This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.108 release. There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:32:09 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.108-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.108-rc1
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Revert "selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_timer overwriting crash"
Steffen Klassert steffen.klassert@secunet.com esp: Fix possible buffer overflow in ESP transformation
Fabio Estevam festevam@denx.de smsc95xx: Ignore -ENODEV errors when device is unplugged
Markus Reichl m.reichl@fivetechno.de net: usb: Correct reset handling of smsc95xx
Martyn Welch martyn.welch@collabora.com net: usb: Correct PHY handling of smsc95xx
Michael Petlan mpetlan@redhat.com perf symbols: Fix symbol size calculation condition
Pavel Skripkin paskripkin@gmail.com Input: aiptek - properly check endpoint type
Matt Lupfer mlupfer@ddn.com scsi: mpt3sas: Page fault in reply q processing
Alan Stern stern@rowland.harvard.edu usb: usbtmc: Fix bug in pipe direction for control transfers
Alan Stern stern@rowland.harvard.edu usb: gadget: Fix use-after-free bug by not setting udc->dev.driver
Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com usb: gadget: rndis: prevent integer overflow in rndis_set_response()
Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de arm64: fix clang warning about TRAMP_VALIAS
Vladimir Oltean vladimir.oltean@nxp.com net: mscc: ocelot: fix backwards compatibility with single-chain tc-flower offload
Doug Berger opendmb@gmail.com net: bcmgenet: skip invalid partial checksums
Manish Chopra manishc@marvell.com bnx2x: fix built-in kernel driver load failure
Juerg Haefliger juerg.haefliger@canonical.com net: phy: mscc: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE macros
Miaoqian Lin linmq006@gmail.com net: dsa: Add missing of_node_put() in dsa_port_parse_of
Nicolas Dichtel nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com net: handle ARPHRD_PIMREG in dev_is_mac_header_xmit()
Marek Vasut marex@denx.de drm/panel: simple: Fix Innolux G070Y2-L01 BPP settings
Christoph Niedermaier cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com drm/imx: parallel-display: Remove bus flags check in imx_pd_bridge_atomic_check()
Jiasheng Jiang jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn hv_netvsc: Add check for kvmalloc_array
Jiasheng Jiang jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn atm: eni: Add check for dma_map_single
Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com net/packet: fix slab-out-of-bounds access in packet_recvmsg()
Kurt Cancemi kurt@x64architecture.com net: phy: marvell: Fix invalid comparison in the resume and suspend functions
Sabrina Dubroca sd@queasysnail.net esp6: fix check on ipv6_skip_exthdr's return value
Jiyong Park jiyong@google.com vsock: each transport cycles only on its own sockets
Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org efi: fix return value of __setup handlers
Guo Ziliang guo.ziliang@zte.com.cn mm: swap: get rid of livelock in swapin readahead
Joseph Qi joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com ocfs2: fix crash when initialize filecheck kobj fails
Brian Masney bmasney@redhat.com crypto: qcom-rng - ensure buffer for generate is completely filled
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- arch/arm64/include/asm/vectors.h | 4 +- drivers/atm/eni.c | 2 + drivers/crypto/qcom-rng.c | 17 +++-- drivers/firmware/efi/apple-properties.c | 2 +- drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.c | 8 -- drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 2 +- drivers/input/tablet/aiptek.c | 10 +-- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h | 2 - drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c | 28 ++++--- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c | 15 +--- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c | 6 +- drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c | 16 +++- drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c | 3 + drivers/net/phy/marvell.c | 8 +- drivers/net/phy/mscc/mscc_main.c | 3 + drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c | 86 ++++++++++++---------- drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c | 5 +- drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c | 13 +++- drivers/usb/gadget/function/rndis.c | 1 + drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c | 3 - drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 3 +- fs/ocfs2/super.c | 22 +++--- include/linux/if_arp.h | 1 + include/net/af_vsock.h | 3 +- include/net/esp.h | 2 + include/net/sock.h | 1 + mm/swap_state.c | 2 +- net/dsa/dsa2.c | 1 + net/ipv4/esp4.c | 5 ++ net/ipv6/esp6.c | 8 +- net/packet/af_packet.c | 11 ++- net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 9 ++- net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 7 +- net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c | 5 +- tools/perf/util/symbol.c | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_crash.c | 32 -------- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer_crash.c | 54 -------------- 39 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 216 deletions(-)
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.108 release. There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On 3/21/22 06:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.108 release. There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:32:09 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.108-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:52:30 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.108 release. There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:32:09 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.108-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.108-rc1-g9d7b0ced5647 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On 3/21/22 7:52 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.108 release. There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:32:09 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.108-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 02:52:30PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.108 release. There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:32:09 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 161 pass: 161 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:52:30 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.108 release. There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:32:09 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.108-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
5.10.108-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen foxhlchen@gmail.com
On 21/03/22 20.52, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.108 release. There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, gcc 10.2.0) and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, gcc 11.2.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya bagasdotme@gmail.com
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 19:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.108 release. There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:32:09 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.108-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.108-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: 9d7b0ced5647e0df1b200ee29119cb58ff958339 * git describe: v5.10.107-31-g9d7b0ced5647 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.105) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.105) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.105) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.105) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 99479, pass: 84962, fail: 805, skip: 12837, xfail: 875
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 296 total, 296 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 47 total, 47 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 45 total, 42 passed, 3 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 41 total, 38 passed, 3 failed * parisc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 65 total, 47 passed, 18 failed * riscv: 32 total, 29 passed, 3 failed * s390: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * sh: 26 total, 24 passed, 2 failed * sparc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 47 total, 47 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-time[ * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance * vdso
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 02:52:30PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.108 release. There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:32:09 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220314): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220314): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220314): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220314): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/924 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/928
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On 2022/3/21 21:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.108 release. There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:32:09 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.108-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.108-rc1,
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.108-rc1 Commit: 9d7b0ced5647e0df1b200ee29119cb58ff958339 Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9013 passed: 9013 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
x86: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9013 passed: 9013 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot hulkrobot@huawei.com
-
Bagas Sanjaya -
Florian Fainelli -
Fox Chen -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Pavel Machek -
Samuel Zou -
Shuah Khan -
Sudip Mukherjee