June 2023 - Linux-kselftest-mirror

[PATCH] selftests/ftrace: Test toplevel-enable for instance

by Zheng Yejian

'available_events' is actually not required by 'test.d/event/toplevel-enable.tc' and its Existence has been tested in 'test.d/00basic/basic4.tc'. So the require of 'available_events' can be dropped and then we can add 'instance' flag to test 'test.d/event/toplevel-enable.tc' for instance. Test result show as below: # ./ftracetest test.d/event/toplevel-enable.tc === Ftrace unit tests === [1] event tracing - enable/disable with top level files [PASS] [2] (instance) event tracing - enable/disable with top level files [PASS] # of passed: 2 # of failed: 0 # of unresolved: 0 # of untested: 0 # of unsupported: 0 # of xfailed: 0 # of undefined(test bug): 0 Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1(a)huawei.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/event/toplevel-enable.tc | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/event/toplevel-enable.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/event/toplevel-enable.tc index 93c10ea42a68..8b8e1aea985b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/event/toplevel-enable.tc +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/event/toplevel-enable.tc @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ #!/bin/sh # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 # description: event tracing - enable/disable with top level files -# requires: available_events set_event events/enable +# requires: set_event events/enable +# flags: instance do_reset() { echo > set_event -- 2.25.1

2 weeks, 4 days

2
3
0 0

[PATCH] selftests/ftrace: Correctly enable event in instance-event.tc

by Zheng Yejian

Function instance_set() expects to enable event 'sched_switch', so we should set 1 to its 'enable' file. Testcase passed after this patch: # ./ftracetest test.d/instances/instance-event.tc === Ftrace unit tests === [1] Test creation and deletion of trace instances while setting an event [PASS] # of passed: 1 # of failed: 0 # of unresolved: 0 # of untested: 0 # of unsupported: 0 # of xfailed: 0 # of undefined(test bug): 0 Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1(a)huawei.com> --- .../testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/instances/instance-event.tc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/instances/instance-event.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/instances/instance-event.tc index 0eb47fbb3f44..42422e425107 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/instances/instance-event.tc +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/instances/instance-event.tc @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ instance_read() { instance_set() { while :; do - echo 1 > foo/events/sched/sched_switch + echo 1 > foo/events/sched/sched_switch/enable done 2> /dev/null } -- 2.25.1

2 weeks, 5 days

5
29
0 0

[PATCH v3 0/3] TDX Guest Quote generation support

by Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan

Hi All, In TDX guest, the attestation process is used to verify the TDX guest trustworthiness to other entities before provisioning secrets to the guest. The TDX guest attestation process consists of two steps: 1. TDREPORT generation 2. Quote generation. The First step (TDREPORT generation) involves getting the TDX guest measurement data in the format of TDREPORT which is further used to validate the authenticity of the TDX guest. The second step involves sending the TDREPORT to a Quoting Enclave (QE) server to generate a remotely verifiable Quote. TDREPORT by design can only be verified on the local platform. To support remote verification of the TDREPORT, TDX leverages Intel SGX Quoting Enclave to verify the TDREPORT locally and convert it to a remotely verifiable Quote. Although attestation software can use communication methods like TCP/IP or vsock to send the TDREPORT to QE, not all platforms support these communication models. So TDX GHCI specification [1] defines a method for Quote generation via hypercalls. Please check the discussion from Google [2] and Alibaba [3] which clarifies the need for hypercall based Quote generation support. This patch set adds this support. Support for TDREPORT generation already exists in the TDX guest driver. This patchset extends the same driver to add the Quote generation support. Following are the details of the patch set: Patch 1/3 -> Adds event notification IRQ support. Patch 2/3 -> Adds Quote generation support. Patch 3/3 -> Adds selftest support for Quote generation feature. [1] https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/726790, section titled "TDG.VP.VMCALL<GetQuote>". [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAAYXXYxxs2zy_978GJDwKfX5Hud503gPc8=1kQ-+JwG_k… [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/a69faebb-11e8-b386-d591-dbd08330b008@linux.ali… Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan (3): x86/tdx: Add TDX Guest event notify interrupt support virt: tdx-guest: Add Quote generation support selftests/tdx: Test GetQuote TDX attestation feature Documentation/virt/coco/tdx-guest.rst | 11 ++ arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c | 194 +++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h | 8 + drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/tdx-guest.c | 175 ++++++++++++++++- include/uapi/linux/tdx-guest.h | 44 +++++ tools/testing/selftests/tdx/tdx_guest_test.c | 65 ++++++- 6 files changed, 490 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1

