Yes! I build and clean and build and clean and build again, everything seems fine from the compiler side and posttest task as well. Everything seems ok.
Thanks, - Juan José
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:50 AM Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 01:58:34AM -0500, Juan José Arboleda wrote:
The macro `gb_loopback_stats_attrs` in the Greybus loopback driver contains multiple statements, which should be enclosed in a do-while loop to ensure proper execution and adhere to coding standards.
This patch modifies the `gb_loopback_stats_attrs` macro to enclose its statements in a do-while loop, addressing the style error flagged by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Juan José Arboleda soyjuanarbol@gmail.com
drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
index 4313d3bbc23a..a97de86c67a5 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c @@ -163,9 +163,11 @@ static ssize_t name##_avg_show(struct device *dev,
\static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name##_avg)
#define gb_loopback_stats_attrs(field) \
gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, min, u); \gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, max, u); \gb_loopback_ro_avg_attr(field)
do { \gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, min, u); \gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, max, u); \gb_loopback_ro_avg_attr(field); \} while (0)#define gb_loopback_attr(field, type)
\static ssize_t field##_show(struct device *dev,
\Are you sure you test-built this change?
thanks,
greg k-h