Hi Basil,
I’ve not encountered this, but I’m not sure how many people use boot_linaro_kernel.
Tyler: Do you use boot_linaro_kernel on fastmodels from kernel-ci? If so, have you seen this problem?
Dave
On 7 Oct 2015, at 13:27, Basil Eljuse Basil.Eljuse@arm.com wrote:
Hello All,
Before I report this as a bug thought to check if this is a known issue or not. Do confirm.
We were trying to use lava-test-shell in running pm-qa on AEMv8 and CortexA57xA53 model variants.
Based on what we have run we could see that if we use boot_linaro_image as the image deployment mode, there are no issues, LAVA is able to run the lava-test-shell successfully.
However when we use boot_linaro_kernel as the image deployment mode, we see lava-test-shell fails due to network being reported as ‘down’.
Is this something known already? Or should I raise a bug report?
Details::
deploy_linaro_image –
Attaching the exact test def for reference.
Here we use the hwpack and a modified rootfs (added test suite in it) and then uses boot_linaro_image and provides some uefi boot commands through ‘boot_cmds’ and override some model flags using the ‘options’ parameter.
deploy_linaro_kernel –
Attaching the exact test def for reference
Here we use ‘boot_image’ with commands through boot_cmds and model flags using ‘sim_options’ parameter.
In the sim options even if we give
"-C bp.hostbridge.interfaceName=anything", "-C bp.smsc_91c111.enabled=true", "-C bp.smsc_91c111.mac_address=00:11:22:33:44:53"It don’t seem to get networking setup correctly.
We could see the initial boot successful and as part of doing the lava-test-shell execution, the pre-requisite of network being up fails!
Section 70 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_70 70.0 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_70_0 linaro-test [rc=0]# <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2015-10-06 03:26:22 PM DEBUG: send (delay_ms=0): cd /tmp 70.1 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_70_1 <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2015-10-06 03:26:22 PM DEBUG: send (delay_ms=0): Section 71 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_71 71.0 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_71_0 Section 72 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_72 72.0 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_72_0 <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2015-10-06 03:26:22 PM DEBUG: expect (600): 'linaro-test [rc=(\d+)]# ' Section 73 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_73 73.0 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_73_0 cd /tmp Section 74 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_74 74.0 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_74_0 linaro-test [rc=0]# <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2015-10-06 03:26:23 PM INFO: Waiting for network to come up 74.1 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_74_1 <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2015-10-06 03:26:23 PM DEBUG: send (delay_ms=0): LC_ALL=C ping -W4 -c1 10.1.99.203 74.2 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_74_2 <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2015-10-06 03:26:24 PM DEBUG: send (delay_ms=0): Section 75 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_75 75.0 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_75_0 Section 76 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_76 76.0 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_76_0 <LAVA_DISPATCHER>2015-10-06 03:26:24 PM DEBUG: expect (60): '['1 received|1 packets received', '0 received|0 packets received', 'Network is unreachable']' Section 77 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_77 77.0 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_77_0 LC_ALL=C ping -W4 -c1 10.1.99.203 77.1 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_77_1 PING 10.1.99.203 (10.1.99.203): 56 data bytes 77.2 http://ssg-sw.cambridge.arm.com/lava/scheduler/job/4541/log_file#L_77_2 ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
Note: Attaching only the test definitions in the email, let me know if full logs from the successful and failed runs needs to be shared, or I do that via big report if it is confirmed so.
Thanks Basil Eljuse…
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782 <job_cortex_SUCCESS.json><job_cortex_FAILURE.json>_______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org mailto:linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation