On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 09:16:06AM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
On 6/10/25 7:05 PM, Da Xue wrote:
static int ad7949_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi) {
- u32 spi_ctrl_mask = spi->controller->bits_per_word_mask;
- u64 spi_ctrl_mask = spi->controller->bits_per_word_mask;
I think this driver is incorrectly accessing bits_per_word_mask directly and should be using spi_is_bpw_supported() instead.
Yes, that'd be an improvemnet.