Linaro-uefi

linaro-uefi@lists.linaro.org

811 discussions

Re: [Linaro-uefi] [RFC] arm: efi: handle zImage relocation

by Ard Biesheuvel

On 22 January 2015 at 14:33, Olivier Martin <olivier.martin(a)arm.com> wrote: > I guess the reason why I initially did this 'hack' (mark the DRAM occupied > by the FD as non-present) is because the DXE (or something else) was copying > over the FD during the dispatching of the UEFI drivers. > You might not see this issue with your implementation of MemoryInitPeiLib > because UEFI drivers will be loaded way above the FD file. But the risk > might still exist - except if the DXE core now takes care of this case. > So which part of the FD file would we still be using at DXE time? And couldn't we use ConvertPages() to turn it into boot services code instead of removing it entirely? >> -----Original Message----- >> From: linaro-uefi-bounces(a)lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-uefi- >> bounces(a)lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Ard Biesheuvel >> Sent: 19 January 2015 17:34 >> To: Varad Gautam >> Cc: Linaro UEFI Mailman List >> Subject: Re: [Linaro-uefi] [RFC] arm: efi: handle zImage relocation >> >> On 19 January 2015 at 17:28, Varad Gautam <varadgautam(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > On 01/19/15 at 05:21 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel(a)linaro.org> >> wrote: >> >> > The current implementation fails in `handle_kernel_image()` when >> UEFI >> >> > finds a discontinuity in the memory map during >> `allocate_pages()`[1]. >> >> > This patch >> >> Footnote? >> > >> > :) >> > http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-uefi/2015- >> January/000645.html >> > >> >> The current ARM port in Tianocore does not deal very well with a flash >> device in RAM. It assumes you are shadowing from flash if it detects >> that PrePi is running from RAM. >> >> I hit something similar here >> https://git.linaro.org/people/ard.biesheuvel/uefi- >> next.git/commit/470ecd1480880a80bbb29077a22a3e640d9633f7 >> >> So how do you load the UEFI image? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linaro-uefi mailing list >> Linaro-uefi(a)lists.linaro.org >> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-uefi > > > >

10 years, 2 months

Intel BDS on QEMU64

by Roy Franz

Hi Leif, I working on wrapping up the last details on my iSCSI wiki page (https://wiki.linaro.org/LEG/Engineering/Kernel/UEFI/UEFI_ISCSI) and have found a couple of issues. 1) I seem to be unable to save new boot menu entries. I can change the order, and that persists. The iSCSI configuration itself persists, but new menu entries themselves don't seem to. I also can't seem to delete any. 2) In the "change boot order" menu, there is no menu item to save the config, only the "F10=save". F10 exits the menu, but does not seem to save it, as the "Configuration changed" stays up. When you try to exit the boot maintenance manager it prompts you to save the data. Have you encountered either of these? Roy

10 years, 2 months

[PATCH v2 0/5] ArmPlatformPkg: Add Lan91x Dxe driver, and networking support for A15/A15 MPcore/FVP AArch64

by fu.wei＠linaro.org

From: Fu Wei <fu.wei(a)linaro.org> Add a driver for the SMSC Lan91x Ethernet controllers, such as the 91C111 emulated in the ARM RTSM development simulators Add support for including the SMSC LAN 91C111 driver support by specifying the EDK2_ENABLE_SMSC_91X build variable. If build with "-D EDK2_ENABLE_SMSC_91X=1" , the driver will be added. A per-platform addition to the .fdf is also required to actually include the driver and network protocol support in the produced image. Add conditionalised networking support for FVP AArch64 RTSM A15 RTSM A15 MPcore This repo is including all the patches: https://git.linaro.org/people/fu.wei/uefi.git/shortlog/refs/heads/LAN91x_Dx… Fu Wei (2): ArmPlatformPkg: Add conditionalised networking support for RTSM A15 MPcore ArmPlatformPkg: Add conditionalised networking support for RTSM A15 Leif Lindholm (2): ArmPlatformPkg: Add conditional inclusion of Lan91x ethernet support ArmPlatformPkg: Add conditionalised networking support for FVP AArch64 Reece R. Pollack (1): ArmPlatformPkg: Add Lan91x Dxe driver .../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-FVP-AArch64.fdf | 5 + .../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A15.fdf | 21 +- .../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A15_MPCore.fdf | 21 +- .../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-networking.fdf.inc | 28 + ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress.dsc.inc | 9 + EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxe.c | 2233 ++++++++++++++++++++ EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxe.inf | 58 + EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxeHw.h | 278 +++ EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec | 3 + 9 files changed, 2624 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) create mode 100644 ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-networking.fdf.inc create mode 100644 EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxe.c create mode 100644 EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxe.inf create mode 100644 EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxeHw.h -- 1.9.1

10 years, 2 months

Re: [Linaro-uefi] [PATCH 0/5] ArmPlatformPkg: Add Lan91x Dxe driver, and networking support for A15/A15 MPcore/FVP AArch64

by Leif Lindholm

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:36:23AM -0000, Olivier Martin wrote: > Any reason to make the Network stack conditional? > One reason to make the SMSC Lan91x Ethernet controller condition on some > RTSM models is to use the virtio network driver instead. > But I am quite keen to get network support by default. I like configurability. If we want to see UEFI in more embedded/mobile devices, we need more of it. Both in EDK2 and the ones held in Linaro's tree - but especially the ones in EDK2. Because people who create new ports will look at existing ones for guidance. And since I hide my build flags in a config file[1] and don't need to worry about remembering them, it doesn't cause overhead for me. So "by default" becomes a philosophical statement. By default, I get networking support when I build the models. / Leif [1] https://git.linaro.org/uefi/uefi-tools.git/blob/HEAD:/platforms.config > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linaro-uefi-bounces(a)lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-uefi- > > bounces(a)lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of fu.wei(a)linaro.org > > Sent: 27 January 2015 02:08 > > To: edk2-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net; linaro-uefi(a)lists.linaro.org > > Subject: [Linaro-uefi] [PATCH 0/5] ArmPlatformPkg: Add Lan91x Dxe > > driver, and networking support for A15/A15 MPcore/FVP AArch64 > > > > From: Fu Wei <fu.wei(a)linaro.org> > > > > Add a driver for the SMSC Lan91x Ethernet controllers, such as > > the 91C111 emulated in the ARM RTSM development simulators > > > > Add support for including the SMSC LAN 91C111 driver support > > by specifying the EDK2_ENABLE_SMSC_91X build variable. > > A per-platform addition to the .fdf is also required to actually > > include > > the driver and network protocol support in the produced image. > > > > Add conditionalised networking support for > > FVP AArch64 > > RTSM A15 > > RTSM A15 MPcore > > > > This repo is including all the patches: > > https://git.linaro.org/people/fu.wei/uefi.git/shortlog/refs/heads/LAN91 > > x_Dxe_driver_upstream > > > > Fu Wei (2): > > ArmPlatformPkg: Add conditionalised networking support for RTSM A15 > > MPcore > > ArmPlatformPkg: Add conditionalised networking support for RTSM A15 > > > > Leif Lindholm (2): > > ArmPlatformPkg: Add conditional inclusion of Lan91x ethernet support > > ArmPlatformPkg: Add conditionalised networking support for FVP > > AArch64 > > > > Reece R. Pollack (1): > > ArmPlatformPkg: Add Lan91x Dxe driver > > > > .../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-FVP-AArch64.fdf | 5 + > > .../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A15.fdf | 21 +- > > .../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A15_MPCore.fdf | 21 +- > > .../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-networking.fdf.inc | 28 + > > ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress.dsc.inc | 9 + > > EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxe.c | 2233 > > ++++++++++++++++++++ > > EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxe.inf | 58 + > > EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxeHw.h | 278 +++ > > EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec | 3 + > > 9 files changed, 2624 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress- > > networking.fdf.inc > > create mode 100644 EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxe.c > > create mode 100644 EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxe.inf > > create mode 100644 EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxeHw.h > > > > -- > > 1.8.3.1 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linaro-uefi mailing list > > Linaro-uefi(a)lists.linaro.org > > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-uefi > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linaro-uefi mailing list > Linaro-uefi(a)lists.linaro.org > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-uefi

10 years, 3 months

[PATCH 0/5] ArmPlatformPkg: Add Lan91x Dxe driver, and networking support for A15/A15 MPcore/FVP AArch64

by fu.wei＠linaro.org

From: Fu Wei <fu.wei(a)linaro.org> Add a driver for the SMSC Lan91x Ethernet controllers, such as the 91C111 emulated in the ARM RTSM development simulators Add support for including the SMSC LAN 91C111 driver support by specifying the EDK2_ENABLE_SMSC_91X build variable. A per-platform addition to the .fdf is also required to actually include the driver and network protocol support in the produced image. Add conditionalised networking support for FVP AArch64 RTSM A15 RTSM A15 MPcore This repo is including all the patches: https://git.linaro.org/people/fu.wei/uefi.git/shortlog/refs/heads/LAN91x_Dx… Fu Wei (2): ArmPlatformPkg: Add conditionalised networking support for RTSM A15 MPcore ArmPlatformPkg: Add conditionalised networking support for RTSM A15 Leif Lindholm (2): ArmPlatformPkg: Add conditional inclusion of Lan91x ethernet support ArmPlatformPkg: Add conditionalised networking support for FVP AArch64 Reece R. Pollack (1): ArmPlatformPkg: Add Lan91x Dxe driver .../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-FVP-AArch64.fdf | 5 + .../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A15.fdf | 21 +- .../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A15_MPCore.fdf | 21 +- .../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-networking.fdf.inc | 28 + ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress.dsc.inc | 9 + EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxe.c | 2233 ++++++++++++++++++++ EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxe.inf | 58 + EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxeHw.h | 278 +++ EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec | 3 + 9 files changed, 2624 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) create mode 100644 ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-networking.fdf.inc create mode 100644 EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxe.c create mode 100644 EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxe.inf create mode 100644 EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxeHw.h -- 1.8.3.1

10 years, 3 months

[PATCH 0/5] ArmPlatformPkg: Add Lan91x Dxe driver, and networking support for A15/A15 MPcore/FVP AArch64

by fu.wei＠linaro.org

From: Fu Wei <fu.wei(a)linaro.org> Add a driver for the SMSC Lan91x Ethernet controllers, such as the 91C111 emulated in the ARM RTSM development simulators Add support for including the SMSC LAN 91C111 driver support by specifying the EDK2_ENABLE_SMSC_91X build variable. A per-platform addition to the .fdf is also required to actually include the driver and network protocol support in the produced image. Add conditionalised networking support for FVP AArch64 RTSM A15 RTSM A15 MPcore This repo is including all the patches: https://git.linaro.org/people/fu.wei/uefi.git/shortlog/refs/heads/LAN91x_Dx… Fu Wei (2): ArmPlatformPkg: Add conditionalised networking support for RTSM A15 MPcore ArmPlatformPkg: Add conditionalised networking support for RTSM A15 Leif Lindholm (2): ArmPlatformPkg: Add conditional inclusion of Lan91x ethernet support ArmPlatformPkg: Add conditionalised networking support for FVP AArch64 Reece R. Pollack (1): ArmPlatformPkg: Add Lan91x Dxe driver .../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-FVP-AArch64.fdf | 5 + .../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A15.fdf | 21 +- .../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-RTSM-A15_MPCore.fdf | 21 +- .../ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-networking.fdf.inc | 28 + ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress.dsc.inc | 9 + EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxe.c | 2233 ++++++++++++++++++++ EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxe.inf | 58 + EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxeHw.h | 278 +++ EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec | 3 + 9 files changed, 2624 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) create mode 100644 ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress-networking.fdf.inc create mode 100644 EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxe.c create mode 100644 EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxe.inf create mode 100644 EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/Lan91xDxe/Lan91xDxeHw.h -- 1.8.3.1

10 years, 3 months

[RFC] arm: efi: handle zImage relocation

by Varad Gautam

Request low-memory from UEFI and relocate. Signed-off-by: Varad Gautam <varadgautam(a)gmail.com> --- A couple problems with the patch: * accessing `linux_banner` in `libstub/fdt.c:update_fdt` causes a Data Abort; need a better place to define it. * arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S: jump to zImage `mov pc, r3` fails, although jump to hard-coded relocated address (`ldr pc, =0x80008000`) works, 0x80008000 being the new zImage location. Need help with calling convention - am I setting *image_addr correctly? Thanks, Varad arch/arm/boot/compressed/efi-stub.c | 64 ++++++++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/efi-stub.c b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/efi-stub.c index 1341229..0364e95 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/efi-stub.c +++ b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/efi-stub.c @@ -21,10 +21,8 @@ efi_status_t handle_kernel_image(efi_system_table_t *sys_table, unsigned long dram_base, efi_loaded_image_t *image) { - unsigned long nr_pages; efi_status_t status; - /* Use alloc_addr to tranlsate between types */ - efi_physical_addr_t alloc_addr; + unsigned long kernel_size; /* * Verify that the DRAM base address is compatible the the ARM @@ -38,55 +36,21 @@ efi_status_t handle_kernel_image(efi_system_table_t *sys_table, return EFI_LOAD_ERROR; } - /* - * Reserve memory for the uncompressed kernel image. This is - * all that prevents any future allocations from conflicting - * with the kernel. Since we can't tell from the compressed - * image how much DRAM the kernel actually uses (due to BSS - * size uncertainty) we allocate the maximum possible size. - * Do this very early, as prints can cause memory allocations - * that may conflict with this. - */ - alloc_addr = dram_base; - *reserve_size = MAX_UNCOMP_KERNEL_SIZE; - nr_pages = round_up(*reserve_size, EFI_PAGE_SIZE) / EFI_PAGE_SIZE; - status = sys_table->boottime->allocate_pages(EFI_ALLOCATE_ADDRESS, - EFI_LOADER_DATA, - nr_pages, &alloc_addr); - if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) { - *reserve_size = 0; - pr_efi_err(sys_table, "Unable to allocate memory for uncompressed kernel.\n"); - return status; - } - *reserve_addr = alloc_addr; - - /* - * Relocate the zImage, if required. ARM doesn't have a - * preferred address, so we set it to 0, as we want to allocate - * as low in memory as possible. - */ + /* Relocate the image, if required. */ *image_size = image->image_size; - status = efi_relocate_kernel(sys_table, image_addr, *image_size, - *image_size, 0, 0); - if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) { - pr_efi_err(sys_table, "Failed to relocate kernel.\n"); - efi_free(sys_table, *reserve_size, *reserve_addr); - *reserve_size = 0; - return status; + if (*image_addr != (dram_base + TEXT_OFFSET)) { + kernel_size = *image_size; + status = efi_low_alloc(sys_table, kernel_size + TEXT_OFFSET, + EFI_PAGE_SIZE, reserve_addr); + if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) { + pr_efi_err(sys_table, "Failed to relocate kernel\n"); + return status; + } + memcpy((void *)(*reserve_addr + TEXT_OFFSET), image->image_base, + kernel_size); + *image_addr = *reserve_addr + TEXT_OFFSET; + *reserve_size = kernel_size + TEXT_OFFSET; } - /* - * Check to see if we were able to allocate memory low enough - * in memory. The kernel determines the base of DRAM from the - * address at which the zImage is loaded. - */ - if (*image_addr + *image_size > dram_base + ZIMAGE_OFFSET_LIMIT) { - pr_efi_err(sys_table, "Failed to relocate kernel, no low memory available.\n"); - efi_free(sys_table, *reserve_size, *reserve_addr); - *reserve_size = 0; - efi_free(sys_table, *image_size, *image_addr); - *image_size = 0; - return EFI_LOAD_ERROR; - } return EFI_SUCCESS; } -- 2.1.2

