Laurent Pinchart,
Thanks for your feedback.
I see your point regarding the complexity of the current construct. I’ll take some time to consider the best approach and follow up once I have a clearer picture.
Masaharu Noguchi
On Sat, Aug 30, 2025 at 11:29:23PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
The fact that we need such a complicated construct is a sign that there's something wrong in our APIs. The above code is too complicated for what it does, making it less readable, more difficult to maintain, and more bug-prone. I don't know if we need yet another sprintf variant in the kernel, or something else, but this doens't seem to be what we need.
}
-- Regards,
Laurent Pinchart