Hi!

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6...

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de

Best regards, Pavel

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 08:00:42PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Successfully compiled and installed bindeb-pkgs on my computer (Acer Aspire E15, Intel Core i3 Haswell). No noticeable regressions.

Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya bagasdotme@gmail.com

On 10/12/23 11:00 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.58-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos re@w6rz.net

On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 23:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.58 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Oct 2023 18:00:23 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.58-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org

NOTE: Following LTP dio and hugetlb test cases are back to PASS status.

Fixes compared with last release. * bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-dio - dio01 - dio02 - dio03 - dio05 - dio06 - dio07 - dio08 - dio09 - dio11

* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-hugetlb - hugemmap11

## Build * kernel: 6.1.58-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-6.1.y * git commit: 3fe61dd155ac48d1642f5cac17bd41a92ef585b7 * git describe: v6.1.57-7-g3fe61dd155ac * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.57...

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.57)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.57)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.57) * bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-dio - dio01 - dio02 - dio03 - dio05 - dio06 - dio07 - dio08 - dio09 - dio11

* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-hugetlb - hugemmap11

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.57)

## Test result summary total: 114725, pass: 97010, fail: 2320, skip: 15240, xfail: 155

## Build Summary * arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed * arm: 149 total, 149 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 53 total, 52 passed, 1 failed * i386: 41 total, 39 passed, 2 failed * mips: 29 total, 27 passed, 2 failed * parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 38 total, 36 passed, 2 failed * riscv: 16 total, 15 passed, 1 failed * s390: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed * sh: 12 total, 10 passed, 2 failed * sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 46 total, 46 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary * boot * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-exec * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs * kselftest-filesystems-epoll * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-ftrace * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-net-forwarding * kselftest-net-mptcp * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-user_events * kselftest-vDSO * kselftest-vm * kselftest-watchdog * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * v4l2-compliance * v4l2-complianciance

-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org