Hi,
I've just had a visit from a couple of guys from the ARM Fast Models team, and they asked an interesting question, namely would there be any interest for us of fast models of current hardware, such as Panda-es, new Samsung board etc.
Off the top of my head, I couldn't think of any, except if we say wanted to run a cluster type test where we might need several dedicated boards, but don't have sufficient real hardware. What about anyone else? Thoughts/ideas?
Thanks
Dave
Dave Pigott Validation Engineer T: +44 1223 40 00 63 | M +44 7940 45 93 44 Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012, Dave Pigott wrote:
I've just had a visit from a couple of guys from the ARM Fast Models team, and they asked an interesting question, namely would there be any interest for us of fast models of current hardware, such as Panda-es, new Samsung board etc.
Off the top of my head, I couldn't think of any, except if we say wanted to run a cluster type test where we might need several dedicated boards, but don't have sufficient real hardware. What about anyone else? Thoughts/ideas?
While not helping us directly, it might be a good way to offer Fast Models as part of DS-5 / some other SDK offer where you develop this or that app under Eclipse, then deploy it to your emulated pandaboard.
Linaro could validate its release images on these models as well; the models could help testing various hardware modes / combinations, or report some misuses (e.g. unaligned accesses or the like).
Dave Pigott dave.pigott@linaro.org writes:
I've just had a visit from a couple of guys from the ARM Fast Models team, and they asked an interesting question, namely would there be any interest for us of fast models of current hardware, such as Panda-es, new Samsung board etc.
Off the top of my head, I couldn't think of any, except if we say wanted to run a cluster type test where we might need several dedicated boards, but don't have sufficient real hardware. What about anyone else? Thoughts/ideas?
I can't really think of anything either. I guess the fast models might be more configurable than the real things, like maybe we could use a fast model that's the same as a panda but lacks wifi or something, but I can't really see what testing on an identical configuration would buy us.
Cheers, mwh
linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org