On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 9:43 PM David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 7:43 AM Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com wrote:

...

Note: this does not change the parser behavior at all (except for making one error message more useful). This is just an internal refactor.

The TAP output parser currently operates over a List[str]. This works, but we only ever need to be able to "peek" at the current line and the ability to "pop" it off.

Also, using a List means we need to wait for all the output before we can start parsing. While this is not an issue for most tests which are really lightweight, we do have some longer (~5 minutes) tests.

This patch introduces an Input wrapper class that

• Exposes a peek()/pop() interface instead of manipulating an array
  • this allows us to more easily add debugging code [1]
• Can consume an input from a generator
  • we can now parse results as tests are running (the parser code
  currently doesn't print until the end, so no impact yet).
• Tracks the current line number to print better error messages
• Would allow us to add additional features more easily, e.g. storing N previous lines so we can print out invalid lines in context, etc.

I do like this design of having a test input stream which tracks line numbers, etc. The peek()/pop() interface does match TAP reasonably nicely, too: particularly since it's line based. Thumbs up from me!

...

[1] The parsing logic is currently quite fragile. E.g. it'll often say the kernel "CRASHED" if there's something slightly wrong with the output format. When debugging a test that had some memory corruption issues, it resulted in very misleading errors from the parser.

Alas, this is very true. The plan is to do a significant rework of the parser to make it more resilient to input which doesn't exactly match what we expect (it doesn't even handle all valid TAP streams correctly).

Yeah, that's why I was very careful not to change any of the parsing itself. I just wanted to redo input-handling and not affect much else.

I did change the one error message, largely just to justify line number tracking. I found having the line # on hand is super useful for adding debug output that I wanted some excuse to keep it here.

Also, this will likely have spurious merge conflicts with Brendan's kunit_shutdown patch, but I don't think I could avoid it :|

...

Now we could easily add this to trace all the lines consumed and why def pop(self) -> str: n = self._next

•           print(f'popping {n[0]}: {n[1].ljust(40, " ")}| caller={inspect.stack()[1].function}')
  

I tried this, and it's very nice. I did need to add an "import inspect" line for the inspect.stack() function. Not sure if that's worth mentioning here.

I was too lazy to mention it, but I've added this for v2: +import inspect ... def pop(self) -> str: <etc>

...

Example output: popping 77: TAP version 14 | caller=parse_tap_header popping 78: 1..1 | caller=parse_test_plan popping 79: # Subtest: kunit_executor_test | caller=parse_subtest_header popping 80: 1..2 | caller=parse_subtest_plan popping 81: ok 1 - parse_filter_test | caller=parse_ok_not_ok_test_case popping 82: ok 2 - filter_subsuite_test | caller=parse_ok_not_ok_test_case popping 83: ok 1 - kunit_executor_test | caller=parse_ok_not_ok_test_suite

If we introduce an invalid line, we can see the parser go down the wrong path: popping 77: TAP version 14 | caller=parse_tap_header popping 78: 1..1 | caller=parse_test_plan popping 79: # Subtest: kunit_executor_test | caller=parse_subtest_header popping 80: 1..2 | caller=parse_subtest_plan popping 81: 1..2 # this is invalid! | caller=parse_ok_not_ok_test_case popping 82: ok 1 - parse_filter_test | caller=parse_ok_not_ok_test_case popping 83: ok 2 - filter_subsuite_test | caller=parse_ok_not_ok_test_case popping 84: ok 1 - kunit_executor_test | caller=parse_ok_not_ok_test_case [ERROR] ran out of lines before end token

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com

This looks good. The only issues I have are with the names "Input" and "get_input", which are a little bit confusing: comments below.

Apart from those, though, this is: Reviewed-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com

Cheers, -- David

...

tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py | 136 ++++++++++++++++--------- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 18 ++-- 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py index e8bcc139702e..65adb386364a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py @@ -47,22 +47,63 @@ class TestStatus(Enum): NO_TESTS = auto() FAILURE_TO_PARSE_TESTS = auto()

+class Input:

This class name is a little bit confusing, particularly with the description below of it being an interface around isolate_kunit_output(). While, on the whole, I agree that this is "input" from the parser's point of view, the fact that what we're parsing is kernel output makes the nomenclature here a bit messy.

Maybe name this "ParserInput" or even "TAPTestStream" (which appears to be the name used for TAP formatted results on the testanything.org page)?

Yeah, I wasn't happy with it either, particularly re "input = f(kernel_output)" I was expecting to bikeshed the names, hence the rather crude naming (class Input, get_input).

Hmm, perhaps "class InputStream" (setting aside the association with Java's base level input abstraction)? I had thought about giving it a name that mentioned TAP, but nothing this class does is specific to TAP.

...

