This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.177 release. There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.177-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.4.177-rc1
Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com af_packet: fix data-race in packet_setsockopt / packet_setsockopt
Tianchen Ding dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com cpuset: Fix the bug that subpart_cpus updated wrongly in update_cpumask()
Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com rtnetlink: make sure to refresh master_dev/m_ops in __rtnl_newlink()
Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com net: sched: fix use-after-free in tc_new_tfilter()
Shyam Sundar S K Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com net: amd-xgbe: Fix skb data length underflow
Raju Rangoju Raju.Rangoju@amd.com net: amd-xgbe: ensure to reset the tx_timer_active flag
Georgi Valkov gvalkov@abv.bg ipheth: fix EOVERFLOW in ipheth_rcvbulk_callback
Eric W. Biederman ebiederm@xmission.com cgroup-v1: Require capabilities to set release_agent
Suren Baghdasaryan surenb@google.com psi: Fix uaf issue when psi trigger is destroyed while being polled
Lukas Wunner lukas@wunner.de PCI: pciehp: Fix infinite loop in IRQ handler upon power fault
-------------
Diffstat:
Documentation/accounting/psi.rst | 3 +- Makefile | 4 +- drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-drv.c | 14 ++++++- drivers/net/usb/ipheth.c | 6 +-- drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 7 ++-- include/linux/psi.h | 2 +- include/linux/psi_types.h | 3 -- kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c | 14 +++++++ kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 11 ++++-- kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 3 +- kernel/sched/psi.c | 66 ++++++++++++++------------------ net/core/rtnetlink.c | 6 ++- net/packet/af_packet.c | 8 +++- net/sched/cls_api.c | 11 ++++-- 14 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
On Fri, 04 Feb 2022 10:20:13 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.177 release. There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.177-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.4: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 59 tests: 59 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.4.177-rc1-gdb9bfa6e8ef5 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022, at 4:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.177 release. There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
I was able to compile and boot on my x86_64 test system with no errors or regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins slade@sladewatkins.com
Best, Slade
On 2/4/2022 1:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.177 release. There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.177-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On 2/4/22 2:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.177 release. There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.177-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:20:13AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.177 release. There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 449 pass: 449 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 14:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.177 release. There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.177-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.4.177-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.4.y * git commit: db9bfa6e8ef56c7c343bcb51031ea93db5f8d157 * git describe: v5.4.176-11-gdb9bfa6e8ef5 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.17...
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.176) No test regressions found.
## Metric regressions (compared to v5.4.176) No metric regressions found.
## Test fixes (compared to v5.4.176) No test fixes found.
## Metric fixes (compared to v5.4.176) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 93678, pass: 78131, fail: 764, skip: 13342, xfail: 1441
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 258 total, 258 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 24 total, 23 passed, 1 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 52 total, 48 passed, 4 failed * riscv: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:20:13AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.177 release. There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/709
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
-
Florian Fainelli -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Shuah Khan -
Slade Watkins -
Sudip Mukherjee