This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards f2bdc9e66a5 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 897410174ba onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 55b00308bcd onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards db940e76f66 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards cd6dc5a4c4e onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 0650c1b4465 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 7ed6ce95eb1 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards b98cae5eef0 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards f97e28a301c 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 54d53e4fd6b 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 2b304672dc3 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards aa7e43c10b7 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards e5eec57239b 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 59b57b2f29e 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards bca7dd4a6d2 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards ead3a0c13f0 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards e12e6af9c6b 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 7333fb72169 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 9bf871ea4bf 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards d90145de5e5 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 123025d5f80 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 8a1908d6eb2 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 7e4f0038e42 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards c292975ee20 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gc [...] discards efb74e11fe0 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-4846 [...] discards 17b67340c70 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 711ac36140f 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 23 [...] discards 5b00fcbd163 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards bf6a9f2e2c9 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 09bd90f58ba 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards bdcf53e6e15 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 8d283e9b830 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards c845b542ac9 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] discards 3aad2c9d73b 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 6ba1c10cdba 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 4074ab6b9c7 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] discards 2b9b2ed40ea 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 84e5f35f594 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 6e1883b803f 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards a4cea874b71 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7ca84443b33 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 0b1ed4a9e0f 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 2d1d7a171ae 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% [...] discards 3e6065a2fee 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 589a8629670 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-455 [...] discards 192cf471433 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 181585581aa 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7181f86c8ba 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7a89c3f97c3 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards b7128609b20 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 [...] discards 81d13cb0063 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards acc2c6543ba 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards ae67f61b479 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_ste [...] discards 672608ab66f 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] discards 43db99c40a4 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards e79b5fdb480 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8e61a18f395 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards e21fbc55073 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 305c7c6ee8b 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards d89a1c69fbc 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 3c914100828 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slo [...] discards 110067aee94 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards 77f31792403 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 013634f92a8 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchp [...] discards fd04ef5ec27 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 829a9bebf48 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards f48fd492df1 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards e25ac0420b3 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 645 [...] discards 3e0aaa5da3a 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK [...] discards 279b4d88d9b 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards a7994d6a7c8 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards b4e310785ca 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] discards 5931b640d33 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards 4cb1fa01f17 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 29dbc05055e 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d714c69008f 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards d3291152824 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 03722c6b73c 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards f7948e031b1 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards b2002d403f4 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards e4843d921b5 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] discards 2ac53f231de 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 47d75c7e1c6 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6173f699c21 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and r [...] discards cc96faad56b 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards ac90ca170c5 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 898e043b71e 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 [...] discards dc0abf81c01 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards cad889bcbe7 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards a0c09b6e112 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and ru [...] discards f93fd97fb88 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build [...] discards 2ca8816acfe 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 9d43549b2e3 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% a [...] discards 0b820fe75c4 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 2 [...] discards 21e4f8ccf8d 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 7c7e6475409 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 3 [...] discards 70589c71690 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 0922e2cd04f 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 13b806d7ec2 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 07beecd5f41 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 75d1c171acf 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new b596820aa86 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 9eb46d18189 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 51629d75340 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 5bfa749ab88 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 3 [...] new da9580bb030 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new a9ea7d9c222 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 2 [...] new 07bd61f4403 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% a [...] new 246abc638a9 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 441c2d4551c 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build [...] new f2984ee3f3c 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and ru [...] new 43edace98ce 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 3d4a100cbe9 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 01c6bb2f317 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 [...] new 3e1a3193119 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 6e4ec62b2bf 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 8104b31f4ca 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and r [...] new b502186b6a1 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1fa01ec4b17 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new dd63b2cd2f1 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] new 8b5620d5b9b 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new aced142b513 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new c595b776b84 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new 017de8e41b9 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 1ec20401789 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 887ce674a2e 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new e1e70d3ad65 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0b660b1ac76 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new 2881ae87d62 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] new 76ee8dd7cb6 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 1e03a045c94 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 8520b3bae63 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK [...] new 77c8ca15c53 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 645 [...] new 4944b8a7e49 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new e2b2e2c0a79 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new d84d428e5d5 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new b8739acdc0a 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchp [...] new 78a8a30c6dd 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 1449ca6dd53 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new ed5c7f836f5 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slo [...] new ddf6cd4da9d 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new b4deb897564 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new b03192b736e 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 1edfc4c117f 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 9c1ccbcafc4 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 335613c0e7b 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new cec628df0aa 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] new d6faadfff7b 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_ste [...] new fbe119e26fa 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 4f046850785 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 666d822eac0 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 [...] new 5c1617cb994 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 1bd5308b3ef 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0b2a1837327 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 90e08506cd5 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 4fcae5d88b3 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-455 [...] new 4a29db55d75 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new 044e01ded8a 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% [...] new be84626365d 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new a0a7e92353d 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 557de05652d 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 192bd71561d 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new 6489157f492 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 919573aac02 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new ca3ffb0ab37 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] new 54b28afcac4 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 19d4749a78b 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new dacdb8644c9 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] new 3ca5732868b 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new b5f92240a13 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new c27cf40afc7 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 1de13382a16 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new cb81faa76b7 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 16323f97ba2 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 23 [...] new 86bffa86be1 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new 21a2e28b336 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-4846 [...] new 6e97d359b4a 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gc [...] new dafaee13841 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 4d9f85bb636 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 1aa1c8c8316 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new a9c9e8a7652 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 02195119f9c 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new df38c051fd3 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 65617c80e3d 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new e3d26889325 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 995ca187d61 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 6ec261462cd 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 9dd308b65f7 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new d453daffe55 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new f23dd533504 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 7d12044fc5c 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new f04673bb0ed 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new ca743cafecb 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 8303eabcf12 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 48f4676e918 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new c4bcd21aa96 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 6b573f635c8 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 0512edc8685 onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 28fd2780a93 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new e682c899665 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new bdcfac2ed01 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (f2bdc9e66a5) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2304 -> 2456 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2608 -> 2664 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 28588 -> 28532 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17716 -> 17980 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 92048 -> 94240 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 71772 -> 71760 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8548 -> 7948 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233776 -> 235260 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185736 -> 185996 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 213144 -> 216720 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 180928 -> 181028 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 125 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 123 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 7832 -> 7468 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 181 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 3268 -> 3116 bytes 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 386 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 6 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 12 +- manifest.sh | 12 +- notify/jira/comments.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 54 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- notify/notify-full.log | 312 +- notify/notify-init.log | 90 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 204 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3327 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 786970 +++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 802115 ++++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28643 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 66 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 206 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3427 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 796000 ++++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 811045 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28494 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 66 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 3509 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 142 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4245 +- results_id | 2 +- 52 files changed, 1644311 insertions(+), 1626557 deletions(-)