This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards 090dc9176c 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 72c37702db 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 519f31be45 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 815ae5e409 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 843a4753ce 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 7fcf569ae1 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 9bb77d66e6 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards dd12af326a 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards a254daf9e9 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 75609f25b1 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 4416e2d9e3 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards fe6c6190bc 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 82b1f743ed 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 1227d42adf 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards fa2c92a020 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards 0401beb52e 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 93710b4c2f 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 26d46877b6 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 2fb3eda8fe 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 53610602ac 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 988cb0d985 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 63d69e2dca 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f50ef51570 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards 1a4378badc 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] discards dc7af958f1 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards a5d6fa96a6 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards db65ff9bde 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 62a6899001 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] discards 04afca004e 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 5e56389c9f 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] discards 432b123521 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] discards b6deedf459 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 848d1d0cad 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] discards 983b0f34ef 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 7fe93a15e4 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 6cb7c59b0c 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 13f48c4b5c 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards 5d8507a68a 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 176eb903b9 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards a9168d197f 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3ee8e1380d 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 5946f3b1fb 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 44190fe63e 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 57f7193d9b 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6da4f035a9 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5129e8365a 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 0a390bf19e 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards 136c280c15 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 28bf798e36 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards 9628f6e00b 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 154528b128 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards d4ab8c4104 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards e0e040c465 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards a2314ccecf 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] discards 1bea4795d8 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 90288f9f2f 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards 09188106ab 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 3fc18c30ec 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 2cb1c5e5a0 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 448dc77111 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards d8387069a6 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 0586e6ccdf 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards a6e1a11f76 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards f4601c2c71 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e101eec80b 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards f0b902e1a4 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] discards dcd1843c81 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] discards 48647bbb10 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] discards 7385aff3ff 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 32b1583dca 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 2c8c171088 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 2ad8ec06dd 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] discards fe6e612d31 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards ff5e22e917 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 59f915c797 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0231a79a34 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1dc6e28ec6 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 70ac320093 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 7dac800ccc 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards 4dd585da08 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b7366a8096 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 941ca538e1 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 717b7a0fda 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 09746b8e12 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards a8b80ea64d 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards 4e4e6579e4 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 1287e5165f 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards 564390cafc 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 695598d31d 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards cf8e08ed87 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards 0003d78390 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards 2ce0e4ccb7 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 554b189da1 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 6733540cdc 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] discards 90ef3804c8 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards 9d47b297bf 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] discards 6c202ea4aa 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 57927e8bc7 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards ee19092e7b 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 875fd57fa8 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14% [...] discards c62520c9de 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed do [...] new 9f22d604e4 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed do [...] new da82c3fa9f 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14% [...] new a8b13d4857 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 70dc75d3a5 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 219dbd62c1 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1456a07dad 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] new f77b6090d8 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new d878d1cbae 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] new 7b9de0cea2 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 7a01eef852 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1f8e17570e 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new 580674d204 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new 961ca40fe5 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new c52d9b5a79 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0beae7a586 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new ddeec3157a 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 66091de8f8 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new f5725d2d26 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 98f2be9d91 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new a0b0417fc3 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 16147becf1 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3653c1e0bd 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3eeb65a56b 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new e3c959755d 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 8e7e9bf7bd 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 8e7360e854 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 56fbb9226c 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 40ceeaedd8 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new eb5f25aa72 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 23f22d613e 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] new 98207e5573 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 87bf440b7b 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new bfd8b1df6e 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 7823f342a6 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] new 51072f2e33 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] new 04aa42e435 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] new b8b57ccc4a 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 387683dcee 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d09f972fd0 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 3a9082dc82 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new ad4172e42a 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new b1f792ece3 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new ce8469d9f8 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new ff48651ff8 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 65e711bcd0 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new ffb761e579 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 597f84c45e 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 2da09a583f 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] new 16eb6f280d 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 832775a6e4 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 0c885081bd 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 4591cd3639 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 6a140ca42b 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new a8b1a605d3 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 34c1a3102b 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new 9ab511947c 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 4067e9ad47 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f6d6a05bee 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3999ec86ad 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6ae80d7d85 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new f9198b18a0 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new dbcf229ee4 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7f1e2485bd 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 4bcb3bfa30 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 7035d82c03 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 0ca9669d37 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new ac5b70c725 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new c6076718e5 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 2b9329b007 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] new f3818e3954 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new ba69e6a4bf 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] new 964088338e 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] new 3bff1ab72b 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 49b8bbe92c 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] new cd22e5a3e0 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 6d1e0e36bf 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new ddc80d5122 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new cd4bc4dfd2 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] new 3a0cf8b153 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new 44da2c2e12 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ef65c7527d 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 33a602bef7 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 41b7b9e05c 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 70b48ed3fe 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new 85d42411f7 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 86efb7b647 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new deab17a253 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new f9fa68c2cc 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 6a8af485cd 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 3cdd037bb9 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 8487cc1e8d 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 49d9d6c714 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 393bc818a8 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f6d43a9bdc 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new d34bb234d5 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 41bc5afd2b 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 6e8d457b9b 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 0057969d5e 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c13c1af444 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new edd1a1de70 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 0be63c1779 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 9b8ef082be 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (090dc9176c) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2172 -> 2220 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2492 -> 2464 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27368 -> 27924 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90660 -> 90976 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8560 -> 8508 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233180 -> 232932 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 211900 -> 212768 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 201 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 199 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4080 -> 4136 bytes 10-check_regression/429.mcf.symbols-regression | 1 + .../437.leslie3d.symbols-regression | 3 - 10-check_regression/464.h264ref.symbols-regression | 2 - 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 168 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 19468 -> 20812 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.regression | 3 +- 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 7 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 6 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 5 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 8 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 12 +- 10-check_regression/results.regressions | 9 +- 10-check_regression/symbol.regression | 6 +- 10-check_regression/trigger-bisect | 3 + 11-update_baseline/console.log | 68 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- mail/exe.regression | 3 +- mail/symbol.regression | 6 +- manifest.sh | 21 +- results | 9 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 237 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 28 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 28 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3038 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3342 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 76055 +-- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 639168 ++++++++---------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 18782 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 554 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 139 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3314 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 251 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 251 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3262 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 243 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 27 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2793 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3337 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 47970 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 556223 +++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 14014 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 282 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3040 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3342 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 76055 +-- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 639168 ++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 18782 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 554 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 139 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3468 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3776 +- results_id | 2 +- 69 files changed, 996567 insertions(+), 1126485 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/429.mcf.symbols-regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/437.leslie3d.symbols-regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/464.h264ref.symbols-regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/trigger-bisect