1 month

10
38
0 0

[PATCH 0/2] v2: F_OFD_GETLK extension to read lock info

by Stas Sergeev

This extension allows to use F_UNLCK on query, which currently returns EINVAL. Instead it can be used to query the locks on a particular fd - something that is not currently possible. The basic idea is that on F_OFD_GETLK, F_UNLCK would "conflict" with (or query) any types of the lock on the same fd, and ignore any locks on other fds. Use-cases: 1. CRIU-alike scenario when you want to read the locking info from an fd for the later reconstruction. This can now be done by setting l_start and l_len to 0 to cover entire file range, and do F_OFD_GETLK. In the loop you need to advance l_start past the returned lock ranges, to eventually collect all locked ranges. 2. Implementing the lock checking/enforcing policy. Say you want to implement an "auditor" module in your program, that checks that the I/O is done only after the proper locking is applied on a file region. In this case you need to know if the particular region is locked on that fd, and if so - with what type of the lock. If you would do that currently (without this extension) then you can only check for the write locks, and for that you need to probe the lock on your fd and then open the same file via another fd and probe there. That way you can identify the write lock on a particular fd, but such trick is non-atomic and complex. As for finding out the read lock on a particular fd - impossible. This extension allows to do such queries without any extra efforts. 3. Implementing the mandatory locking policy. Suppose you want to make a policy where the write lock inhibits any unlocked readers and writers. Currently you need to check if the write lock is present on some other fd, and if it is not there - allow the I/O operation. But because the write lock can appear at any moment, you need to do that under some global lock, which can be released only when the I/O operation is finished. With the proposed extension you can instead just check the write lock on your own fd first, and if it is there - allow the I/O operation on that fd without using any global lock. Only if there is no write lock on this fd, then you need to take global lock and check for a write lock on other fds. The second patch adds a test-case for OFD locks. It tests both the generic things and the proposed extension. The third patch is a proposed man page update for fcntl(2) (not for the linux source tree) Changes in v2: - Dropped the l_pid extension patch and updated test-case accordingly. Stas Sergeev (2): fs/locks: F_UNLCK extension for F_OFD_GETLK selftests: add OFD lock tests fs/locks.c | 23 +++- tools/testing/selftests/locking/Makefile | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/locking/ofdlocks.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/locking/ofdlocks.c CC: Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)kernel.org> CC: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever(a)oracle.com> CC: Alexander Viro <viro(a)zeniv.linux.org.uk> CC: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org> CC: linux-fsdevel(a)vger.kernel.org CC: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org CC: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org> CC: linux-kselftest(a)vger.kernel.org CC: linux-api(a)vger.kernel.org -- 2.39.2

1 month, 2 weeks

6
15
0 0

[PATCH 0/4] RSEQ selftests updates

by Mathieu Desnoyers

Hi, You will find in this series updates to the rseq selftests, mainly bringing fixes from librseq project back into the RSEQ selftests. Thanks, Mathieu Mathieu Desnoyers (4): selftests/rseq: Fix CID_ID typo in Makefile selftests/rseq: Implement rseq_unqual_scalar_typeof selftests/rseq: Fix arm64 buggy load-acquire/store-release macros selftests/rseq: Use rseq_unqual_scalar_typeof in macros tools/testing/selftests/rseq/Makefile | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/rseq/compiler.h | 26 ++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-arm.h | 4 +- tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-arm64.h | 58 ++++++++++++----------- tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-mips.h | 4 +- tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-ppc.h | 4 +- tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-riscv.h | 6 +-- tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-s390.h | 4 +- tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-x86.h | 4 +- 9 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1

