On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 01:33:38PM +0100, Milosz Wasilewski wrote:
On 20 June 2017 at 12:42, Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org wrote:
format: Lava-Test Test Definition 1.0
Do we need this in the e-mail? It doesn't seem relevant.
This is already fixed and will be rolled out this week
Thanks for looking at these! It seems like there's a lot of things here that are already fixed and waiting to be rolled out. Especially while we are in the fairly early stages of the project is it worth looking at our process here so we can get a tighter feedback loop? That'd help with iterating on feedback hopefully.
I think the best approach is to keep the feedback coming on the ML to give everybody the chance to pitch in. We tweaked our release process so you will see feedback get incorporated much faster than before and that will tighten the feedback loop significantly.
anmar