•   """Provides a more convenient interface over isolate_kunit_output()."""
  

•   _lines: Iterator[Tuple[int, str]]
  

•   _next: Tuple[int, str]
  

•   _done: bool
  

•   def __init__(self, lines: Iterator[Tuple[int, str]]):
  

•           self._lines = lines
  

•           self._done = False
  

•           self._next = (0, '')
  

•           self._get_next()
  

•   def _get_next(self) -> None:
  

•           try:
  

•                   self._next = next(self._lines)
  

•           except StopIteration:
  

•                   self._done = True
  

•   def peek(self) -> str:
  

•           return self._next[1]
  

•   def pop(self) -> str:
  

•           n = self._next
  

•           self._get_next()
  

•           return n[1]
  

•   def __bool__(self) -> bool:
  

•           return not self._done
  

•   # Only used by kunit_tool_test.py.
  

•   def __iter__(self) -> Iterator[str]:
  

•           while bool(self):
  

•                   yield self.pop()
  

•   def line_number(self) -> int:
  

•           return self._next[0]
  

kunit_start_re = re.compile(r'TAP version [0-9]+$') kunit_end_re = re.compile('(List of all partitions:|' 'Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS:)')

-def isolate_kunit_output(kernel_output) -> Iterator[str]:

•   started = False
  

•   for line in kernel_output:
  

•           line = line.rstrip()  # line always has a trailing \n
  

•           if kunit_start_re.search(line):
  

•                   prefix_len = len(line.split('TAP version')[0])
  

•                   started = True
  

•                   yield line[prefix_len:] if prefix_len > 0 else line
  

•           elif kunit_end_re.search(line):
  

•                   break
  

•           elif started:
  

•                   yield line[prefix_len:] if prefix_len > 0 else line
  

+def get_input(kernel_output: Iterable[str]) -> Input:

Again, I think we need a clearer name for "get_input" here. "extract_tap_stream"/"get_parser_input_from_kernel_log" or something? Ideally it'd specify that we're doing the isolation/extraction of the TAP data from the kernel log, to distinguish it from parsing already isolated TAP, which is something we may wish to do.

I like "extract_tap_xxx". The use of the term "stream" matches the TAP spec, but "extract_tap_output" would be more clear to most readers, I think.

But if we go with a name like "class InputStream", then I think "extract_tap_stream" works.

...

•   def isolate_kunit_output(kernel_output: Iterable[str]) -> Iterator[Tuple[int, str]]:
  

•           line_num = 0
  

•           started = False
  

•           for line in kernel_output:
  

•                   line_num += 1
  

•                   line = line.rstrip()  # line always has a trailing \n
  

•                   if kunit_start_re.search(line):
  

•                           prefix_len = len(line.split('TAP version')[0])
  

•                           started = True
  

•                           yield line_num, line[prefix_len:]
  

•                   elif kunit_end_re.search(line):
  

•                           break
  

•                   elif started:
  

•                           yield line_num, line[prefix_len:]
  

•   return Input(lines=isolate_kunit_output(kernel_output))
  
  

def raw_output(kernel_output) -> None: for line in kernel_output: @@ -97,14 +138,14 @@ def print_log(log) -> None:

TAP_ENTRIES = re.compile(r'^(TAP|[\s]*ok|[\s]*not ok|[\s]*[0-9]+..[0-9]+|[\s]*#).*$')

-def consume_non_diagnostic(lines: List[str]) -> None:

•   while lines and not TAP_ENTRIES.match(lines[0]):
  

•           lines.pop(0)
  

+def consume_non_diagnostic(lines: Input) -> None:

•   while lines and not TAP_ENTRIES.match(lines.peek()):
  

•           lines.pop()
  
  

-def save_non_diagnostic(lines: List[str], test_case: TestCase) -> None:

•   while lines and not TAP_ENTRIES.match(lines[0]):
  

•           test_case.log.append(lines[0])
  

•           lines.pop(0)
  

+def save_non_diagnostic(lines: Input, test_case: TestCase) -> None:

•   while lines and not TAP_ENTRIES.match(lines.peek()):
  

•           test_case.log.append(lines.peek())
  

•           lines.pop()
  
  

OkNotOkResult = namedtuple('OkNotOkResult', ['is_ok','description', 'text'])

@@ -112,18 +153,18 @@ OK_NOT_OK_SUBTEST = re.compile(r'^[\s]+(ok|not ok) [0-9]+ - (.*)$')

OK_NOT_OK_MODULE = re.compile(r'^(ok|not ok) ([0-9]+) - (.*)$')

-def parse_ok_not_ok_test_case(lines: List[str], test_case: TestCase) -> bool: +def parse_ok_not_ok_test_case(lines: Input, test_case: TestCase) -> bool: save_non_diagnostic(lines, test_case) if not lines: test_case.status = TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED return True

