On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 20:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.88 release. There are 99 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:30:09 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.88-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.88-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: 22ecdc9ddc3f790d7897c1c8bc1813fba064ec9c * git describe: v5.10.87-100-g22ecdc9ddc3f * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## No Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.84-128-g24961377099e)
## No Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.84-128-g24961377099e)
## Test result summary total: 92504, pass: 79026, fail: 519, skip: 12006, xfail: 953
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 259 total, 255 passed, 4 failed * arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 34 total, 30 passed, 4 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 52 total, 46 passed, 6 failed * riscv: 24 total, 16 passed, 8 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org