This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards a2be295e19 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 592f65f5af 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1cab60fc5b 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards f1d4708f05 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards f72c7e3266 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 7d808d9c2f 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards ad8cb542f5 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards f39a2621b5 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards 85792adaec 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 4567f740ce 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards 8c359238a7 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 16d0faf46d 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 72688102b3 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards ed2c459952 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 51b7e6ce3c 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 96580ef93e 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards e1ce59f5e4 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fde24ee9e8 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5e525f7a31 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards c427930827 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards eb43393dcc 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 298cd10da8 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards be9cdce410 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 5af7763208 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards bdf0e49e67 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards fda6c8192e 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards f7166c96f9 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 4d36e6855d 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards db70477398 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 7c44e698d6 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 755fdf8652 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1638d8a25f 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 7816dc855b 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards fd41cbb0f3 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 427d70ccbe 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 7476761821 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards 85dbd324b2 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 82cadd6ad1 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 7d60dc4f19 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards db4a5d969e 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 7c9f88aef7 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards d5fe0a918e 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 71afd3fb16 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards e7a1ac7f7a 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards ce5f23306e 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 91af50bc4f 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 8f28feba76 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards 7e37132c7b 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards af6b03cdfe 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards d964731cb1 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 173000a84d 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards 41d48c0e61 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards 770a7a084a 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 700a16579b 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards a1b1d83406 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 66562e7a97 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards 6cfe865213 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a83e4889ab 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c3ce9d70e2 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 3663f22278 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 7b54284e3a 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards c148f593d3 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards b768bc19ff 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards de792756ba 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards ffa9cb7c0f 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards aa15038689 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2e2b41664a 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards c97dc1621f 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 945512ce19 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 015d090822 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 4877e094ff 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 81dda0df12 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 91b92ed40d 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards 7a12012eae 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 954b088e2b 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 89404a3de2 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards b26b2ecdfb 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards bebd696698 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards b4b58be96d 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards b97c2101cf 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 2ff384172a 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e6ab7ef5b2 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 78af5a2926 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 8e88226ab6 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 7ef8c08e8a 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2e88326568 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 7f574f14e9 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards 838d687d6c 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards ec9d351d3c 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] discards 3a2eb48fa5 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards a7362ad306 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards a52dae0eba 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 5fac04a204 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards dc62addf3e 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits discards 2322893263 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 9c578c73ee 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 4e11c767ec 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] discards e2070d35dc 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deli [...] discards 32fe2c5b7d 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 06b7f32363 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 671ac4c820 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 00b5c29794 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b38f2d0bb3 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new f8c07d53ad 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 978ac1ad8b 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deli [...] new 9c52511998 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] new 7c4d31a0c2 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 1d9476e2c6 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new f79df60dd5 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new 095635db95 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new 41941a1010 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new ec6645d792 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 2c9d72050b 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 5a0f7a0350 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] new 4b4921cefd 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new f21c1b06d6 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new eec2eedce9 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 244c8eca53 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 645f92784e 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new a304296109 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new a294aacf5d 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new d042a6039f 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new cedfd8bfd2 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 5db36dc757 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new 7d5c995919 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new a18eb29db7 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new fb8b6ae099 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 28ac31acb5 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new bd33ca4ba4 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new f5463477c7 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new 01054a5905 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 51705f16d4 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new eef2fda060 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 25c137269b 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new b5320d92d5 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new d87ee02da5 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 85c594c049 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 129164e502 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new a1d9641ed1 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 61efa8913b 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 718ff0e62e 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new ec4c096acd 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new a2c3eeef66 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 6fd5c73a2e 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new fa9d55f550 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 775d57ce85 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 07058c4963 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new bdb0633197 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 1c6f672202 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 3a803d7be8 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 36a70e2fac 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new aecdc923c3 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new 70a98e1a9f 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 5634b774cb 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 632b2b7bda 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new fb80110015 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new 0f99fa991c 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 549b50e94e 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 4cbb69c7b5 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new d528ab3a48 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new a141d6c68b 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new f659bffd91 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new e44afd21db 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 6cb903d59a 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new bee1679bdc 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new da2b03d34e 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 1f32e31396 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new 9b031a1257 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 36ec69efb8 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 46af8160a2 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new 2f0e1bce68 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new a8cabd38e3 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fa7d8aa0b9 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new faac5c51c4 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new 1e6331cc34 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new 757eeae71d 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new 8d01876a2e 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new cbc8869251 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new ae40bf4413 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new b3a83bf8a1 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 5e6c9eb9b9 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new ebceac3c9d 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new cb0cee0fb3 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 3f0ecd53b6 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 86703b83cc 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new acf9c1dfb0 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b3451e8208 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 9c8648f1d3 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new 460ea28124 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 6eae1d1f69 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new b19ac10a97 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d6eba919d2 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 467ca5468c 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new 6a2a30abfd 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new 8872853522 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new 4820c2f3a6 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 6e9e045f66 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 8ea5f0cb0e 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 5fc03166ce 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 0c9c4f75bf 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 757e7d95e1 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new cd015eb5eb 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new e672bbf382 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (a2be295e19) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2044 -> 2012 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2448 -> 2492 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27540 -> 27888 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90428 -> 90424 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7564 -> 8488 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234336 -> 233456 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 213292 -> 212724 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 185 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 183 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4276 -> 4200 bytes 10-check_regression/471.omnetpp.symbols-skipped | 1 + 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 179 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 16368 -> 19352 bytes 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 10 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 5 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 2 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 66 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/notify.sh | 3 - manifest.sh | 32 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 234 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2788 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 710650 ++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 713982 ++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28946 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 64 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3030 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3391 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 752167 ++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 766140 +++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28880 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 65 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 124 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3311 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 248 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 248 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3364 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 241 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 13 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2999 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3381 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 785752 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 799789 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28172 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 76 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3034 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3391 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 752167 ++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 766140 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28880 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 65 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 124 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3481 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 252 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 252 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4012 +- results_id | 2 +- 67 files changed, 3054740 insertions(+), 3145931 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/471.omnetpp.symbols-skipped create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff delete mode 100755 jenkins/notify.sh