This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.18.9-rc1
Pavel Begunkov asml.silence@gmail.com io_uring: fix not locked access to fixed buf table
Naveen N. Rao naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com powerpc/ftrace: Remove ftrace init tramp once kernel init is complete
Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org hinic: Replace memcpy() with direct assignment
Coly Li colyli@suse.de bcache: memset on stack variables in bch_btree_check() and bch_sectors_dirty_init()
Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org clocksource/drivers/ixp4xx: Drop boardfile probe path
Masahiro Yamada masahiroy@kernel.org tick/nohz: unexport __init-annotated tick_nohz_full_setup()
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +-- arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h | 4 ++- arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 15 ++++++++-- arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 2 ++ drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 2 +- drivers/clocksource/timer-ixp4xx.c | 25 ----------------- drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 1 + drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.c | 4 +-- fs/io_uring.c | 34 ++++++++++++----------- include/linux/platform_data/timer-ixp4xx.h | 11 -------- kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 1 - 12 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 15:47:26 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.18: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 130 tests: 130 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.18.9-rc1-g2c9a64b3a872 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 9:17 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hi Greg,
Compiled and booted on my test system Lenovo P50s: Intel Core i7 No emergency and critical messages in the dmesg
./perf bench sched all # Running sched/messaging benchmark... # 20 sender and receiver processes per group # 10 groups == 400 processes run
Total time: 0.427 [sec]
# Running sched/pipe benchmark... # Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes
Total time: 10.046 [sec]
10.046035 usecs/op 99541 ops/sec
Tested-by: Zan Aziz zanaziz313@gmail.com
Thanks -Zan
On 6/30/22 7:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On 6/30/2022 6:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 489 pass: 489 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On 6/30/22 6:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos re@w6rz.net
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 at 19:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.18.9-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.18.y * git commit: 2c9a64b3a872fb2818d217509b16e61ba54c365e * git describe: v5.18.8-7-g2c9a64b3a872 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.18.y/build/v5.18....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.18.8) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.18.8) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.18.8) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.18.8) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 120950, pass: 109794, fail: 546, skip: 9999, xfail: 611
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 307 total, 307 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 62 total, 62 passed, 0 failed * i386: 52 total, 49 passed, 3 failed * mips: 48 total, 48 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 60 total, 54 passed, 6 failed * riscv: 27 total, 22 passed, 5 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 56 total, 54 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance * vdso
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0) and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
I get a warning on cifs:
CC [M] fs/cifs/connect.o CC drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.o CC drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.o fs/cifs/connect.c: In function 'is_path_remote': fs/cifs/connect.c:3426:14: warning: unused variable 'nodfs' [-Wunused-variable] 3426 | bool nodfs = cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_DFS; | ^~~~~
The culprit is commit 2340f1adf9fbb3 ("cifs: don't call cifs_dfs_query_info_nonascii_quirk() if nodfs was set") (upstream commit 421ef3d56513b2).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya bagasdotme@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 02:59:10PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0) and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
I get a warning on cifs:
CC [M] fs/cifs/connect.o CC drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.o CC drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.o fs/cifs/connect.c: In function 'is_path_remote': fs/cifs/connect.c:3426:14: warning: unused variable 'nodfs' [-Wunused-variable] 3426 | bool nodfs = cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_DFS; | ^~~~~
The culprit is commit 2340f1adf9fbb3 ("cifs: don't call cifs_dfs_query_info_nonascii_quirk() if nodfs was set") (upstream commit 421ef3d56513b2).
Again, gcc-12 is going to have problems with stable releases until Linus's tree is fixed up entirely. Once that happens, then I will take backports to stable kernels to get them to build properly.
But until then, no need to report anything here, as there's nothing I can do.
thanks,
greg k-h
On 7/1/22 15:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Again, gcc-12 is going to have problems with stable releases until Linus's tree is fixed up entirely. Once that happens, then I will take backports to stable kernels to get them to build properly.
OK.
I also tried building the mainline (with ppc64_defconfig), no warnings reported.
Thanks.
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 10:24:10AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 02:59:10PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0) and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
I get a warning on cifs:
CC [M] fs/cifs/connect.o CC drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.o CC drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.o fs/cifs/connect.c: In function 'is_path_remote': fs/cifs/connect.c:3426:14: warning: unused variable 'nodfs' [-Wunused-variable] 3426 | bool nodfs = cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_DFS; | ^~~~~
The culprit is commit 2340f1adf9fbb3 ("cifs: don't call cifs_dfs_query_info_nonascii_quirk() if nodfs was set") (upstream commit 421ef3d56513b2).
Again, gcc-12 is going to have problems with stable releases until Linus's tree is fixed up entirely. Once that happens, then I will take backports to stable kernels to get them to build properly.
I have not tested, but this should be fixed by this one:
93ed91c020aa ("cifs: fix minor compile warning")
-- Regards Sudip
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 11:31:27AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 10:24:10AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 02:59:10PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0) and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
I get a warning on cifs:
CC [M] fs/cifs/connect.o CC drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.o CC drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.o fs/cifs/connect.c: In function 'is_path_remote': fs/cifs/connect.c:3426:14: warning: unused variable 'nodfs' [-Wunused-variable] 3426 | bool nodfs = cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_DFS; | ^~~~~
The culprit is commit 2340f1adf9fbb3 ("cifs: don't call cifs_dfs_query_info_nonascii_quirk() if nodfs was set") (upstream commit 421ef3d56513b2).
Again, gcc-12 is going to have problems with stable releases until Linus's tree is fixed up entirely. Once that happens, then I will take backports to stable kernels to get them to build properly.
I have not tested, but this should be fixed by this one:
93ed91c020aa ("cifs: fix minor compile warning")
Thanks, now queued up.
greg k-h
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 12.1.1 20220627): mips: 59 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1431 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1438 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1440
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg,
5.18.8-rc1 tested.
Run tested on: - Intel Tiger Lake x86_64 (nuc11 i7-1165G7)
In addition - build tested for: - Allwinner A64 - Allwinner H3 - Allwinner H5 - Allwinner H6 - NXP iMX6 - NXP iMX8 - Qualcomm Dragonboard - Rockchip RK3288 - Rockchip RK3328 - Rockchip RK3399pro - Samsung Exynos
Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum rudi@heitbaum.com -- Rudi
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg,
resend:
5.18.9-rc1 tested.
Run tested on: - Intel Tiger Lake x86_64 (nuc11 i7-1165G7)
In addition - build tested for: - Allwinner A64 - Allwinner H3 - Allwinner H5 - Allwinner H6 - NXP iMX6 - NXP iMX8 - Qualcomm Dragonboard - Rockchip RK3288 - Rockchip RK3328 - Rockchip RK3399pro - Samsung Exynos
Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum rudi@heitbaum.com -- Rudi
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes jforbes@fedoraproject.org
-
Bagas Sanjaya -
Florian Fainelli -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Justin Forbes -
Naresh Kamboju -
Ron Economos -
Rudi Heitbaum -
Shuah Khan -
Sudip Mukherjee -
Zan Aziz