This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.55 release. There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:51:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.55-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.55-rc1
Vasily Averin vvs@virtuozzo.com ipv6: ip6_finish_output2: set sk into newly allocated nskb
Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla@arm.com ARM: dts: versatile: Fix up interrupt controller node names
Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de iomap: remove the length variable in iomap_seek_hole
Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de iomap: remove the length variable in iomap_seek_data
Hyunchul Lee hyc.lee@gmail.com cifs: fix the out of range assignment to bit fields in parse_server_interfaces
Cristian Marussi cristian.marussi@arm.com firmware: arm_scmi: Fix range check for the maximum number of pending messages
Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla@arm.com firmware: arm_scmi: Fix possible scmi_linux_errmap buffer overflow
Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi desmondcheongzx@gmail.com hfs: add lock nesting notation to hfs_find_init
Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi desmondcheongzx@gmail.com hfs: fix high memory mapping in hfs_bnode_read
Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi desmondcheongzx@gmail.com hfs: add missing clean-up in hfs_fill_super
Zheyu Ma zheyuma97@gmail.com drm/ttm: add a check against null pointer dereference
Vasily Averin vvs@virtuozzo.com ipv6: allocate enough headroom in ip6_finish_output2()
Paul E. McKenney paulmck@kernel.org rcu-tasks: Don't delete holdouts within trc_wait_for_one_reader()
Paul E. McKenney paulmck@kernel.org rcu-tasks: Don't delete holdouts within trc_inspect_reader()
Xin Long lucien.xin@gmail.com sctp: move 198 addresses from unusable to private scope
Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com net: annotate data race around sk_ll_usec
Yang Yingliang yangyingliang@huawei.com net/802/garp: fix memleak in garp_request_join()
Yang Yingliang yangyingliang@huawei.com net/802/mrp: fix memleak in mrp_request_join()
Paul Gortmaker paul.gortmaker@windriver.com cgroup1: fix leaked context root causing sporadic NULL deref in LTP
Yang Yingliang yangyingliang@huawei.com workqueue: fix UAF in pwq_unbound_release_workfn()
Miklos Szeredi mszeredi@redhat.com af_unix: fix garbage collect vs MSG_PEEK
Maxim Levitsky mlevitsk@redhat.com KVM: x86: determine if an exception has an error code only when injecting it.
Pavel Begunkov asml.silence@gmail.com io_uring: fix link timeout refs
Yonghong Song yhs@fb.com tools: Allow proper CC/CXX/... override with LLVM=1 in Makefile.include
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +-- arch/arm/boot/dts/versatile-ab.dts | 5 ++-- arch/arm/boot/dts/versatile-pb.dts | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 13 ++++++--- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 12 ++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.c | 3 ++ fs/cifs/smb2ops.c | 4 +-- fs/hfs/bfind.c | 14 ++++++++- fs/hfs/bnode.c | 25 ++++++++++++---- fs/hfs/btree.h | 7 +++++ fs/hfs/super.c | 10 +++---- fs/internal.h | 1 - fs/io_uring.c | 1 - fs/iomap/seek.c | 25 ++++++---------- include/linux/fs_context.h | 1 + include/net/busy_poll.h | 2 +- include/net/sctp/constants.h | 4 +-- kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c | 4 +-- kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 6 ++-- kernel/workqueue.c | 20 ++++++++----- net/802/garp.c | 14 +++++++++ net/802/mrp.c | 14 +++++++++ net/core/sock.c | 2 +- net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++ net/sctp/protocol.c | 3 +- net/unix/af_unix.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- tools/scripts/Makefile.include | 12 ++++++-- 27 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:54:20 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.55 release. There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:51:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.55-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.55-rc1-gdfa33f1e9f64 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.55 release. There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On 7/29/21 7:54 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.55 release. There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:51:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.55-rc1...
Couldn't find this patch. Will checkout the rc instead.
thanks, -- Shuah
On 7/29/21 6:54 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.55 release. There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:51:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.55-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On 7/29/21 7:54 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.55 release. There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:51:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.55-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 04:53:12PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/29/21 7:54 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.55 release. There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:51:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.55-rc1...
Couldn't find this patch. Will checkout the rc instead.
Very odd, this email can not go out unless that is uploaded, I'll dig to see what went wrong...
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 19:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.55 release. There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:51:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.55-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.55-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: dfa33f1e9f64f87f2483e3dd6ff84244281527db * git describe: v5.10.54-25-gdfa33f1e9f64 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## No regressions (compared to v5.10.53-169-gf52d2bc365d2)
## No fixes (compared to v5.10.53-169-gf52d2bc365d2)
## Test result summary total: 84369, pass: 69684, fail: 1624, skip: 11968, xfail: 1093,
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 193 total, 193 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-fcntl[ * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 03:54:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.55 release. There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:51:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210723): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210723): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.1.1 20210723): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 2 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression.
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 03:54:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.55 release. There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:51:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 463 pass: 463 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:54:20 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.55 release. There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:51:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.55-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
5.10.55-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen foxhlchen@gmail.com