This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.194 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.194-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.194-rc1
Paul E. McKenney paulmck@kernel.org rcu-tasks: Add trc_inspect_reader() checks for exiting critical section
Paul E. McKenney paulmck@kernel.org rcu-tasks: Wait for trc_read_check_handler() IPIs
Neeraj Upadhyay neeraju@codeaurora.org rcu-tasks: Fix IPI failure handling in trc_wait_for_one_reader
Paul E. McKenney paulmck@kernel.org rcu: Prevent expedited GP from enabling tick on offline CPU
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Revert "MIPS: Alchemy: fix dbdma2"
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Revert "drm/amdgpu: install stub fence into potential unused fence pointers"
Loic Poulain loic.poulain@linaro.org mhi: pci_generic: Fix implicit conversion warning
James Morse james.morse@arm.com ARM: module: Use module_init_layout_section() to spot init sections
James Morse james.morse@arm.com arm64: module: Use module_init_layout_section() to spot init sections
Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de arm64: module-plts: inline linux/moduleloader.h
James Morse james.morse@arm.com module: Expose module_init_layout_section()
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++-- arch/arm/kernel/module-plts.c | 2 +- arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c | 3 ++- arch/mips/alchemy/common/dbdma.c | 27 ++++++++++++------------- drivers/bus/mhi/host/pci_generic.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 6 ++---- include/linux/moduleloader.h | 5 +++++ kernel/module.c | 2 +- kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 5 ++++- 10 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
On 8/31/23 04:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.194 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.194-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli florian.fainelli@broadcom.com
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 01:09:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.194 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.4.1 20230829): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4881 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4902
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 16:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.194 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.194-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.194-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: e25611a229ff9e907889923c2702d817003bc228 * git describe: v5.10.193-12-ge25611a229ff * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.193)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.193)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.193)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.193)
## Test result summary total: 97983, pass: 79078, fail: 2772, skip: 16068, xfail: 65
## Build Summary * arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed * arm: 112 total, 112 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 43 total, 43 passed, 0 failed * i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed * mips: 27 total, 26 passed, 1 failed * parisc: 4 total, 0 passed, 4 failed * powerpc: 25 total, 24 passed, 1 failed * riscv: 12 total, 11 passed, 1 failed * s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed * sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * boot * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-exec * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs * kselftest-filesystems-epoll * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-ftrace * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-net-forwarding * kselftest-net-mptcp * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-user_events * kselftest-vDSO * kselftest-vm * kselftest-watchdog * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On 8/31/23 05:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.194 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.194-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 13:09:52 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.194 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.194-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 11 builds: 11 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.194-rc1-ge25611a229ff Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 01:09:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.194 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 487 pass: 487 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 16:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.194 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Sep 2023 11:08:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.194-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.195-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: 95379666b7a68327e8f4c3a0dbf28ae0c479ab4c * git describe: v5.10.194-407-g95379666b7a6 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.194)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.194)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.194)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.194)
## Test result summary total: 80823, pass: 63120, fail: 2111, skip: 15541, xfail: 51
## Build Summary * arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed * arm: 111 total, 111 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed * i386: 28 total, 28 passed, 0 failed * mips: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed * powerpc: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed * s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * sh: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 33 total, 33 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * boot * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-exec * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs * kselftest-filesystems-epoll * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-ftrace * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-net-forwarding * kselftest-net-mptcp * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-user_events * kselftest-vDSO * kselftest-vm * kselftest-watchdog * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * perf * rcutorture
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
-
Florian Fainelli -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Shuah Khan -
Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)