This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.3 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.3-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.19.3-rc1
Coiby Xu coxu@redhat.com arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature
Coiby Xu coxu@redhat.com kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic
Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com btrfs: raid56: don't trust any cached sector in __raid56_parity_recover()
Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com btrfs: only write the sectors in the vertical stripe which has data stripes
Jamal Hadi Salim jhs@mojatatu.com net_sched: cls_route: disallow handle of 0
Jens Wiklander jens.wiklander@linaro.org tee: add overflow check in register_shm_helper()
Marco Elver elver@google.com Revert "mm: kfence: apply kmemleak_ignore_phys on early allocated pool"
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +-- arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c | 11 +------ arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c | 20 +----------- drivers/tee/tee_shm.c | 3 ++ fs/btrfs/raid56.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- include/linux/kexec.h | 7 ++++ kernel/kexec_file.c | 17 ++++++++++ mm/kfence/core.c | 18 +++++------ net/sched/cls_route.c | 10 ++++++ 9 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 10:54 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.3 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.3-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hi Greg,
Compiled and booted on my test system Lenovo P50s: Intel Core i7 No emergency and critical messages in the dmesg
./perf bench sched all # Running sched/messaging benchmark... # 20 sender and receiver processes per group # 10 groups == 400 processes run
Total time: 0.734 [sec]
# Running sched/pipe benchmark... # Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes
Total time: 10.845 [sec]
10.845776 usecs/op 92201 ops/sec
Tested-by: Zan Aziz zanaziz313@gmail.com
Thanks -Zan
On 8/19/22 9:39 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.3 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.3-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On 8/19/22 8:39 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.3 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.3-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos re@w6rz.net
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 21:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.3 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.3-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro's test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.19.3-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.19.y * git commit: 8c2c6014fe886925b313a6e8b6eb46763dafbaff * git describe: v5.19.2-8-g8c2c6014fe88 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.19.y/build/v5.19....
## No test Regressions (compared to v5.19.2)
## No metric Regressions (compared to v5.19.2)
## No test Fixes (compared to v5.19.2)
## No metric Fixes (compared to v5.19.2)
## Test result summary total: 167248, pass: 149293, fail: 1211, skip: 15719, xfail: 1025
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 314 total, 311 passed, 3 failed * arm64: 76 total, 74 passed, 2 failed * i386: 64 total, 58 passed, 6 failed * mips: 50 total, 47 passed, 3 failed * parisc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 65 total, 56 passed, 9 failed * riscv: 32 total, 27 passed, 5 failed * s390: 22 total, 20 passed, 2 failed * sh: 26 total, 24 passed, 2 failed * sparc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 69 total, 67 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance * vdso
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 05:39:16PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.3 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20220819): mips: 59 configs -> 1 failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> fails powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Note: csky and mips allmodconfig fails with gcc-12, passes with gcc-11. Already reported for mainline.
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1663 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1668
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 05:39:16PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.3 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 10.2.0) and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya bagasdotme@gmail.com
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 05:39:16PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.3 release. There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 150 pass: 150 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 489 pass: 489 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
-
Bagas Sanjaya -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Naresh Kamboju -
Ron Economos -
Shuah Khan -
Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) -
Zan Aziz