This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.97 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.97-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.97-rc1
Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com tcp: add missing tcp_skb_can_collapse() test in tcp_shift_skb_data()
Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com af_packet: fix data-race in packet_setsockopt / packet_setsockopt
Tianchen Ding dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com cpuset: Fix the bug that subpart_cpus updated wrongly in update_cpumask()
Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com rtnetlink: make sure to refresh master_dev/m_ops in __rtnl_newlink()
Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com net: sched: fix use-after-free in tc_new_tfilter()
Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com fanotify: Fix stale file descriptor in copy_event_to_user()
Shyam Sundar S K Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com net: amd-xgbe: Fix skb data length underflow
Raju Rangoju Raju.Rangoju@amd.com net: amd-xgbe: ensure to reset the tx_timer_active flag
Georgi Valkov gvalkov@abv.bg ipheth: fix EOVERFLOW in ipheth_rcvbulk_callback
Maor Dickman maord@nvidia.com net/mlx5: E-Switch, Fix uninitialized variable modact
Maher Sanalla msanalla@nvidia.com net/mlx5: Use del_timer_sync in fw reset flow of halting poll
Maor Dickman maord@nvidia.com net/mlx5e: Fix handling of wrong devices during bond netevent
Eric W. Biederman ebiederm@xmission.com cgroup-v1: Require capabilities to set release_agent
Maxime Ripard maxime@cerno.tech drm/vc4: hdmi: Make sure the device is powered with CEC
Tony Luck tony.luck@intel.com x86/cpu: Add Xeon Icelake-D to list of CPUs that support PPIN
Tony Luck tony.luck@intel.com x86/mce: Add Xeon Sapphire Rapids to list of CPUs that support PPIN
Namhyung Kim namhyung@kernel.org perf/core: Fix cgroup event list management
Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org perf: Rework perf_event_exit_event()
Suren Baghdasaryan surenb@google.com psi: Fix uaf issue when psi trigger is destroyed while being polled
Sean Christopherson seanjc@google.com KVM: x86: Forcibly leave nested virt when SMM state is toggled
Kevin Hilman khilman@baylibre.com Revert "drivers: bus: simple-pm-bus: Add support for probing simple bus only devices"
Alex Elder elder@linaro.org net: ipa: prevent concurrent replenish
Alex Elder elder@linaro.org net: ipa: use a bitmap for endpoint replenish_enabled
Alex Elder elder@linaro.org net: ipa: fix atomic update in ipa_endpoint_replenish()
Lukas Wunner lukas@wunner.de PCI: pciehp: Fix infinite loop in IRQ handler upon power fault
-------------
Diffstat:
Documentation/accounting/psi.rst | 3 +- Makefile | 4 +- arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/intel.c | 2 + arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 10 +- arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 1 + arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 + drivers/bus/simple-pm-bus.c | 39 +----- drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c | 25 ++-- drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-drv.c | 14 +- .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/rep/bond.c | 32 ++--- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fw_reset.c | 2 +- .../ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/fs_chains.c | 2 +- drivers/net/ipa/ipa_endpoint.c | 25 ++-- drivers/net/ipa/ipa_endpoint.h | 15 +- drivers/net/usb/ipheth.c | 6 +- drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 7 +- fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 6 +- include/linux/perf_event.h | 1 + include/linux/psi.h | 2 +- include/linux/psi_types.h | 3 - kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c | 14 ++ kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 11 +- kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 3 +- kernel/events/core.c | 151 ++++++++++++--------- kernel/sched/psi.c | 66 ++++----- net/core/rtnetlink.c | 6 +- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 2 + net/packet/af_packet.c | 8 +- net/sched/cls_api.c | 11 +- 32 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 214 deletions(-)
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.97 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any new kernel problems here (but we still hit the gmp.h compilation issue):
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On Fri, 04 Feb 2022 10:20:07 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.97 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.97-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.97-rc1-g847fbfddce32 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On 2/4/2022 1:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.97 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.97-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:20:07 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.97 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.97-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
5.10.97-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen foxhlchen@gmail.com
On 2/4/22 2:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.97 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.97-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:20:07AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.97 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 161 pass: 161 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022, at 4:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.97 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
I was able to compile and boot on my x86_64 test system without any errors or regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins slade@sladewatkins.com
Thanks, Slade
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 14:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.97 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.97-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.97-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: 847fbfddce327344933153bb39a4379b080bede7 * git describe: v5.10.96-26-g847fbfddce32 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.96) No test regressions found.
## Metric regressions (compared to v5.10.96) No metric regressions found.
## Test fixes (compared to v5.10.96) No test fixes found.
## Metric fixes (compared to v5.10.96) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 98319, pass: 84375, fail: 545, skip: 12496, xfail: 903
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 52 total, 46 passed, 6 failed * riscv: 24 total, 22 passed, 2 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:20:07AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.97 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/707 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/711
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip