/2021 5:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.63 release. There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Sep 2021 12:54:40 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.63-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On 9/6/21 6:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.63 release. There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Sep 2021 12:54:40 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.63-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 02:55:15PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.63 release. There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Sep 2021 12:54:40 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 456 pass: 456 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter