This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.9 release. There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:24:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.8.9-rc1.g... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.8.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.8.9-rc1
Florian Westphal fw@strlen.de mptcp: free acked data before waiting for more memory
Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org net: disable netpoll on fresh napis
Tuong Lien tuong.t.lien@dektech.com.au tipc: fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
Tetsuo Handa penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp tipc: fix shutdown() of connectionless socket
Vinicius Costa Gomes vinicius.gomes@intel.com taprio: Fix using wrong queues in gate mask
Xin Long lucien.xin@gmail.com sctp: not disable bh in the whole sctp_get_port_local()
Kamil Lorenc kamil@re-ws.pl net: usb: dm9601: Add USB ID of Keenetic Plus DSL
Paul Moore paul@paul-moore.com netlabel: fix problems with mapping removal
Ido Schimmel idosch@nvidia.com ipv6: Fix sysctl max for fib_multipath_hash_policy
Ido Schimmel idosch@nvidia.com ipv4: Silence suspicious RCU usage warning
Jason Gunthorpe jgg@nvidia.com RDMA/cma: Execute rdma_cm destruction from a handler properly
Jason Gunthorpe jgg@nvidia.com RDMA/cma: Remove unneeded locking for req paths
Jason Gunthorpe jgg@nvidia.com RDMA/cma: Using the standard locking pattern when delivering the removal event
Jason Gunthorpe jgg@nvidia.com RDMA/cma: Simplify DEVICE_REMOVAL for internal_id
Pavel Begunkov asml.silence@gmail.com io_uring: fix linked deferred ->files cancellation
Pavel Begunkov asml.silence@gmail.com io_uring: fix cancel of deferred reqs with ->files
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c | 257 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- drivers/net/usb/dm9601.c | 4 + fs/io_uring.c | 47 +++++++ net/core/dev.c | 3 +- net/core/netpoll.c | 2 +- net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 3 +- net/ipv6/sysctl_net_ipv6.c | 3 +- net/mptcp/protocol.c | 3 +- net/netlabel/netlabel_domainhash.c | 59 ++++----- net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 30 ++++- net/sctp/socket.c | 16 +-- net/tipc/crypto.c | 12 +- net/tipc/socket.c | 9 +- 14 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 193 deletions(-)
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:47:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.9 release. There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:24:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.8.9-rc1.g... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.8.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.8: 14 builds: 14 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 60 tests: 60 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.8.9-rc1-gdcdaabfe3cea Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 05:10:32PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:47:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.9 release. There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:24:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.8.9-rc1.g... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.8.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.8: 14 builds: 14 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 60 tests: 60 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.8.9-rc1-gdcdaabfe3cea Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Thanks for testing and letting me know.
greg k-h
On 9/11/20 6:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.9 release. There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:24:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.8.9-rc1.g... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.8.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 04:19:48PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 9/11/20 6:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.9 release. There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:24:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.8.9-rc1.g... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.8.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.
greg k-h
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 02:47:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.9 release. There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:24:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 430 pass: 430 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 07:19:12PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 02:47:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.9 release. There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:24:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 430 pass: 430 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Thanks for testing all of tehse and letting me know.
greg k-h
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 18:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.9 release. There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:24:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.8.9-rc1.g... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.8.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 5.8.9-rc1 git repo: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc'] git branch: linux-5.8.y git commit: dcdaabfe3cea0fafa25a9a2ce8d83fd4edad41d6 git describe: v5.8.8-17-gdcdaabfe3cea Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.8.y/build/v5.8.8-...
No regressions (compared to build v5.8.8)
No fixes (compared to build v5.8.8)
Ran 20836 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
Environments -------------- - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - x15 - x86
Test Suites ----------- * build * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest * kselftest/drivers * kselftest/filesystems * kselftest/net * linux-log-parser * perf * network-basic-tests * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * v4l2-compliance * ltp-open-posix-tests * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native/drivers * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native/filesystems * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native/net * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none/drivers * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none/filesystems * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none/net * ssuite
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 12:57:38PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 18:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.9 release. There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:24:42 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.8.9-rc1.g... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.8.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
Wonderful, thanks for testing them all and letting me know.
greg k-h
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Shuah Khan