This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.9 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.9-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.16.9-rc1
Herbert Xu herbert@gondor.apana.org.au crypto: api - Move cryptomgr soft dependency into algapi
Namjae Jeon linkinjeon@kernel.org ksmbd: fix SMB 3.11 posix extension mount failure
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch scgl@linux.ibm.com KVM: s390: Return error on SIDA memop on normal guest
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path
Damien Le Moal damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com ata: libata-core: Fix ata_dev_config_cpr()
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++-- arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 ++ crypto/algapi.c | 1 + crypto/api.c | 1 - drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 14 ++++++-------- drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +- fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c | 2 +- include/linux/ata.h | 2 +- 8 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 20:14:32 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.9 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.9-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
5.16.9-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen foxhlchen@gmail.com
On 2/9/22 12:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.9 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.9-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 20:14:32 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.9 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.9-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.16: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 122 tests: 122 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.16.9-rc1-gddf6ceb4eefb Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 00:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.9 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.9-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.16.9-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.16.y * git commit: ddf6ceb4eefb5985395eb6f289c2e63a46347273 * git describe: v5.16.7-134-gddf6ceb4eefb * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.16.y/build/v5.16....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.16.7-128-g87d888a197db) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.16.7-128-g87d888a197db) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.16.7-128-g87d888a197db) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.16.7-128-g87d888a197db) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 86799, pass: 74577, fail: 996, skip: 10427, xfail: 799
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed * i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed * mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 52 total, 39 passed, 13 failed * riscv: 24 total, 20 passed, 4 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * perf/Adding-1767d32e5a104d4d13d92babc85766d7-/tmp * perf/Adding-3e9fe97d46b1851c50367e44548ebdcee7d00326-/tmp * perf/Adding-8ff8eea75ef21d923271fda79d1afa39-/tmp * perf/Adding-b39fb903844ca894205c5dc1a6402f77b152cfcb-/tmp * perf/Adding-b49b8dec00f9591b476d003a6e367381-/tmp * perf/Adding-c685cd66359fb80ad483b9c8e211a10b776cef29-/tmp * perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On 2/9/22 11:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.9 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.9-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on x86-64/Cezanne: No regressions during Clang or GCC builds, in dmesg or during a dozen s0ix suspend cycles.
Tested-by: Scott Bruce smbruce@gmail.com
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 1:05 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.9 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.9-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
hello ,
Compiled and booted 5.16.9-rc1+ on VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR. NO regressions from dmesg.
On 2/9/22 11:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.9 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.9-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos re@w6rz.net
On 2/9/2022 11:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.9 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.9-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:32PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.9 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 488 pass: 488 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, at 2:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.9 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Compiled and booted 5.16.9-rc1 on my x86_64 test system successfully without errors or regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins slade@sladewatkins.com
Thanks, Slade
On 10/02/22 02.14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.9 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, gcc 10.2.0) and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, gcc 11.2.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya bagasdotme@gmail.com
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:32PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.9 release. There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg,
5.16.9-rc1 tested.
Run tested on: - Allwinner H6 (Tanix TX6) - Intel Tiger Lake x86_64 (nuc11 i7-1165G7)
In addition - build tested on: - Allwinner A64 - Allwinner H3 - Allwinner H5 - NXP iMX6 - NXP iMX8 - Qualcomm Dragonboard - Rockchip RK3288 - Rockchip RK3328 - Rockchip RK3399pro - Samsung Exynos
Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum rudi@heitbaum.com -- Rudi
-
Bagas Sanjaya -
Florian Fainelli -
Fox Chen -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jeffrin Thalakkottoor -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Ron Economos -
Rudi Heitbaum -
Scott Bruce -
Shuah Khan -
Slade Watkins