This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.59 release. There are 19 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:05:12 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.59-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.59-rc1
YueHaibing yuehaibing@huawei.com net: xilinx_emaclite: Do not print real IOMEM pointer
Miklos Szeredi mszeredi@redhat.com ovl: prevent private clone if bind mount is not allowed
Pali Rohár pali@kernel.org ppp: Fix generating ppp unit id when ifname is not specified
Luke D Jones luke@ljones.dev ALSA: hda: Add quirk for ASUS Flow x13
Jeremy Szu jeremy.szu@canonical.com ALSA: hda/realtek: fix mute/micmute LEDs for HP ProBook 650 G8 Notebook PC
Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de ALSA: pcm: Fix mmap breakage without explicit buffer setup
Longfang Liu liulongfang@huawei.com USB:ehci:fix Kunpeng920 ehci hardware problem
Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com vboxsf: Make vboxsf_dir_create() return the handle for the created file
Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com vboxsf: Honor excl flag to the dir-inode create op
Adam Ford aford173@gmail.com arm64: dts: renesas: beacon: Fix USB ref clock references
Adam Ford aford173@gmail.com arm64: dts: renesas: beacon: Fix USB extal reference
Adam Ford aford173@gmail.com arm64: dts: renesas: rzg2: Add usb2_clksel to RZ/G2 M/N/H
Mike Rapoport rppt@kernel.org mm: make zone_to_nid() and zone_set_nid() available for DISCONTIGMEM
Reinette Chatre reinette.chatre@intel.com Revert "selftests/resctrl: Use resctrl/info for feature detection"
Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net bpf: Add lockdown check for probe_write_user helper
Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net bpf: Add _kernel suffix to internal lockdown_bpf_read
Allen Pais apais@linux.microsoft.com firmware: tee_bnxt: Release TEE shm, session, and context during kexec
Sumit Garg sumit.garg@linaro.org tee: Correct inappropriate usage of TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF flag
Sean Christopherson seanjc@google.com KVM: SVM: Fix off-by-one indexing when nullifying last used SEV VMCB
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- .../boot/dts/renesas/beacon-renesom-baseboard.dtsi | 4 +- .../arm64/boot/dts/renesas/beacon-renesom-som.dtsi | 6 ++- arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774a1.dtsi | 15 +++++++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774b1.dtsi | 15 +++++++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774e1.dtsi | 15 +++++++ arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 2 +- drivers/firmware/broadcom/tee_bnxt_fw.c | 14 ++++-- drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_emaclite.c | 5 +-- drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c | 19 ++++++-- drivers/tee/optee/call.c | 2 +- drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 3 +- drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 5 ++- drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c | 8 +++- drivers/tee/tee_shm.c | 4 +- drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c | 3 ++ fs/namespace.c | 42 +++++++++++------ fs/vboxsf/dir.c | 28 +++++++----- include/linux/mmzone.h | 4 +- include/linux/security.h | 3 +- include/linux/tee_drv.h | 1 + kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 4 +- kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 13 +++--- security/security.c | 3 +- sound/core/pcm_native.c | 5 ++- sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h | 6 +-- tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 52 +++++----------------- 28 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
On 8/13/21 9:07 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.59 release. There are 19 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:05:12 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.59-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 05:07:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.59 release. There are 19 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:05:12 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210723): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210723): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.1.1 20210723): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/29 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/30
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 at 20:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.59 release. There are 19 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:05:12 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.59-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.59-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: ed2493daa915286093123bc53c2172d717bc5d82 * git describe: v5.10.57-155-ged2493daa915 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## No regressions (compared to v5.10.57-155-g81212a8abbf6)
## No fixes (compared to v5.10.57-155-g81212a8abbf6)
## Test result summary total: 82479, pass: 69458, fail: 306, skip: 11842, xfail: 873
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 194 total, 194 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 28 total, 28 passed, 0 failed * i386: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 28 total, 28 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:07:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.59 release. There are 19 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:05:12 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.59-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
5.10.59-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen foxhlchen@gmail.com
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 05:07:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.59 release. There are 19 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:05:12 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 472 pass: 472 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.59 release. There are 19 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:05:12 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
CIP testing did not find any kernel problems here: (but we have some infrastructure problems)
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On 2021/8/13 23:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.59 release. There are 19 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:05:12 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.59-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.59-rc1,
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.59-rc1 Commit: ed2493daa915286093123bc53c2172d717bc5d82 Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 8907 passed: 8907 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
x86: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 8907 passed: 8907 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot hulkrobot@huawei.com
-
Fox Chen -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Naresh Kamboju -
Pavel Machek -
Samuel Zou -
Shuah Khan -
Sudip Mukherjee