Hi John,

On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 04:56:10AM +0000, John Stultz wrote:

When I added the expected error testing, I forgot I need to set the return to zero when we successfully see an error.

Without this change we only end up testing a single heap before the test quits.

The fix looks fine - feel free to add my r-b.

However taking a new look at the tests, what do you think about conceptually replacing the 'break's with 'continue's? Is there a reason to skip all the other heaps if one of them fails a test?

Thanks, -Brian

Cc: Shuah Khan shuah@kernel.org Cc: Sumit Semwal sumit.semwal@linaro.org Cc: Benjamin Gaignard benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org Cc: Brian Starkey brian.starkey@arm.com Cc: Laura Abbott labbott@redhat.com Cc: "Andrew F. Davis" afd@ti.com Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: John Stultz john.stultz@linaro.org

---

tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c index cd5e1f602ac9..909da9cdda97 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c @@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ static int test_alloc_errors(char *heap_name) } printf("Expected error checking passed\n");

• ret = 0;

out: if (dmabuf_fd >= 0) close(dmabuf_fd); -- 2.17.1