This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.125 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.125-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.125-rc1
Will Deacon will@kernel.org arm64: mm: Don't invalidate FROM_DEVICE buffers at start of DMA transfer
Lukas Wunner lukas@wunner.de serial: core: Initialize rs485 RTS polarity already on probe
Willy Tarreau w@1wt.eu tcp: drop the hash_32() part from the index calculation
Willy Tarreau w@1wt.eu tcp: increase source port perturb table to 2^16
Willy Tarreau w@1wt.eu tcp: dynamically allocate the perturb table used by source ports
Willy Tarreau w@1wt.eu tcp: add small random increments to the source port
Willy Tarreau w@1wt.eu tcp: use different parts of the port_offset for index and offset
Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com tcp: add some entropy in __inet_hash_connect()
Marian Postevca posteuca@mutex.one usb: gadget: u_ether: fix regression in setting fixed MAC address
Damien Le Moal damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com zonefs: fix zonefs_iomap_begin() for reads
Christian Borntraeger borntraeger@linux.ibm.com s390/mm: use non-quiescing sske for KVM switch to keyed guest
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- arch/arm64/mm/cache.S | 2 - arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c | 2 +- drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 34 +++++-------- drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c | 11 ++++- fs/zonefs/super.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 31 +++++++++--- 7 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.125 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On 6/23/22 09:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.125 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.125-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On 6/23/22 10:44 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.125 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.125-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On 2022/6/24 0:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.125 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.125-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.125-rc1,
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.125-rc1 Commit: 7119d4fdfdd36590d4247bd9dcab4b18fb592de8 Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9094 passed: 9094 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
x86: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9094 passed: 9094 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot hulkrobot@huawei.com
On 23/06/2022 17:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.125 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.125-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
No new regressions for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 75 tests: 74 pass, 1 fail
Linux version: 5.10.125-rc1-g99120abeed34 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Test failures: tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 06:44:33PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.125 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220621): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1380 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1385
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 06:44:33PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.125 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 163 pass: 163 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 at 22:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.125 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.125-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.125-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: 99120abeed34b4814d3c0b4443283075bb65646c * git describe: v5.10.123-96-g99120abeed34 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.123-85-g1432bd558ac0) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.123-85-g1432bd558ac0) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.123-85-g1432bd558ac0) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.123-85-g1432bd558ac0) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 133307, pass: 119577, fail: 254, skip: 12678, xfail: 798
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 314 total, 314 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 58 total, 58 passed, 0 failed * i386: 52 total, 49 passed, 3 failed * mips: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 51 total, 51 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * s390: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 56 total, 55 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance * vdso
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
-
Florian Fainelli -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Pavel Machek -
Samuel Zou -
Shuah Khan -
Sudip Mukherjee