This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards 0693aca8e8 onsuccess: #99: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 5cc0e0ebd9 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 63b11c46a0 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 631f591965 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards d09e1fb82b onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards ea435f25e7 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards f9e41ae856 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 0e2cabe5e1 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards b681154d56 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards af925c4179 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 70cb963227 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards f8acbac31b 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 5ec000f1f6 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards c301cc13a7 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 18627da5c4 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards cb155c76d2 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 590b49b97b 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 48ac473880 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 87f83bc283 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards a3c665ae2e 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 707521be58 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 94aa95ef28 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1e6aeb4ab2 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 11da1b5293 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 9c1e7ff2eb 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards f624009c5f 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 8423ca1df6 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards 0b3744f672 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 7c50751c17 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards ff53c9ca9d 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 61fad2c596 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 55beb01489 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards bc6ac73db0 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 6dedcca6c5 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards b42d2e089a 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 105e8c160c 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6e983d89f1 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d23f6442ea 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 7b6e74df3d 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards d47a5ed3bd 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 86e71f0316 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards ae6ba1cfb7 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 555dc4dd7c 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards f88f342272 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 3a226cb76d 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards 4442dd1483 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 4703b550fc 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards 6ef77e9a2b 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards ea8db5dbf8 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b638d0dd3c 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1464fe8776 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards bc2eb7a1a7 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 2c5d5541b0 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 7953597311 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards a650483b28 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards ab6b690d17 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 57cebb960b 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 86883507e9 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4af631adef 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 1ef8651358 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards bc07f0b75f 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards b6d0e78985 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards 7e62d6411c 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards 7e13915540 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 95aca5ae89 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 9c75c2b0cf 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards 1968eef05a 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 04a7049589 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 1251cab918 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 4686d12b2e 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards 929b5b9a0b 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards eae6399d18 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards b2b8d35b98 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 4a62cb20c5 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 729034e813 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards 1c7adecaf1 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 04a9de7415 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5c5c663d3c 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards ed2878e476 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards d6016e2606 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 29e1f953d7 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 248fb63b4d 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 133362ca5d 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 894e59b8b8 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 456821b8aa 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c9c45ee91a 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards 0523a6123b 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 3f198b159c 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 92b7c6fec0 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 59af41d2d0 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards b60c04ea12 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 39a250d8bb 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards 091ea92f47 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 2f5607802a 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 5126c2ca47 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards a6f9f73372 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards 52524c4b9c 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 4716704ca5 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards 995e7275e3 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 84b272e478 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new a77a75cd8a 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 84394f85d2 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 3f0c467af0 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new aeb31431da 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new c0588bd02c 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new d378186922 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new acae9ecfc8 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new c13673b4ca 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 90611f7f0f 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new 63a23f2e2d 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new e94ceae434 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 9da4dd7aaf 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 11b7103e25 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 8358eb5b12 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 28ac7a579a 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 19bb7ae4ce 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5d0eda2cba 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 15c5ae9269 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new ce5c5cf948 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new da9c24a0b2 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 61b32f2139 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new cb9994fa6f 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new e298e01120 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 00a90dd00f 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fb9b416fe1 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5149d7a33e 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new 113cda5df9 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 972762383b 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new a84479f535 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new ece4e463af 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new 6d159b9b1b 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new 478572988c 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 0855317ccd 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new f1813e78f2 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new b19c9ccc81 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new 24949a27a3 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 2a6779a3c9 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new badd6efd75 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new 6979b80826 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new fc9fa84120 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 1800d5526c 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 530c907939 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 76f6815023 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c7f951291c 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new e58bdd7c0c 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new f37c86800e 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new 53d0a96c8e 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 2eed42d756 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new d46048670e 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new 294387476c 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 54f4589c47 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2db90c0f01 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5b76040ae3 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new 6ad58aea87 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new 81e9d54953 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new 39cfd27bb4 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new af934a7e95 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new cc4640cac8 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new d77ff99b8e 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new cc5fc609fb 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new ea3e9e8e31 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new d4cf7073c1 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new ba47326a37 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new de840f11b6 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 12efc149e6 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 43fe71d8b9 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new a7541a65c3 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new d01b893f28 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 705600d0f8 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new a6fead861b 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5e58056f37 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 3cb2638b43 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new fd9181b3f9 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new dc281de649 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new 1f87f79148 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 44c5b73771 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 9abaa08d82 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 8d91dfd435 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new e8fe17504f 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 1d6cf37bb0 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 6b24713cc5 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 377476c937 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 9424b9823f 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new b9a74b0cd7 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 3bdf663bb5 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new c7acaf7474 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 2c61223e9d 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 16a9e69ffd 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 85fb0f5f5d 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 253b55f7cf 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f2c58c69c9 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new d33dd93a74 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c9f9d7da38 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 5439ac4452 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 20b9686c58 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 0daa35ae2e onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new ad33e19122 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new bac31224fb onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 921b2ae7c1 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 532825f2c7 onsuccess: #99: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new ddd22fc8e9 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (0693aca8e8) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2020 -> 2280 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2596 -> 2660 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27564 -> 28068 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17812 -> 17900 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 92276 -> 92744 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 71648 -> 71992 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8664 -> 7896 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233360 -> 235256 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185644 -> 185952 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 214056 -> 214500 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 181616 -> 180512 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 112 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 110 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 7808 -> 8084 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 150 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 3116 -> 3124 bytes 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 424 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 6 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 12 +- manifest.sh | 8 +- notify/jira/comments.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 27 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- notify/notify-full.log | 330 +- notify/notify-init.log | 161 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 184 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3241 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 831124 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 821633 ++++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28524 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 70 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 178 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3403 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 785141 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 775170 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28566 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 70 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 3471 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 154 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4258 +- results_id | 2 +- 48 files changed, 1597828 insertions(+), 1689801 deletions(-)