This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards bdcfac2ed0 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards e682c89966 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 28fd2780a9 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 0512edc868 onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 6b573f635c onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c4bcd21aa9 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 48f4676e91 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 8303eabcf1 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards ca743cafec 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards f04673bb0e 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 7d12044fc5 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards f23dd53350 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards d453daffe5 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 9dd308b65f 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 6ec261462c 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 995ca187d6 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards e3d2688932 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 65617c80e3 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards df38c051fd 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 02195119f9 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards a9c9e8a765 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1aa1c8c831 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 4d9f85bb63 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards dafaee1384 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 6e97d359b4 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 21a2e28b33 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards 86bffa86be 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 16323f97ba 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards cb81faa76b 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 1de13382a1 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c27cf40afc 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards b5f92240a1 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 3ca5732868 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards dacdb8644c 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 19d4749a78 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 54b28afcac 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ca3ffb0ab3 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 919573aac0 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 6489157f49 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 192bd71561 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards 557de05652 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards a0a7e92353 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards be84626365 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 044e01ded8 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards 4a29db55d7 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 4fcae5d88b 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards 90e08506cd 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 0b2a183732 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1bd5308b3e 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5c1617cb99 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 666d822eac 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 4f04685078 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards fbe119e26f 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards d6faadfff7 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards cec628df0a 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 335613c0e7 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 9c1ccbcafc 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1edfc4c117 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards b03192b736 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards b4deb89756 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards ddf6cd4da9 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards ed5c7f836f 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards 1449ca6dd5 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 78a8a30c6d 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards b8739acdc0 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards d84d428e5d 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards e2b2e2c0a7 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 4944b8a7e4 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 77c8ca15c5 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards 8520b3bae6 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards 1e03a045c9 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 76ee8dd7cb 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 2881ae87d6 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 0b660b1ac7 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards e1e70d3ad6 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 887ce674a2 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1ec2040178 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 017de8e41b 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards c595b776b8 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards aced142b51 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 8b5620d5b9 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards dd63b2cd2f 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 1fa01ec4b1 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards b502186b6a 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 8104b31f4c 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards 6e4ec62b2b 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 3e1a319311 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 01c6bb2f31 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 3d4a100cbe 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 43edace98c 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards f2984ee3f3 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards 441c2d4551 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 246abc638a 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 07bd61f440 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards a9ea7d9c22 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards da9580bb03 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 5bfa749ab8 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards 51629d7534 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 9eb46d1818 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b596820aa8 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new bc8049aa1b 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 84b272e478 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 995e7275e3 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 4716704ca5 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new 52524c4b9c 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new a6f9f73372 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new 5126c2ca47 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 2f5607802a 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 091ea92f47 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 39a250d8bb 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new b60c04ea12 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 59af41d2d0 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 92b7c6fec0 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 3f198b159c 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 0523a6123b 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new c9c45ee91a 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 456821b8aa 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 894e59b8b8 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 133362ca5d 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 248fb63b4d 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 29e1f953d7 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new d6016e2606 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new ed2878e476 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 5c5c663d3c 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 04a9de7415 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1c7adecaf1 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 729034e813 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new 4a62cb20c5 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new b2b8d35b98 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new eae6399d18 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 929b5b9a0b 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new 4686d12b2e 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new 1251cab918 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 04a7049589 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 1968eef05a 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 9c75c2b0cf 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new 95aca5ae89 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 7e13915540 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 7e62d6411c 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new b6d0e78985 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new bc07f0b75f 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 1ef8651358 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 4af631adef 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 86883507e9 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 57cebb960b 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new ab6b690d17 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new a650483b28 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new 7953597311 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 2c5d5541b0 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new bc2eb7a1a7 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new 1464fe8776 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new b638d0dd3c 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ea8db5dbf8 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6ef77e9a2b 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new 4703b550fc 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new 4442dd1483 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new 3a226cb76d 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new f88f342272 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 555dc4dd7c 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new ae6ba1cfb7 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 86e71f0316 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new d47a5ed3bd 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 7b6e74df3d 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new d23f6442ea 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 6e983d89f1 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 105e8c160c 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b42d2e089a 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 6dedcca6c5 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new bc6ac73db0 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 55beb01489 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 61fad2c596 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ff53c9ca9d 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 7c50751c17 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new 0b3744f672 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new 8423ca1df6 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new f624009c5f 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 9c1e7ff2eb 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 11da1b5293 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 1e6aeb4ab2 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 94aa95ef28 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 707521be58 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new a3c665ae2e 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 87f83bc283 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 48ac473880 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 590b49b97b 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new cb155c76d2 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 18627da5c4 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new c301cc13a7 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 5ec000f1f6 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f8acbac31b 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 70cb963227 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new af925c4179 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new b681154d56 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 0e2cabe5e1 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new f9e41ae856 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new ea435f25e7 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new d09e1fb82b onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 631f591965 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 63b11c46a0 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 5cc0e0ebd9 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 0693aca8e8 onsuccess: #99: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (bdcfac2ed0) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2456 -> 2020 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2664 -> 2596 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 28532 -> 27564 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17980 -> 17812 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 94240 -> 92276 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 71760 -> 71648 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7948 -> 8664 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 235260 -> 233360 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185996 -> 185644 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 216720 -> 214056 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 181028 -> 181616 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 105 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 103 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 7468 -> 7808 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 182 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 3116 -> 3116 bytes 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 442 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 6 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 13 +- manifest.sh | 8 +- notify/jira/comments.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 48 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- notify/notify-full.log | 390 +- notify/notify-init.log | 142 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 204 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3427 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 797160 ++++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 811065 ++++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28300 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 70 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 170 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3241 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 820110 ++++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 834119 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28996 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 54 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 3485 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 64 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3870 +- results_id | 2 +- 50 files changed, 1691401 insertions(+), 1645477 deletions(-)