10 years, 3 months

[Patch v2] firmware: dmi_scan: use full dmi version for SMBIOS3

by Ivan Khoronzhuk

New SMBIOS3 spec adds additional field for versioning - docrev. The docrev identifies the revision of a specification implemented in the table structures, so display SMBIOS version > 3 in format, like: 3.22.1 It's not affect on other part of code because version number is analyzed using comparing, and it's obvious that 0x000208 is less than 0x030201 for example. Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk(a)linaro.org> --- v1: http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-uefi/2015-January/000697.html v2..v1: didn't use additional array drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c b/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c index c5f7b4e..c54982e 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ */ static const char dmi_empty_string[] = " "; -static u16 __initdata dmi_ver; +static u32 dmi_ver __initdata; /* * Catch too early calls to dmi_check_system(): */ @@ -527,7 +527,8 @@ static int __init dmi_smbios3_present(const u8 *buf) { if (memcmp(buf, "_SM3_", 5) == 0 && buf[6] < 32 && dmi_checksum(buf, buf[6])) { - dmi_ver = get_unaligned_be16(buf + 7); + dmi_ver = get_unaligned_be32(buf + 6); + dmi_ver &= 0xFFFFFF; dmi_len = get_unaligned_le32(buf + 12); dmi_base = get_unaligned_le64(buf + 16); @@ -544,8 +545,9 @@ static int __init dmi_smbios3_present(const u8 *buf) dmi_num = dmi_len / 4; if (dmi_walk_early(dmi_decode) == 0) { - pr_info("SMBIOS %d.%d present.\n", - dmi_ver >> 8, dmi_ver & 0xFF); + pr_info("SMBIOS %d.%d.%d present.\n", + dmi_ver >> 16, (dmi_ver >> 8) & 0xFF, + dmi_ver & 0xFF); dmi_format_ids(dmi_ids_string, sizeof(dmi_ids_string)); pr_debug("DMI: %s\n", dmi_ids_string); return 0; -- 1.9.1

10 years, 3 months

[leg-kernel/linux-next] [Patch v2 0/2] firmware: dmi-sysfs: add SMBIOS

by Ivan Khoronzhuk

Some utils, like dmidecode and smbios, needs to access SMBIOS entry table area in order to get information like SMBIOS version, size, etc. Currently it's done via /dev/mem. But for situation when /dev/mem usage is disabled, the utils have to use dmi sysfs instead, which doesn't represent SMBIOS entry. So this patch series adds SMBIOS area to dmi sysfs in order to allow utils in question to work correctly with dmi sysfs. v1: http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-uefi/2015-January/000671.html v2..v1: firmware: dmi_scan: add symbol to get SMBIOS entry area - used static array instead of remapping base address - removed extern attribute in header firmware: dmi-sysfs: add SMBIOS entry point area attribute - got SMBIOS table and it's size at init time - moved smbios raw attribute creation after dmi_scan. - read internal array to get SMBIOS table in read funcion - renamed attribute to "smbios_raw_header" instead of smbios_raw Ivan Khoronzhuk (2): firmware: dmi_scan: add symbol to get SMBIOS entry area firmware: dmi-sysfs: add SMBIOS entry point area attribute drivers/firmware/dmi-sysfs.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/dmi.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+) -- 1.9.1

10 years, 3 months

[leg-kernel/linux-next] [Patch 0/2] firmware: dmi-sysfs: add SMBIOS

by Ivan Khoronzhuk

10 years, 3 months

← Newer
1
...
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
...
82
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

Linaro-uefi