Hello,
As a heads-up for CBuild/LAVA integration project,
http://ec2-54-243-13-36.compute-1.amazonaws.com/helpers/scheduler is now
available, which has initial(?) web frontend integration with LAVA.
That page (currently) shows job "gcc-linaro-4.6-2012.09.job", submitted
against queue "lava-panda-mock", with a link to latest build in LAVA
(extra feature, I couldn't find a way in CBuild frontend to get to
native build results).
If you want to try it yourself, it's accessible to same TCWG people as
http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/ , plus me, Stevan, and Danilo. So,
if you're not in list, please drop us a line. "Spawn" and "Bump up"
actions support integration with LAVA currently. We're in the process
of identifying what other features of web frontend would require LAVA
integration, hints from TCWG are appreciated.
Now a bit about architecture. We're targetting to support both native
CBuild and LAVA schedulers. This is per-queue, i.e. one queue can use
native scheduler and another LAVA. LAVA is detected by the presence of
LAVA job definition template file in a scheduler queue dir:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~linaro-infrastructure/cbuild/cbuild-scheduler_…
lava-test-shell script with actual commands to run for build is also
served by CBuild frontend based on a template in that dir.
Currently, sandbox defines 3 test queue for LAVA integration:
lava-panda - build something on panda (tested only with gcc, needs more
work)
lava-panda-mock - doesn't really compiles stuff, just downloads snapshot
of previous gcc build. This allows for quicker (~15min) turnaround
during testing, if you test snadbox, please use this queue.
lava-qemu-mininal - for local development with even shorter turnaround,
won't work on sandbox.
If you have any feedback on the architecture above, please share it.
Otherwise, we're proceeding to support it in cbuild-tools.
--
Best Regards,
Paul
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linarohttp://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
Hi all,
I was just discussing IPv6 with Philip Colmer, our new IT Services Manager (cc'd on this mail), and it strikes me that we should at least be considering dual running at some point in the future, i.e. providing both v4 and v6. I'm not clear what the ramifications are, or as yet whether Zen will support it. Philip has experience with this, and seems to remember that Zen do support it, but I'll bang an e-mail out to them to check.
The reason for this e-mail is to start a discussion as to whether we think it's worth raising a BP, or if we can ignore this issue.
Thoughts, comments and brickbats welcome.
Thanks
Dave
Hello,
As discussed and OKed today on Toolchain release pre-talk meeting,
Infrastructure would like to request "cbuild" user access on
toolchain64 machine. It would definitely help during cbuild-lava
deployment, but having it handy is also helpful to try some
self-contained tweaks/tests. We of course going to keep other
stakeholders in loop on any changes we intend to do.
So, please add Launchpad users pfalcon, stevanr and danilo to be able
to access it.
Also, please note that during deployment of cbuild-lava, we may need
root access temporarily, but that's subject to deployment process
peculiarities and can be ondemand.
Thanks,
Paul
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linarohttp://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
Hi,
wonder how we can start landing tests in OE. Is lava-test-shell ready
for OE? What needs to happen so that we can start submitting jobs that
run scripts/binaries that we include in our OE images?
--
Alexander Sack
Director, Linaro Platform Engineering
http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
Hi all,
Just a warning that there may be a little disruption in LAVA today because I'm switching over to a wider IP address space in the lab. If all goes according to plan, there should be nothing noticeable, but just to be on the safe side I'm warning you. For the moment, all boards will be offline, but the scheduler will still be running and queuing jobs for when they come back.
Thanks
Dave
Adding Philip this time. :)
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Zen - Technical Support" <support(a)zen.co.uk>
> Subject: RE: IPv6 support [5405065:4109486]
> Date: 10 December 2012 12:17:28 GMT
> To: "Dave Pigott" <dave.pigott(a)linaro.org>
>
> Hello,
>
> The Zen core network has not yet had IPv6 turned on which would give you a native IPv6 connection as yet. Although our network could handle IPv6 Our admin systems are not yet fully compliant.
>
> You can however set up a 6in4 tunnel using a provider such as sixxs or hurricane electric which would give two-way IPv6 connectivity.