1 month, 2 weeks

2
8
0 0

[PATCH v2 0/7] Split a folio to any lower order folios

by Zi Yan

From: Zi Yan <ziy(a)nvidia.com> Hi all, File folio supports any order and people would like to support flexible orders for anonymous folio[1] too. Currently, split_huge_page() only splits a huge page to order-0 pages, but splitting to orders higher than 0 is also useful. This patchset adds support for splitting a huge page to any lower order pages and uses it during folio truncate operations. The patchset is on top of mm-everything-2023-03-27-21-20. Changelog from v1 === 1. Changed split_page_memcg() and split_page_owner() parameter to use order 2. Used folio_test_pmd_mappable() in place of the equivalent code Details === * Patch 1 changes split_page_memcg() to use order instead of nr_pages * Patch 2 changes split_page_owner() to use order instead of nr_pages * Patch 3 and 4 add new_order parameter split_page_memcg() and split_page_owner() and prepare for upcoming changes. * Patch 5 adds split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() to split a huge page to any lower order. The original split_huge_page_to_list() calls split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() with new_order = 0. * Patch 6 uses split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() in large pagecache folio truncation instead of split the large folio all the way down to order-0. * Patch 7 adds a test API to debugfs and test cases in split_huge_page_test selftests. Comments and/or suggestions are welcome. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Y%2FblF0GIunm+pRIC@casper.infradead.org/ Zi Yan (7): mm/memcg: use order instead of nr in split_page_memcg() mm/page_owner: use order instead of nr in split_page_owner() mm: memcg: make memcg huge page split support any order split. mm: page_owner: add support for splitting to any order in split page_owner. mm: thp: split huge page to any lower order pages. mm: truncate: split huge page cache page to a non-zero order if possible. mm: huge_memory: enable debugfs to split huge pages to any order. include/linux/huge_mm.h | 10 +- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 4 +- include/linux/page_owner.h | 10 +- mm/huge_memory.c | 137 ++++++++--- mm/memcontrol.c | 10 +- mm/page_alloc.c | 8 +- mm/page_owner.c | 10 +- mm/truncate.c | 21 +- .../selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c | 225 +++++++++++++++++- 9 files changed, 366 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-) -- 2.39.2

1 month, 2 weeks

4
13
0 0

[PATCH 0/1] Possible bug in zram on ppc64le on vfat

by Petr Vorel

Hi all, following bug is trying to workaround an error on ppc64le, where zram01.sh LTP test (there is also kernel selftest tools/testing/selftests/zram/zram01.sh, but LTP test got further updates) has often mem_used_total 0 although zram is already filled. Patch tries to repeatedly read /sys/block/zram*/mm_stat for 1 sec, waiting for mem_used_total > 0. The question if this is expected and should be workarounded or a bug which should be fixed. REPRODUCE THE ISSUE Quickest way to install only zram tests and their dependencies: make autotools && ./configure && for i in testcases/lib/ testcases/kernel/device-drivers/zram/; do cd $i && make -j$(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN) && make install && cd -; done Run the test (only on vfat) PATH="/opt/ltp/testcases/bin:$PATH" LTP_SINGLE_FS_TYPE=vfat zram01.sh Petr Vorel (1): zram01.sh: Workaround division by 0 on vfat on ppc64le .../kernel/device-drivers/zram/zram01.sh | 27 +++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.38.0

