This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:53 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.207-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.207-rc1
Alexander Atanasov alexander.atanasov@virtuozzo.com scsi: core: Always send batch on reset or error handling command
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Revert "scsi: core: Add scsi_prot_ref_tag() helper"
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Revert "scsi: core: Introduce scsi_get_sector()"
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Revert "scsi: core: Make scsi_get_lba() return the LBA"
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Revert "scsi: core: Use scsi_cmd_to_rq() instead of scsi_cmnd.request"
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Revert "scsi: core: Use a structure member to track the SCSI command submitter"
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Revert "scsi: core: Always send batch on reset or error handling command"
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++-- drivers/scsi/scsi.c | 2 +- drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++--------------- drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 38 +++++++++++++------------------------- drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c | 18 ++++++++---------- drivers/scsi/scsi_priv.h | 1 - include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h | 29 +++-------------------------- include/scsi/scsi_device.h | 16 +++++++--------- 8 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On 1/11/24 01:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:53 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.207-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli florian.fainelli@broadcom.com
On Jan 11, 2024, at 4:52 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:53 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.207-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
Hi, 5.10.207-rc1 compiled and booted just fine on x86_64, no errors or regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins <srw@sladewatkins.net mailto:srw@sladewatkins.net>
Best, Slade
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 10:52:49AM +0100:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:53 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.207-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
Tested 9d64f2ec9cf9 ("Linux 5.10.207-rc1") on: - arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640) - arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4)
No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests: Tested-by: Dominique Martinet dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com
On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 at 15:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:53 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.207-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.207-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: 9d64f2ec9cf9d1a55dabce3c7f639ec26bd1d7b4 * git describe: v5.10.206-8-g9d64f2ec9cf9 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.206)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.206)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.206)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.206)
## Test result summary total: 99306, pass: 75376, fail: 4061, skip: 19792, xfail: 77
## Build Summary * arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed * arm: 117 total, 117 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 44 total, 44 passed, 0 failed * i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed * mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed * powerpc: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed * s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * boot * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-exec * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs * kselftest-filesystems-epoll * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-ftrace * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-net-forwarding * kselftest-net-mptcp * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-user_events * kselftest-vDSO * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:52:49 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:53 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.207-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 68 tests: 68 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.207-rc1-g9d64f2ec9cf9 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
-
Dominique Martinet -
Florian Fainelli -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Pavel Machek -
Slade Watkins