•   line = lines[0]
  

•   line = lines.peek()
    match = OK_NOT_OK_SUBTEST.match(line)
    while not match and lines:
  

•           line = lines.pop(0)
  

•           line = lines.pop()
            match = OK_NOT_OK_SUBTEST.match(line)
    if match:
  

•           test_case.log.append(lines.pop(0))
  

•           test_case.log.append(lines.pop())
            test_case.name = match.group(2)
            if test_case.status == TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED:
                    return True
  

@@ -138,14 +179,14 @@ def parse_ok_not_ok_test_case(lines: List[str], test_case: TestCase) -> bool: SUBTEST_DIAGNOSTIC = re.compile(r'^[\s]+# (.*)$') DIAGNOSTIC_CRASH_MESSAGE = re.compile(r'^[\s]+# .*?: kunit test case crashed!$')

-def parse_diagnostic(lines: List[str], test_case: TestCase) -> bool: +def parse_diagnostic(lines: Input, test_case: TestCase) -> bool: save_non_diagnostic(lines, test_case) if not lines: return False

•   line = lines[0]
  

•   line = lines.peek()
    match = SUBTEST_DIAGNOSTIC.match(line)
    if match:
  

•           test_case.log.append(lines.pop(0))
  

•           test_case.log.append(lines.pop())
            crash_match = DIAGNOSTIC_CRASH_MESSAGE.match(line)
            if crash_match:
                    test_case.status = TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED
  

@@ -153,7 +194,7 @@ def parse_diagnostic(lines: List[str], test_case: TestCase) -> bool: else: return False

-def parse_test_case(lines: List[str]) -> Optional[TestCase]: +def parse_test_case(lines: Input) -> Optional[TestCase]: test_case = TestCase() save_non_diagnostic(lines, test_case) while parse_diagnostic(lines, test_case): @@ -165,24 +206,24 @@ def parse_test_case(lines: List[str]) -> Optional[TestCase]:

SUBTEST_HEADER = re.compile(r'^[\s]+# Subtest: (.*)$')

-def parse_subtest_header(lines: List[str]) -> Optional[str]: +def parse_subtest_header(lines: Input) -> Optional[str]: consume_non_diagnostic(lines) if not lines: return None

•   match = SUBTEST_HEADER.match(lines[0])
  

•   match = SUBTEST_HEADER.match(lines.peek())
    if match:
  

•           lines.pop(0)
  

•           lines.pop()
            return match.group(1)
    else:
            return None
  
  

SUBTEST_PLAN = re.compile(r'[\s]+[0-9]+..([0-9]+)')

-def parse_subtest_plan(lines: List[str]) -> Optional[int]: +def parse_subtest_plan(lines: Input) -> Optional[int]: consume_non_diagnostic(lines)

•   match = SUBTEST_PLAN.match(lines[0])
  

•   match = SUBTEST_PLAN.match(lines.peek())
    if match:
  

•           lines.pop(0)
  

•           lines.pop()
            return int(match.group(1))
    else:
            return None
  

@@ -199,17 +240,17 @@ def max_status(left: TestStatus, right: TestStatus) -> TestStatus: else: return TestStatus.SUCCESS

-def parse_ok_not_ok_test_suite(lines: List[str], +def parse_ok_not_ok_test_suite(lines: Input, test_suite: TestSuite, expected_suite_index: int) -> bool: consume_non_diagnostic(lines) if not lines: test_suite.status = TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED return False

•   line = lines[0]
  

•   line = lines.peek()
    match = OK_NOT_OK_MODULE.match(line)
    if match:
  

•           lines.pop(0)
  

•           lines.pop()
            if match.group(1) == 'ok':
                    test_suite.status = TestStatus.SUCCESS
            else:
  

@@ -231,7 +272,7 @@ def bubble_up_test_case_errors(test_suite: TestSuite) -> TestStatus: max_test_case_status = bubble_up_errors(x.status for x in test_suite.cases) return max_status(max_test_case_status, test_suite.status)

-def parse_test_suite(lines: List[str], expected_suite_index: int) -> Optional[TestSuite]: +def parse_test_suite(lines: Input, expected_suite_index: int) -> Optional[TestSuite]: if not lines: return None consume_non_diagnostic(lines) @@ -257,26 +298,26 @@ def parse_test_suite(lines: List[str], expected_suite_index: int) -> Optional[Te print_with_timestamp(red('[ERROR] ') + 'ran out of lines before end token') return test_suite else:

•           print('failed to parse end of suite' + lines[0])
  

•           print(f'failed to parse end of suite "{name}", at line {lines.line_number()}: {lines.peek()}')
            return None
  
