27 Jan
2017
27 Jan
'17
1:08 p.m.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 03:47:21PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
The name sucks is what I'm saying. Please fix it eventually.
I disagree. The name uses a common prefix that reflects the object it is working on. This should not be changed. As it is currently named, the function is also self-documenting. Trying to abbreviate the name just to meet a 80 col limit (when there are alternatives) is just silly.
Johan