From: Xu Kuohai xukuohai@huawei.com

The two infinite loops in bound check cases added by commit 1a3148fc171f ("selftests/bpf: Check when bounds are not in the 32-bit range") increased the execution time of test_verifier from about 6 seconds to about 9 seconds. Rewrite these two infinite loops to finite loops to get rid of this extra time cost.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai xukuohai@huawei.com --- v2: - rewrite the infinite loops to finite loops instead of removing the test cases

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230327153538.850440-1-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com... --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 24 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c index 74b1917d4208..43942ce8cf15 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c @@ -784,22 +784,26 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 13),

BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0), BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0x7fffffffffffff10), BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),

+ BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_2, 0x8000000000000fff), BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0x8000000000000000), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 3), /* r1 signed range is [S64_MIN, S64_MAX] */ - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -3), + + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(),

BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "BPF program is too large", - .result = REJECT, + .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, }, { @@ -856,21 +860,25 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 6), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 10),

BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0), BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0x7fffff10), BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),

+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0x80000fff), BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0x80000000), BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_JMP32_REG(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 3), /* r1 signed range is [S32_MIN, S32_MAX] */ - BPF_JMP32_REG(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -2), + BPF_JMP32_REG(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -3), + + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(),

BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "BPF program is too large", - .result = REJECT, + .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, },