This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-aarch64-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-aarch64-master-O3_LTO.

discards 3c77954 onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 25500f4 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0eecc8d onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7955fec onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 53d8140 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7cf737c onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7e6b62e onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards cc54fa9 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7127b7a onsuccess: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1b5c9fc onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b972b7e onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 31b594d onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8122d6a onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8dd8095 force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards bd15885 force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 76dab17 90: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 374ae72 89: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b615bf6 88: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 4acf9d6 87: force: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3a6fa48 86: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c360871 85: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e0459e4 84: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 099fea4 83: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 8726ab4 82: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9ea2ee1 81: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 879bf91 80: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b418d1a 79: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 47f858d 78: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 88e2732 77: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b30ec09 76: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 03727bb 75: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 63a95b4 74: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards cf31f0f 73: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 1257 commits discards 07f18b7 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 285 commits discards 93ae2dc 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits discards 94d3f47 70: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] discards dc9946e 69: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench slowed down by 5% a [...] discards e22bd6f 68: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 454 commits discards a97eefc 67: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 216 commits discards c30f3d7 66: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 391 commits discards 40ece82 65: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 159 commits discards a0bb07c 64: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 487 commits discards 8810fd3 63: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 711 commits discards 44fe86f 62: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9c1bbca 61: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 7c24074 60: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 454d6a1 59: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 6b3b644 58: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d83b72d 57: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a88e58d 56: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 68df823 55: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 9336c33 54: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc: [...] discards 8f2c97d 53: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -5% [...] discards f052a68 52: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 25d0b1a 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 07b332d 50: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 1b735cd 49: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 65ddadf 48: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/llvm [...] discards 841eed1 47: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2a1fa24 46: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c5f8458 45: onsuccess: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII speeds up by -4% [...] discards 25e00fe 44: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9d82ce5 43: onsuccess: #509: 1: [TCWG CI] 470.lbm speeds up by -11% a [...] discards d311648 42: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards 9df8d71 41: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 3dc32cb 40: onsuccess: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] discards 2dae4da 39: onsuccess: #502: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7da0aa9 38: onsuccess: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng speeds up by -5% [...] discards 685d70c 37: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc run OK after binuti [...] discards 37228a3 36: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits discards 777e831 35: force: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to run after wor [...] discards 5ee0a67 34: force: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 191 commits discards 8218903 33: onsuccess: #493: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 870397b 32: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 667c98d 31: onsuccess: #490: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a2e618c 30: onsuccess: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards cb75efa 29: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d9ca7dc 28: onsuccess: #486: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 441f4dd 27: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards df2ce42 26: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4c94cd2 25: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 04dc0c2 24: onsuccess: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4c12e67 23: onsuccess: #470: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK [...] discards d78cd72 22: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards af2d7be 21: onsuccess: #468: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 28323ad 20: onsuccess: #466: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 5dffaf7 19: onsuccess: #464: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 125 commits discards abdec6b 18: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build afte [...] discards 3199e60 17: force: #462: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 95 commits discards be50fa0 16: force: #459: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-16-init [...] discards e0fd375 15: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 117 commits discards 7afad4f 14: onsuccess: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 008d493 13: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] discards 1aefaa4 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards c51e37a 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards a741dff 10: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 64923c1 9: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/glibc [...] discards 819f0e5 8: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/gl [...] discards 3a42871 7: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc-llvm: 1 discards ca9d739 6: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc-llvm: 1 new 2a9fa53 6: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc-llvm: 1 new df2b004 7: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc-llvm: 1 new c94c1b2 8: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/gl [...] new cf0f0f2 9: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/glibc [...] new 526e420 10: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 8491923 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 42fc5b8 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 7828e98 13: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] new 65f3457 14: onsuccess: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a0320e1 15: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 117 commits new a057e9c 16: force: #459: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-16-init [...] new 012e4f1 17: force: #462: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 95 commits new 2a016ac 18: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build afte [...] new a384c37 19: onsuccess: #464: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 125 commits new 8362308 20: onsuccess: #466: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 5f305ee 21: onsuccess: #468: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2877428 22: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a034819 23: onsuccess: #470: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK [...] new 9f519db 24: onsuccess: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 09b8a1c 25: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0518821 26: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 50568c2 27: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ecddb20 28: onsuccess: #486: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1170401 29: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ae6fa5f 30: onsuccess: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4dcfb66 31: onsuccess: #490: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a00036a 32: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 86d554d 33: onsuccess: #493: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 56ceb0b 34: force: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 191 commits new aca65a2 35: force: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to run after wor [...] new 9cd40e0 36: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits new 549f777 37: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc run OK after binuti [...] new 2a5fdc2 38: onsuccess: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng speeds up by -5% [...] new 701a97c 39: onsuccess: #502: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6338ead 40: onsuccess: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] new 212afb5 41: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new c51daa2 42: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new f681af3 43: onsuccess: #509: 1: [TCWG CI] 470.lbm speeds up by -11% a [...] new 3a94a8e 44: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6b9f385 45: onsuccess: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII speeds up by -4% [...] new 439970c 46: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4f25d50 47: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ba4f857 48: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/llvm [...] new fbab47a 49: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 15de192 50: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 7536093 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 9d1f0b4 52: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new a881030 53: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -5% [...] new ccd2de7 54: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc: [...] new f9c47d9 55: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 1174289 56: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new d88e1e0 57: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new eab20e5 58: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5f38403 59: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ed06a0f 60: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 32f99bb 61: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 581202a 62: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ad2bbec 63: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 711 commits new 5d6052a 64: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 487 commits new 5784dbc 65: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 159 commits new 55eca6f 66: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 391 commits new 1620888 67: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 216 commits new 3109e82 68: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 454 commits new b1a035d 69: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench slowed down by 5% a [...] new 0437515 70: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] new 9abbd72 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits new 816899f 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 285 commits new a0b6fc8 73: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 1257 commits new 36d5950 74: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new aba2708 75: onsuccess: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 60fef8c 76: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new df7f2ae 77: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 74f85bc 78: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a205f2a 79: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 951fd08 80: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 4c29e79 81: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 243c132 82: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 043429c 83: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new c10c3f4 84: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 04b5d18 85: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 839d95f 86: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c1f7137 87: force: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 27a21cc 88: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 41d0c48 89: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f424376 90: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 016d5e5 force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new 17fdaee force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new c099bae onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4c6b21b onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new bb3e9a2 onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 130ce59 onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0ca4b36 onsuccess: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 37d2abc onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c9538a6 onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6122fbb onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new adfeb6a onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a305891 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 608a0bc onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0a64305 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 17da83f onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 851c263 onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (3c77954) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: .gitignore | 1 - 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2184 -> 2392 bytes 02-build_bmk_llvm/console.log.xz | Bin 108900 -> 106060 bytes 03-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 115 +- 03-benchmark/benchmark.log | 113 +- 03-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 6408 -> 3328 bytes 04-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 5488 -> 5508 bytes 04-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 48 +- annex/bmk-data | 1 + git/llvm_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 1308 +- jenkins/notify-init.log | 72 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 22 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 6 +- manifest.sh | 4 +- notify/jira/comments.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 16 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- results | 2 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 58 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 24 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 102 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 306 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 11976 +++++----- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 20 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 28 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 102 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 136 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 27600 +++++++++++----------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 22 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 48 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 114 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 58 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 58 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 28 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 58 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3434 +-- results_id | 1 - 39 files changed, 22493 insertions(+), 23396 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 .gitignore create mode 100644 annex/bmk-data delete mode 100644 results_id