Hello!
We didn't get the notification for this release candidate. Thanks for the heads up, Guenter!
On 1/25/22 10:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.3 release. There are 1033 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:52:30 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.3-rc2.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro's test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
## Build * kernel: 5.16.3-rc2 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.16.y * git commit: 39cb7e05eaf4fd55c6445fe8fe9ffa7f8d329205 * git describe: v5.16.2-1034-g39cb7e05eaf4 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.16.y/build/v5.16....
## No test Regressions (compared to v5.16.2)
## No metric Regressions (compared to v5.16.2)
## No test Fixes (compared to v5.16.2)
## No metric Fixes (compared to v5.16.2)
## Test result summary total: 105828, pass: 89914, fail: 1186, skip: 13585, xfail: 1143
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 263 total, 261 passed, 2 failed * arm64: 42 total, 42 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 40 total, 37 passed, 3 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 37 total, 35 passed, 2 failed * parisc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 56 total, 50 passed, 6 failed * riscv: 28 total, 24 passed, 4 failed * s390: 22 total, 20 passed, 2 failed * sh: 26 total, 24 passed, 2 failed * sparc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 42 total, 42 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-lockt[ * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
Greetings!
Daniel Díaz daniel.diaz@linaro.org