1 month, 2 weeks

5
19
0 0

[syzbot] WARNING in btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota

by syzbot

Hello, syzbot found the following issue on: HEAD commit: b7b275e60bcd Linux 6.1-rc7 git tree: upstream console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=158a7b73880000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2325e409a9a893e1 dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=adec8406ad17413d4c06 compiler: Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2 syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=169ccb75880000 C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=17bf7153880000 Downloadable assets: disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/525233126d34/disk-b7b275e6.raw… vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e8299bf41400/vmlinux-b7b275e6.… kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/eebf691dbf6f/bzImage-b7b275e6.… mounted in repro: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/5423c2d2ad62/mount_0.gz The issue was bisected to: commit c814bf958926ff45a9c1e899bd001006ab6cfbae Author: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen(a)zte.com.cn> Date: Tue Aug 16 10:51:06 2022 +0000 powerpc/selftests: Use timersub() for gettimeofday() bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=118c3d03880000 final oops: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=138c3d03880000 console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=158c3d03880000 IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: Reported-by: syzbot+adec8406ad17413d4c06(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: c814bf958926 ("powerpc/selftests: Use timersub() for gettimeofday()") RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000280 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007ffd32e91c70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000008000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000006 R13: 00007ffd32e91cb0 R14: 00007ffd32e91c90 R15: 0000000000000006 </TASK> ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3764 at fs/btrfs/space-info.h:122 btrfs_space_info_free_bytes_may_use fs/btrfs/space-info.h:154 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3764 at fs/btrfs/space-info.h:122 btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota+0x219/0x2b0 fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c:179 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 3764 Comm: syz-executor759 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc7-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 RIP: 0010:btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_may_use fs/btrfs/space-info.h:122 [inline] RIP: 0010:btrfs_space_info_free_bytes_may_use fs/btrfs/space-info.h:154 [inline] RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota+0x219/0x2b0 fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c:179 Code: 2f 00 74 08 4c 89 ef e8 b5 98 32 fe 49 8b 5d 00 48 89 df 4c 8b 74 24 08 4c 89 f6 e8 21 81 de fd 4c 39 f3 73 16 e8 d7 7e de fd <0f> 0b 31 db 4c 8b 34 24 41 80 3c 2f 00 75 8c eb 92 e8 c1 7e de fd RSP: 0018:ffffc9000443f410 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: ffffffff83ac1919 RBX: 00000000005cb000 RCX: ffff888027989d40 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000800000 RDI: 00000000005cb000 RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: ffffffff83ac190f R09: fffffbfff1cebe0e R10: fffffbfff1cebe0e R11: 1ffffffff1cebe0d R12: ffff8880774f3800 R13: ffff8880774f3860 R14: 0000000000800000 R15: 1ffff1100ee9e70c FS: 0000555555aaa300(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f0d98f20140 CR3: 0000000025ccf000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> btrfs_free_reserved_data_space+0x9d/0xd0 fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c:199 btrfs_dio_iomap_begin+0x8f7/0x1070 fs/btrfs/inode.c:7762 iomap_iter+0x606/0x8a0 fs/iomap/iter.c:74 __iomap_dio_rw+0xd91/0x20d0 fs/iomap/direct-io.c:601 btrfs_dio_write+0x9c/0xe0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8094 btrfs_direct_write fs/btrfs/file.c:1835 [inline] btrfs_do_write_iter+0x871/0x1260 fs/btrfs/file.c:1980 do_iter_write+0x6c2/0xc20 fs/read_write.c:861 vfs_writev fs/read_write.c:934 [inline] do_pwritev+0x200/0x350 fs/read_write.c:1031 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f0d98ea8ea9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 41 15 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffd32e91c38 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000148 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f0d98ea8ea9 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000280 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007ffd32e91c70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000008000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000006 R13: 00007ffd32e91cb0 R14: 00007ffd32e91c90 R15: 0000000000000006 </TASK> --- This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller(a)googlegroups.com. syzbot will keep track of this issue. See: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection syzbot can test patches for this issue, for details see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches

