From: Rae Moar rmoar@google.com

Document the kernel-specific variant of the Test Anything Protocol (TAP)[1] used by the kernel and kernel test frameworks. This version is called KTAP, and this version of the specification should describe how results produced by kselftest and KUnit (with some trivial changes to bring the two into alignment).

It does not make any significant additions or changes other than those already in use in the kernel: additional features can be added as they become necessary and used.

See prior discussion in the following RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CA+GJov6tdjvY9x12JsJT14qn6c7NViJxqaJ....

[1]: https://testanything.org/tap-version-13-specification.html

Signed-off-by: Rae Moar rmoar@google.com Co-developed-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com ---

Hi all,

This is a version of the KTAP RFC from [1], with a greater focus on being compatible with what's currently used, rather than prescribing a new format. The format here should be a superset of what KUnit and kselftest output, with a couple of notable exceptions: - KUnit currently uses the TAP14-style "Subtest" header instead of nested TAP version headers. This will be fixed in KUnit once this goes in. - The (unused) XPASS option is not mentioned (it'll devolve into a harmless comment)

Cheers, -- David

[1]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CA+GJov6tdjvY9x12JsJT14qn6c7NViJxqaJ...

--- Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst | 287 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 288 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst index 010a2af1e7d9..4621eac290f4 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst kgdb kselftest kunit/index + ktap

.. only:: subproject and html diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7c17956b998a --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst @@ -0,0 +1,287 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +======================================== +The Kernel Test Anything Protocol (KTAP) +======================================== + +TAP, or the Test Anything Protocol is a format for specifying test results used +by a number of projects. It's website and specification are found at this `link +https://testanything.org/`_. The Linux Kernel largely uses TAP output for test +results. However, Kernel testing frameworks have special needs for test results +which don't align with the original TAP specification. Thus, a "Kernel TAP" +(KTAP) format is specified to extend and alter TAP to support these use-cases. +This specification describes the generally accepted format of KTAP as it is +currently used in the kernel + +KTAP test results describe a series of tests (which may be nested: i.e., test +can have subtests), each of which can contain both diagnostic data -- e.g., log +lines -- and a final result. The test structure and results are +machine-readable, whereas the diagnostic data is unstructured and is there to +aid human debugging. + +KTAP output is built from four different types of lines: +- Version lines +- Plan lines +- Test case result lines +- Diagnostic lines + +Note that, in particular, nested test results work differently in KTAP from +the proposed TAP14 specification: +https://github.com/TestAnything/Specification/blob/tap-14-specification/spec... + +Version lines +------------- + +All KTAP-formatted results begin with a "version line" which specifies which +version of the (K)TAP standard the result is compliant with. + +For example: +- "KTAP version 1" +- "TAP version 13" +- "TAP version 14" + +Note that, in KTAP, subtests also begin with a version line, which denotes the +start of the nested test results. This differs from TAP14, which uses a +separate "Subtest" line. + +While, going forward, "KTAP version 1" should be used by compliant tests, it +is expected that most parsers and other tooling will accept the other versions +listed here for compatibility with existing tests and frameworks. + +Plan lines +---------- + +A test plan provides the number of tests (or subtests) in the KTAP ouput. + +Plan lines must follow the format of "1..N" where N is the number of tests or subtests. +Plan lines follow version lines to indicate the number of nested tests. + +While there are cases where the number of tests is not known in advance -- in +which case the test plan may be omitted -- it is strongly recommended one is +present where possible. + +Test case result lines +---------------------- + +Test case result lines indicate the final status of a test. +They are required and must have the format: + +.. code-block:: + + <result> <number> [<description>][ # [<directive>] [<diagnostic data>]] + +The result can be either "ok", which indicates the test case passed, +or "not ok", which indicates that the test case failed. + +<number> represents the number of the test being performed. The first test must +have the number 1 and the number then must increase by 1 for each additional +subtest within the same test at the same nesting level. + +The description is a description of the test, generally the name of +the test, and can be any string of words (can't include #). The +description is optional, but recommended. + +The directive and any diagnostic data is optional. If either are present, they +must follow a hash sign, "#". + +A directive is a keyword that indicates a different outcome for a test other +than passed and failed. The directive is optional, and consists of a single +keyword preceding the diagnostic data. In the event that a parser encounters +a directive it doesn't support, it should fall back to the "ok" / "not ok" +result. + +Currently accepted directives are: + +- "SKIP", which indicates a test was skipped (note the result of the test case + result line can be either "ok" or "not ok" if the SKIP directive is used) +- "TODO", which indicates that a test is not expected to pass at the moment, + e.g. because the feature it is testing is known to be broken. While this + directive is inherited from TAP, its use in the kernel is discouraged. +- "XFAIL", which indicates that a test is expected to fail. This is similar + to "TODO", above, and is used by some kselftest tests. +- "XPASS", which indicated that a test is expected to pass. There is some code + which tracks this result, but it does not appear to currently be used. +- “TIMEOUT”, which indicates a test has timed out (note the result of the test + case result line should be “not ok” if the TIMEOUT directive is used) +- “ERROR”, which indicates a test has failed with a specific error that is + included in the diagnostic data (note the result of the test case result like + should be “not ok” if the ERROR directive is used) + +The diagnostic data is a plain-text field which contains any additional details +about why this result was produced. This is typically an error code for ERROR +or failed tests, or a description of missing dependencies for a SKIP result. + +The diagnostic data field is optional, and results which have neither a +directive nor any diagnostic data do not need to include the "#" field +separator. + +Example result lines include: + +.. code-block:: + + ok 1 test_case_name + +The test "test_case_name" passed. + +.. code-block:: + + not ok 1 test_case_name + +The test "test_case_name" failed. + +.. code-block:: + + ok 1 test # SKIP necessary dependency unavailable + +The test "test" was SKIPPED with the diagnostic message "necessary dependency +unavailable". + +.. code-block:: + + not ok 1 test # TIMEOUT 30 seconds + +The test "test" timed out, with diagnostic data "30 seconds". + +.. code-block:: + + ok 5 check return code # rcode=0 + +The test "check return code" passed, with additional diagnostic data is +“rcode=0” + + +Diagnostic lines +---------------- + +If tests wish to output any further information, they should do so using +"diagnostic lines". Diagnostic lines are optional, freeform text, and are +often used to describe what is being tested and any intermediate results in +more detail than the final result and diagnostic data line provides. + +Diagnostic lines are formatted as "# <diagnostic_description>", where the +description can be any string. Diagnostic lines can be anywhere in the test +output. As a rule, diagnostic lines regarding a test are directly before the +test result line for that test. + +Note that most tools will treat unknown lines (see below) as diagnostic lines, +even if they do not start with a "#": this is to capture any other useful +kernel output which may help debug the test. It is nevertheless recommended +that tests always prefix any diagnostic output they have with a "#" character. + +Unknown lines +------------- + +There may be lines within KTAP output that do not follow the format of one of +the four formats for lines described above. This is allowed, however, they will +not influence the status of the tests. + +Nested tests +------------ + +In KTAP, tests can be nested. This is done by having a test include within its +output an entire set of KTAP-formatted results. This can be used to categorize +and group related tests, or to split out different results from the same test. + +The "parent" test's result should consist of all of its subtests' results, +starting with another KTAP version line and test plan, and end with the overall +result. If one of the subtests fail, for example, the parent test should also +fail. + +Additionally, all result lines in a subtest should be indented. One level of +indentation is two spaces: " ". The indentation should begin at the version +line and should end before the parent test's result line. + +An example of a test with two nested subtests: + +.. code-block:: + + KTAP version 1 + 1..1 + KTAP version 1 + 1..2 + ok 1 test_1 + not ok 2 test_2 + # example failed + not ok 1 example + +An example format with multiple levels of nested testing: + +.. code-block:: + + KTAP version 1 + 1..2 + KTAP version 1 + 1..2 + KTAP version 1 + 1..2 + not ok 1 test_1 + ok 2 test_2 + not ok 1 test_3 + ok 2 test_4 # SKIP + not ok 1 example_test_1 + ok 2 example_test_2 + + +Major differences between TAP and KTAP +-------------------------------------- + +Note the major differences between the TAP and KTAP specification: +- yaml and json are not recommended in diagnostic messages +- TODO directive not recognized +- KTAP allows for an arbitrary number of tests to be nested + +The TAP14 specification does permit nested tests, but instead of using another +nested version line, uses a line of the form +"Subtest: <name>" where <name> is the name of the parent test. + +Example KTAP output +-------------------- +.. code-block:: + + KTAP version 1 + 1..1 + KTAP version 1 + 1..3 + KTAP version 1 + 1..1 + # test_1: initializing test_1 + ok 1 test_1 + ok 1 example_test_1 + KTAP version 1 + 1..2 + ok 1 test_1 # SKIP test_1 skipped + ok 2 test_2 + ok 2 example_test_2 + KTAP version 1 + 1..3 + ok 1 test_1 + # test_2: FAIL + not ok 2 test_2 + ok 3 test_3 # SKIP test_3 skipped + not ok 3 example_test_3 + not ok 1 main_test + +This output defines the following hierarchy: + +A single test called "main_test", which fails, and has three subtests: +- "example_test_1", which passes, and has one subtest: + + - "test_1", which passes, and outputs the dianostic message "test_1: initializing test_1" + +- "example_test_2", which passes, and has two subtests: + + - "test_1", which is skipped, with the explanation "test_1 skipped" + - "test_2", which passes + +- "example_test_3", which fails, and has three subtests + + - "test_1", which passes + - "test_2", which outputs the diagnostic line "test_2: FAIL", and fails. + - "test_3", which is skipped with the explanation "test_3 skipped" + +Note that the individual subtests with the same names do not conflict, as they +are found in different parent tests. This output also exhibits some sensible +rules for "bubbling up" test results: a test fails if any of its subtests fail. +Skipped tests do not affect the result of the parent test (though it often +makes sense for a test to be marked skipped if _all_ of its subtests have been +skipped).