>
>
> David Flint
> Service Support Consultant
> Zen Internet
> T: 0845 058 9009
> F: 0845 058 9005
> W: http://www.zen.co.uk
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Dave Pigott" <dave.pigott(a)linaro.org>
>> Received: 10/12/2012 10:12
>> To: support(a)zen.co.uk
>> Subject: RE: IPv6 support
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just wondering if our leased line supports IPv6 or not? We would like to support both v4 and v6 if at all possible.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Dave Pigott
>
> ------------------
> Take a look inside and explore our new state of the art, award-winning Data Centre -http://www.zen.co.uk/business/default.aspx?page=11592
>
> Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this email.
>
> This message is private and confidential. If you have received this message in error please notify us and remove it from your system.
>
> Zen Internet Limited may monitor email traffic data to manage billing, to handle customer enquiries and for the prevention and detection of fraud. We may also monitor the content of emails sent to and/or from Zen Internet Limited for the purposes of security, staff training and to monitor quality of service.
>
> Zen Internet Limited is registered in England and Wales
> Sandbrook Park, Sandbrook Way, Rochdale OL11 1RY
> Company No. 03101568
> VAT Reg No. 686 0495 01
FYI
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Zen - Technical Support" <support(a)zen.co.uk>
> Subject: RE: IPv6 support [5405065:4109486]
> Date: 10 December 2012 12:17:28 GMT
> To: "Dave Pigott" <dave.pigott(a)linaro.org>
>
> Hello,
>
> The Zen core network has not yet had IPv6 turned on which would give you a native IPv6 connection as yet. Although our network could handle IPv6 Our admin systems are not yet fully compliant.
>
> You can however set up a 6in4 tunnel using a provider such as sixxs or hurricane electric which would give two-way IPv6 connectivity.
>
>
> David Flint
> Service Support Consultant
> Zen Internet
> T: 0845 058 9009
> F: 0845 058 9005
> W: http://www.zen.co.uk
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Dave Pigott" <dave.pigott(a)linaro.org>
>> Received: 10/12/2012 10:12
>> To: support(a)zen.co.uk
>> Subject: RE: IPv6 support
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just wondering if our leased line supports IPv6 or not? We would like to support both v4 and v6 if at all possible.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Dave Pigott
>
> ------------------
> Take a look inside and explore our new state of the art, award-winning Data Centre -http://www.zen.co.uk/business/default.aspx?page=11592
>
> Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this email.
>
> This message is private and confidential. If you have received this message in error please notify us and remove it from your system.
>
> Zen Internet Limited may monitor email traffic data to manage billing, to handle customer enquiries and for the prevention and detection of fraud. We may also monitor the content of emails sent to and/or from Zen Internet Limited for the purposes of security, staff training and to monitor quality of service.
>
> Zen Internet Limited is registered in England and Wales
> Sandbrook Park, Sandbrook Way, Rochdale OL11 1RY
> Company No. 03101568
> VAT Reg No. 686 0495 01
Hi all,
Just so I'm belt and braces on this, I'm working up the dhcpd.conf and dnsmasq.conf files ready for Monday. I'll send these out so that you can all peruse, approve/check my working.
Thanks
Dave
Hello everyone,
during the last month, and also during this one, the Infrastructure
team has been working on a new feature for
linaro-android-media-create.
We are introducing an "Android hardwarepack", similar to the normal
hardwarepack of linaro-media-create, with the difference that the
Android one is just a configuration file, that will store all the
board parameters (instead of having them hard-coded inside the code).
Blueprint, more details and initial code can be found here:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-image-tools/+spec/android-media-cre…
We wanted to know what kind of impact these new features might have on
your side and on LAVA.
The old linaro-android-media-create behavior will be maintained (at
least for a while), meaning that it will be possible to run l-a-m-c
without the hwpack file passed on the command line, but in the future
using hwpack will be the default approach.
On the LAVA side, do jobs need to be reconfigured or will this be
transparent for you? Any other things that might broke or change due
to the new features?
Thanks!
--
Milo Casagrande
Infrastructure Engineer
Linaro.org <www.linaro.org> │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Hello Team,
big.LITTLE MP test execution summary is:
High Lights:
* sched_tests test suite has been executed on mphackbox with latest Android
Image.
On Android:
-----------------
Total Tests = 22
Tests Passed = 16
Tests Failed = 6
Bugs have been created for failed test cases.
Pre-built images are downloaded from
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/vexpress-jb-gcc47-a…
Summary of the results can be found in attachments.
Best regards
Naresh Kamboju