On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 02:29:42PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:

On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 12:38, Bagas Sanjaya bagasdotme@gmail.com wrote:

...

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 05:55:51PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:

...

Following x86 and i386 build regressions noticed on Linux next-20231128 tag.

Build log:

fs/btrfs/super.c: In function 'btrfs_parse_param': fs/btrfs/super.c:416:25: error: 'ret' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'net'? 416 | ret = -EINVAL; | ^~~ | net fs/btrfs/super.c:416:25: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in fs/btrfs/super.c:417:25: error: label 'out' used but not defined 417 | goto out; | ^~~~ make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:243: fs/btrfs/super.o] Error 1

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org

Links:

• https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20231128/tes...

• https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20231128/tes...

• https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2Ymoxor9n54ID51BFjRBS...

• https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2Ymoxor9n54ID51BFjRBS...

Is it W=1 build? I can't reproduce on btrfs tree with CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y and without W=1.

My config did not set this # CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL is not set

OK.

Do you think the system should auto select the above config as default when following config gets enabled ?

CONFIG_BTRFS_FS=m (or) CONFIG_BTRFS_FS=y

Nope, leave it as is.

Thanks.