Hello again,
I've sent this email a few minutes ago but mixed up one of the In-Reply-To message IDs, so I'm resending it now with (hopefully) the correct In-Reply-To message IDs.
I've bisected this and found that the issue is caused by commit f46262bbc05af38565c560fd960b86a0e195fd4b:
'Revert "mm/execmem: Unify early execmem_cache behaviour"'
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/c...
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20250617152521.879529420@linuxfoundation.org/
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree...
Regards Pascal
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 10:31:43PM +0200, Pascal Ernster wrote:
Hello again,
I've sent this email a few minutes ago but mixed up one of the In-Reply-To message IDs, so I'm resending it now with (hopefully) the correct In-Reply-To message IDs.
I've bisected this and found that the issue is caused by commit f46262bbc05af38565c560fd960b86a0e195fd4b:
'Revert "mm/execmem: Unify early execmem_cache behaviour"'
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/c...
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20250617152521.879529420@linuxfoundation.org/
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree...
Thank you for digging into this. Looks like I took the last patch in a patch series and not the previous ones, which caused this problem. I've dropped this one now and will add it back next week after I also add all the other ones in the series.
thanks,
greg k-h
[2025-06-19 06:17] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 10:31:43PM +0200, Pascal Ernster wrote:
Hello again,
I've sent this email a few minutes ago but mixed up one of the In-Reply-To message IDs, so I'm resending it now with (hopefully) the correct In-Reply-To message IDs.
I've bisected this and found that the issue is caused by commit f46262bbc05af38565c560fd960b86a0e195fd4b:
'Revert "mm/execmem: Unify early execmem_cache behaviour"'
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/c...
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20250617152521.879529420@linuxfoundation.org/
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree...
Thank you for digging into this. Looks like I took the last patch in a patch series and not the previous ones, which caused this problem. I've dropped this one now and will add it back next week after I also add all the other ones in the series.
You're welcome! :)
Btw, the same patch has turned up again in the stable queue für 6.15.4:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/log/...
Is this intentional or a mistake?
Regards Pascal
On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 12:09:42AM +0200, Pascal Ernster wrote:
[2025-06-19 06:17] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 10:31:43PM +0200, Pascal Ernster wrote:
Hello again,
I've sent this email a few minutes ago but mixed up one of the In-Reply-To message IDs, so I'm resending it now with (hopefully) the correct In-Reply-To message IDs.
I've bisected this and found that the issue is caused by commit f46262bbc05af38565c560fd960b86a0e195fd4b:
'Revert "mm/execmem: Unify early execmem_cache behaviour"'
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/c...
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20250617152521.879529420@linuxfoundation.org/
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree...
Thank you for digging into this. Looks like I took the last patch in a patch series and not the previous ones, which caused this problem. I've dropped this one now and will add it back next week after I also add all the other ones in the series.
You're welcome! :)
Btw, the same patch has turned up again in the stable queue für 6.15.4:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/log/...
Is this intentional or a mistake?
Intentional, I took the whole series this time, right?
thanks,
greg k-h