1 month, 3 weeks

2
2
0 0

[PATCH v3 0/2] Unify uapi bitsperlong.h

by Tiezhu Yang

v3: -- Check the definition of __BITS_PER_LONG first at the beginning of uapi/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h v2: -- Check __CHAR_BIT__ and __SIZEOF_LONG__ rather than __aarch64__, __riscv, __loongarch__, thanks Ruoyao -- Update the code comment and commit message v1: -- Rebase on 6.4-rc6 -- Only unify uapi bitsperlong.h for arm64, riscv and loongarch -- Remove uapi bitsperlong.h of hexagon and microblaze in a new patch Here is the RFC patch: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arch/1683615903-10862-1-git-send-email-yangti… Tiezhu Yang (2): asm-generic: Unify uapi bitsperlong.h for arm64, riscv and loongarch tools arch: Remove uapi bitsperlong.h of hexagon and microblaze arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h | 24 ------------------- arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h | 9 -------- arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h | 14 ----------- include/uapi/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h | 13 ++++++++++- tools/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h | 24 ------------------- tools/arch/hexagon/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h | 27 ---------------------- .../arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h | 9 -------- .../arch/microblaze/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h | 2 -- tools/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h | 14 ----------- tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h | 14 ++++++++++- tools/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h | 6 ----- 11 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h delete mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h delete mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h delete mode 100644 tools/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h delete mode 100644 tools/arch/hexagon/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h delete mode 100644 tools/arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h delete mode 100644 tools/arch/microblaze/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h delete mode 100644 tools/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h -- 2.1.0

1 month, 3 weeks

4
14
0 0

Re: [PATCH -next] selftests/landlock: Fix selftest ptrace_test run fail

by Mickaël Salaün

I checked and the Landlock ptrace test failed because Yama is enabled, which is expected. You can check that with /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope Jeff Xu sent a patch to fix this case but it is not ready yet: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220628222941.2642917-1-jeffxu@google.com Could you please send a new patch Jeff, and add Limin in Cc? On 29/11/2022 12:26, limin wrote: > cat /proc/cmdline > BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-6.1.0-next-20221116 > root=UUID=a65b3a79-dc02-4728-8a0c-5cf24f4ae08b ro > systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=1 cgroup_no_v1=all > > > config > > # > # Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT. > # Linux/x86 6.1.0-rc6 Kernel Configuration > # [...] > CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA=y [...] > CONFIG_LSM="landlock,lockdown,yama,integrity,apparmor" [...] > > On 2022/11/29 19:03, Mickaël Salaün wrote: >> I tested with next-20221116 and all tests are OK. Could you share your >> kernel configuration with a link? What is the content of /proc/cmdline? >> >> On 29/11/2022 02:42, limin wrote: >>> I run test on Linux ubuntu2204 6.1.0-next-20221116 >>> >>> I did't use yama. >>> >>> you can reproduce by this step: >>> >>> cd kernel_src >>> >>> cd tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ >>> make >>> ./ptrace_test >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2022/11/29 3:44, Mickaël Salaün wrote: >>>> This patch changes the test semantic and then cannot work on my test >>>> environment. On which kernel did you run test? Do you use Yama or >>>> something similar? >>>> >>>> On 28/11/2022 03:04, limin wrote: >>>>> Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent, >>>>> trace parent return -1 when child== 0 >>>>> How to reproduce warning: >>>>> $ make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=landlock run_tests >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: limin <limin100(a)huawei.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c | 5 ++--- >>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>>>> index c28ef98ff3ac..88c4dc63eea0 100644 >>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c >>>>> @@ -267,12 +267,11 @@ TEST_F(hierarchy, trace) >>>>> /* Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the >>>>> parent. */ >>>>> err_proc_read = test_ptrace_read(parent); >>>>> ret = ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, parent, NULL, 0); >>>>> + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); >>>>> + EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); >>>>> if (variant->domain_child) { >>>>> - EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); >>>>> - EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); >>>>> EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, err_proc_read); >>>>> } else { >>>>> - EXPECT_EQ(0, ret); >>>>> EXPECT_EQ(0, err_proc_read); >>>>> } >>>>> if (ret == 0) {

1 month, 3 weeks

2
2
0 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror June 2023