This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.20 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.20-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.15.20-rc1
Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com tcp: add missing tcp_skb_can_collapse() test in tcp_shift_skb_data()
Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com af_packet: fix data-race in packet_setsockopt / packet_setsockopt
Sasha Neftin sasha.neftin@intel.com e1000e: Handshake with CSME starts from ADL platforms
Tianchen Ding dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com cpuset: Fix the bug that subpart_cpus updated wrongly in update_cpumask()
Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com rtnetlink: make sure to refresh master_dev/m_ops in __rtnl_newlink()
Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com net: sched: fix use-after-free in tc_new_tfilter()
Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com fanotify: Fix stale file descriptor in copy_event_to_user()
Shyam Sundar S K Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com net: amd-xgbe: Fix skb data length underflow
Raju Rangoju Raju.Rangoju@amd.com net: amd-xgbe: ensure to reset the tx_timer_active flag
Karen Sornek karen.sornek@intel.com i40e: Fix reset path while removing the driver
Jedrzej Jagielski jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com i40e: Fix reset bw limit when DCB enabled with 1 TC
Georgi Valkov gvalkov@abv.bg ipheth: fix EOVERFLOW in ipheth_rcvbulk_callback
Maor Dickman maord@nvidia.com net/mlx5: E-Switch, Fix uninitialized variable modact
Roi Dayan roid@nvidia.com net/mlx5: Bridge, Fix devlink deadlock on net namespace deletion
Maxim Mikityanskiy maximmi@nvidia.com net/mlx5e: Don't treat small ceil values as unlimited in HTB offload
Dima Chumak dchumak@nvidia.com net/mlx5: Fix offloading with ESWITCH_IPV4_TTL_MODIFY_ENABLE
Gal Pressman gal@nvidia.com net/mlx5e: Fix module EEPROM query
Maher Sanalla msanalla@nvidia.com net/mlx5: Use del_timer_sync in fw reset flow of halting poll
Maor Dickman maord@nvidia.com net/mlx5e: Fix handling of wrong devices during bond netevent
Vlad Buslov vladbu@nvidia.com net/mlx5: Bridge, ensure dev_name is null-terminated
Vlad Buslov vladbu@nvidia.com net/mlx5: Bridge, take rtnl lock in init error handler
Raed Salem raeds@nvidia.com net/mlx5e: IPsec: Fix tunnel mode crypto offload for non TCP/UDP traffic
J. Bruce Fields bfields@redhat.com lockd: fix failure to cleanup client locks
J. Bruce Fields bfields@redhat.com lockd: fix server crash on reboot of client holding lock
Miklos Szeredi mszeredi@redhat.com ovl: don't fail copy up if no fileattr support on upper
John Hubbard jhubbard@nvidia.com Revert "mm/gup: small refactoring: simplify try_grab_page()"
Eric W. Biederman ebiederm@xmission.com cgroup-v1: Require capabilities to set release_agent
Maxime Ripard maxime@cerno.tech drm/vc4: hdmi: Make sure the device is powered with CEC
Alex Elder elder@linaro.org net: ipa: prevent concurrent replenish
Alex Elder elder@linaro.org net: ipa: use a bitmap for endpoint replenish_enabled
Paolo Abeni pabeni@redhat.com selftests: mptcp: fix ipv6 routing setup
Lukas Wunner lukas@wunner.de PCI: pciehp: Fix infinite loop in IRQ handler upon power fault
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c | 25 ++++++++-------- drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-drv.c | 14 ++++++++- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 6 ++-- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++-- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/qos.c | 3 +- .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/rep/bond.c | 32 +++++++++----------- .../ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/rep/bridge.c | 6 ++-- .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.c | 13 ++++++-- .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/bridge.c | 4 +++ .../mlx5/core/esw/diag/bridge_tracepoint.h | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fw_reset.c | 2 +- .../ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/fs_chains.c | 9 +++--- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/port.c | 9 +++--- drivers/net/ipa/ipa_endpoint.c | 21 ++++++++++--- drivers/net/ipa/ipa_endpoint.h | 17 +++++++++-- drivers/net/usb/ipheth.c | 6 ++-- drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 7 +++-- fs/lockd/svcsubs.c | 18 ++++++----- fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 6 ++-- fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c | 12 +++++++- kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c | 14 +++++++++ kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 3 +- mm/gup.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++---- net/core/rtnetlink.c | 6 ++-- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 2 ++ net/packet/af_packet.c | 8 +++-- net/sched/cls_api.c | 11 ++++--- tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 5 ++-- 30 files changed, 239 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
On 04/02/22 16.22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.20 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig from raspberry pi kernel sources) and ppc64 (ps3_defconfig).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya bagasdotme@gmail.com
On Fri, 04 Feb 2022 10:22:10 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.20 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.20-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.15: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 114 tests: 114 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.15.20-rc1-g61f904d1d627 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On 2/4/2022 1:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.20 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.20-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On 2/4/22 2:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.20 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.20-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:22:10AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.20 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 488 pass: 488 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On 2/4/22 01:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.20 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.20-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos re@w6rz.net
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:22:10AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.20 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.20-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes jforbes@fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:22:10 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.20 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.20-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
5.15.20-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen foxhlchen@gmail.com
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022, at 4:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.20 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg, Great news, I was able to compile and boot 5.15.20-rc1 on my x86_64 test system without any errors or regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins slade@sladewatkins.com
Thanks, Slade
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 14:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.20 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.20-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.15.20-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.15.y * git commit: 61f904d1d62716d179a70419e910118621910751 * git describe: v5.15.19-34-g61f904d1d627 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.19) No test regressions found.
## Metric regressions (compared to v5.15.19) No metric regressions found.
## Test fixes (compared to v5.15.19) No test fixes found.
## Metric fixes (compared to v5.15.19) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 104639, pass: 89348, fail: 1149, skip: 13256, xfail: 886
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 263 total, 261 passed, 2 failed * arm64: 42 total, 39 passed, 3 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 40 total, 37 passed, 3 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 37 total, 35 passed, 2 failed * parisc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 56 total, 50 passed, 6 failed * riscv: 28 total, 22 passed, 6 failed * s390: 22 total, 20 passed, 2 failed * sh: 26 total, 24 passed, 2 failed * sparc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 42 total, 39 passed, 3 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:22:10AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.20 release. There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 62 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 100 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/708 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/710 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/712
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
-
Bagas Sanjaya -
Florian Fainelli -
Fox Chen -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Justin Forbes -
Naresh Kamboju -
Ron Economos -
Shuah Khan -
Slade Watkins -
Sudip Mukherjee