This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.1 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.1-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.19.1-rc1
Pawan Gupta pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com x86/speculation: Add LFENCE to RSB fill sequence
Daniel Sneddon daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com x86/speculation: Add RSB VM Exit protections
Ning Qiang sohu0106@126.com macintosh/adb: fix oob read in do_adb_query() function
Hilda Wu hildawu@realtek.com Bluetooth: btusb: Add Realtek RTL8852C support ID 0x13D3:0x3586
Hilda Wu hildawu@realtek.com Bluetooth: btusb: Add Realtek RTL8852C support ID 0x13D3:0x3587
Hilda Wu hildawu@realtek.com Bluetooth: btusb: Add Realtek RTL8852C support ID 0x0CB8:0xC558
Hilda Wu hildawu@realtek.com Bluetooth: btusb: Add Realtek RTL8852C support ID 0x04C5:0x1675
Hilda Wu hildawu@realtek.com Bluetooth: btusb: Add Realtek RTL8852C support ID 0x04CA:0x4007
Aaron Ma aaron.ma@canonical.com Bluetooth: btusb: Add support of IMC Networks PID 0x3568
Ahmad Fatoum a.fatoum@pengutronix.de dt-bindings: bluetooth: broadcom: Add BCM4349B1 DT binding
Hakan Jansson hakan.jansson@infineon.com Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Add DT compatible for CYW55572
Ahmad Fatoum a.fatoum@pengutronix.de Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Add BCM4349B1 variant
Sai Teja Aluvala quic_saluvala@quicinc.com Bluetooth: hci_qca: Return wakeup for qca_wakeup
Peter Collingbourne pcc@google.com arm64: set UXN on swapper page tables
Andrew Lunn andrew@lunn.ch ata: sata_mv: Fixes expected number of resources now IRQs are gone
GUO Zihua guozihua@huawei.com crypto: arm64/poly1305 - fix a read out-of-bound
Tony Luck tony.luck@intel.com ACPI: APEI: Better fix to avoid spamming the console with old error logs
Werner Sembach wse@tuxedocomputers.com ACPI: video: Shortening quirk list by identifying Clevo by board_name only
Werner Sembach wse@tuxedocomputers.com ACPI: video: Force backlight native for some TongFang devices
Stéphane Graber stgraber@ubuntu.com tools/vm/slabinfo: Handle files in debugfs
Jan Kara jack@suse.cz block: fix default IO priority handling again
-------------
Diffstat:
Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/spectre.rst | 8 ++ .../bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.yaml | 1 + Makefile | 4 +- arch/arm64/crypto/poly1305-glue.c | 2 +- arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h | 4 +- arch/arm64/kernel/head.S | 2 +- arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 2 + arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 4 + arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 21 +++++- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++------ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 12 ++- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S | 8 +- block/blk-ioc.c | 2 + block/ioprio.c | 4 +- drivers/acpi/apei/bert.c | 31 ++++++-- drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 55 +++++++++----- drivers/ata/sata_mv.c | 2 +- drivers/bluetooth/btbcm.c | 2 + drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 15 ++++ drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c | 2 + drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 2 +- drivers/macintosh/adb.c | 2 +- include/linux/ioprio.h | 2 +- tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 + tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 4 + tools/vm/slabinfo.c | 26 ++++++- 26 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
On 8/9/22 11:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.1 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.1-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels and build tested with BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 12:58 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.1 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.1-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hi Greg,
Compiled and booted on my test system Lenovo P50s: Intel Core i7 No emergency and critical messages in the dmesg
./perf bench sched all # Running sched/messaging benchmark... # 20 sender and receiver processes per group # 10 groups == 400 processes run
Total time: 0.865 [sec]
# Running sched/pipe benchmark... # Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes
Total time: 10.206 [sec]
10.206371 usecs/op 97978 ops/sec
Tested-by: Zan Aziz zanaziz313@gmail.com
Thanks -Zan
On 8/9/22 12:00 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.1 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.1-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On 8/9/22 11:00 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.1 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.1-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos re@w6rz.net
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 23:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.1 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.1-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro's test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.19.1-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.19.y * git commit: 8054ca35012635b5d3f63311bd312e7149d80b38 * git describe: v5.19-22-g8054ca350126 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.19.y/build/v5.19-...
## No test regressions (compared to v5.19.0)
## No metric regressions (compared to v5.19.0)
## No test fixes (compared to v5.19.0)
## No metric fixes (compared to v5.19.0)
## Test result summary total: 134782, pass: 120620, fail: 1758, skip: 12404, xfail: 0
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 301 total, 301 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 62 total, 60 passed, 2 failed * i386: 52 total, 50 passed, 2 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 60 total, 54 passed, 6 failed * riscv: 27 total, 22 passed, 5 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 55 total, 53 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance * vdso
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 08:00:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.1 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 10.2.0) and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya bagasdotme@gmail.com
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 08:00:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.1 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 150 pass: 150 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 480 pass: 480 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 08:00:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.1 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.1-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes jforbes@fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 08:00:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.1 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg,
5.19.1-rc1 tested.
Run tested on: - Allwinner H6 (Tanix TX6) - Intel Tiger Lake x86_64 (nuc11 i7-1165G7)
In addition - build tested for: - Allwinner A64 - Allwinner H3 - Allwinner H5 - NXP iMX6 - NXP iMX8 - Qualcomm Dragonboard - Rockchip RK3288 - Rockchip RK3328 - Rockchip RK3399pro - Samsung Exynos
Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum rudi@heitbaum.com -- Rudi