Thanks for the patches, please include akpm@linux-foundation.org in the future, as we can merge the changes through Andrew as well.

Also please Cc yzaikin@google.com, brendanhiggins@google.com in follow ups for now. They are looking at the sysctl testing code as well.

Some feedback below:

In-Reply-To: 20181227111231.12912-2-zev@bewilderbeest.net

On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 05:12:29AM -0600, Zev Weiss wrote:

+run_wideint_tests() +{

• # check negative and positive 64-bit values, with and without
• # bits set in the lower 31, and with and without bit 31 (sign
• # bit of a 32-bit int) set. None of these are representable
• # in 32 bits, and hence all should fail.
• check_failure 0x0000010000000000
• check_failure 0x0000010080000000
• check_failure 0x000001ff7fffffff
• check_failure 0x000001ffffffffff
• check_failure 0xffffffff7fffffff

• check_failure 0xffffffffffffffff

This s64 version of -1

• check_failure 0xffffff0000000000
• check_failure 0xffffff0080000000

+}

It was still unclear from the comments and manually looking at the values why they are clear candidates to always test from all respective 64-bit values. A comment per each would be useful.

Luis