  

TAP_HEADER = re.compile(r'^TAP version 14$')

-def parse_tap_header(lines: List[str]) -> bool: +def parse_tap_header(lines: Input) -> bool: consume_non_diagnostic(lines)

•   if TAP_HEADER.match(lines[0]):
  

•           lines.pop(0)
  

•   if TAP_HEADER.match(lines.peek()):
  

•           lines.pop()
            return True
    else:
            return False
  
  

TEST_PLAN = re.compile(r'[0-9]+..([0-9]+)')

-def parse_test_plan(lines: List[str]) -> Optional[int]: +def parse_test_plan(lines: Input) -> Optional[int]: consume_non_diagnostic(lines)

•   match = TEST_PLAN.match(lines[0])
  

•   match = TEST_PLAN.match(lines.peek())
    if match:
  

•           lines.pop(0)
  

•           lines.pop()
            return int(match.group(1))
    else:
            return None
  

@@ -284,7 +325,7 @@ def parse_test_plan(lines: List[str]) -> Optional[int]: def bubble_up_suite_errors(test_suites: Iterable[TestSuite]) -> TestStatus: return bubble_up_errors(x.status for x in test_suites)

-def parse_test_result(lines: List[str]) -> TestResult: +def parse_test_result(lines: Input) -> TestResult: consume_non_diagnostic(lines) if not lines or not parse_tap_header(lines): return TestResult(TestStatus.NO_TESTS, [], lines) @@ -338,11 +379,12 @@ def print_and_count_results(test_result: TestResult) -> Tuple[int, int, int]: print_with_timestamp('') return total_tests, failed_tests, crashed_tests

-def parse_run_tests(kernel_output) -> TestResult: +def parse_run_tests(kernel_output: Iterable[str]) -> TestResult: total_tests = 0 failed_tests = 0 crashed_tests = 0

•   test_result = parse_test_result(list(isolate_kunit_output(kernel_output)))
  

•   lines = get_input(kernel_output)
  

•   test_result = parse_test_result(lines)
    if test_result.status == TestStatus.NO_TESTS:
            print(red('[ERROR] ') + yellow('no tests run!'))
    elif test_result.status == TestStatus.FAILURE_TO_PARSE_TESTS:
  

diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py index 2e809dd956a7..e82678a25bef 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ from unittest import mock

import tempfile, shutil # Handling test_tmpdir

+import itertools import json import signal import os @@ -92,17 +93,18 @@ class KconfigTest(unittest.TestCase):

class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):

•   def assertContains(self, needle, haystack):
  

•           for line in haystack:
  

•   def assertContains(self, needle: str, haystack: kunit_parser.Input):
  

•           # Clone the iterator so we can print the contents on failure.
  

•           copy, backup = itertools.tee(haystack)
  

•           for line in copy:
                    if needle in line:
                            return
  

•           raise AssertionError('"' +
  

•                   str(needle) + '" not found in "' + str(haystack) + '"!')
  

•           raise AssertionError(f'"{needle}" not found in {list(backup)}!')
  
    def test_output_isolated_correctly(self):
            log_path = test_data_path('test_output_isolated_correctly.log')
            with open(log_path) as file:
  

•                   result = kunit_parser.isolate_kunit_output(file.readlines())
  

•                   result = kunit_parser.get_input(file.readlines())
            self.assertContains('TAP version 14', result)
            self.assertContains('   # Subtest: example', result)
            self.assertContains('   1..2', result)
  

@@ -113,7 +115,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_output_with_prefix_isolated_correctly(self): log_path = test_data_path('test_pound_sign.log') with open(log_path) as file:

•                   result = kunit_parser.isolate_kunit_output(file.readlines())
  

•                   result = kunit_parser.get_input(file.readlines())
            self.assertContains('TAP version 14', result)
            self.assertContains('   # Subtest: kunit-resource-test', result)
            self.assertContains('   1..5', result)
  

@@ -159,7 +161,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): empty_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run.log') with open(empty_log) as file: result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(

•                           kunit_parser.isolate_kunit_output(file.readlines()))
  

•                           kunit_parser.get_input(file.readlines()))
            self.assertEqual(0, len(result.suites))
            self.assertEqual(
                    kunit_parser.TestStatus.NO_TESTS,
  

@@ -170,7 +172,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): print_mock = mock.patch('builtins.print').start() with open(crash_log) as file: result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(

•                           kunit_parser.isolate_kunit_output(file.readlines()))
  

•                           kunit_parser.get_input(file.readlines()))
            print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('no tests run!'))
            print_mock.stop()
            file.close()
  
  

base-commit: c3d0e3fd41b7f0f5d5d5b6022ab7e813f04ea727

2.31.1.818.g46aad6cb9e-goog