在 12/4/2017 9:32 AM, Wu, Hao A 写道:
Comments below.
Best Regards, Hao Wu
-----Original Message----- From: Zeng, Star Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 9:17 AM To: Heyi Guo; linaro-uefi@lists.linaro.org; edk2-devel@lists.01.org Cc: Heyi Guo; Dong, Eric; Wu, Hao A; Ni, Ruiyu; Zeng, Star Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/NvmExpressDxe: fix error status override
Cc Hao and Ruiyu.
Thanks, Star -----Original Message----- From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Heyi Guo Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 5:22 PM To: linaro-uefi@lists.linaro.org; edk2-devel@lists.01.org Cc: Heyi Guo guoheyi@huawei.com; Heyi Guo heyi.guo@linaro.org; Dong, Eric eric.dong@intel.com; Zeng, Star star.zeng@intel.com Subject: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/NvmExpressDxe: fix error status override
Commit f6b139b added return status handling to PciIo->Mem.Write. However, the second status handling will override EFI_DEVICE_ERROR returned in this branch:
// // Check the NVMe cmd execution result // if (Status != EFI_TIMEOUT) { if ((Cq->Sct == 0) && (Cq->Sc == 0)) { Status = EFI_SUCCESS; } else { Status = EFI_DEVICE_ERROR; ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Since PciIo->Mem.Write will probably return SUCCESS, it causes NvmExpressPassThru to return SUCCESS even when DEVICE_ERROR occurs. Callers of NvmExpressPassThru will then continue executing which may cause further unexpected results, e.g. DiscoverAllNamespaces couldn't break out the loop.
So we add a | (bit-or) to combine the return status together.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo guoheyi@huawei.com Cc: Star Zeng star.zeng@intel.com Cc: Eric Dong eric.dong@intel.com
MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpressPassthru.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpressPassthru.c b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpressPassthru.c index c33038f..2698b27 100644 --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpressPassthru.c +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpressPassthru.c @@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ NvmExpressPassThru ( }
Data = ReadUnaligned32 ((UINT32*)&Private->CqHdbl[QueueId]);
- Status = PciIo->Mem.Write (
- Status |= PciIo->Mem.Write ( PciIo, EfiPciIoWidthUint32, NVME_BAR,
I searched the whole edk2 code base and did not find a similar case like: Status |= Foo();
I also think using the above style might cause the function returning confusing status to the caller.
That's true.
So how about introducing a new variable? EFI_STATUS PreviousStatus; ... Data = ReadUnaligned32 ((UINT32*)&Private->CqHdbl[QueueId]); PreviousStatus = Status; Status = PciIo->Mem.Write (...); Status = EFI_ERROR (PreviousStatus) ? PreviousStatus : Status;
Looks good to me. I will send out v2 patch. Thanks for your comments.
Regards,
Gary (Heyi Guo)
-- 2.7.2.windows.1
edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel