This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.175-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.4.175-rc1
Jan Kara jack@suse.cz select: Fix indefinitely sleeping task in poll_schedule_timeout()
Tim Harvey tharvey@gateworks.com mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: disable CMDQ support
Phil Elwell phil@raspberrypi.com ARM: dts: gpio-ranges property is now required
Phil Elwell phil@raspberrypi.com pinctrl: bcm2835: Change init order for gpio hogs
Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com pinctrl: bcm2835: Add support for wake-up interrupts
Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com pinctrl: bcm2835: Match BCM7211 compatible string
Stefan Wahren stefan.wahren@i2se.com pinctrl: bcm2835: Add support for all GPIOs on BCM2711
Stefan Wahren stefan.wahren@i2se.com pinctrl: bcm2835: Refactor platform data
Stefan Wahren stefan.wahren@i2se.com pinctrl: bcm2835: Drop unused define
Paul E. McKenney paulmck@kernel.org rcu: Tighten rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() checks
Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h | 3 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 10 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 99 +++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 11 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 4 + drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 3 +- drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c | 209 +++++++++++++++++++---- fs/select.c | 63 +++---- kernel/rcu/tree.c | 7 +- 13 files changed, 346 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
On 1/27/2022 10:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.175-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On 1/27/22 11:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.175-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:09:01 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.175-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.4: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 59 tests: 59 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.4.175-rc1-gaa3124a3444f Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 23:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.175-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.4.175-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.4.y * git commit: aa3124a3444fd7cfa588271ffdc7d3cb77131142 * git describe: v5.4.174-12-gaa3124a3444f * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.17...
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.173-317-gb9fb58c8fa63) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.173-317-gb9fb58c8fa63) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.4.173-317-gb9fb58c8fa63) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.173-317-gb9fb58c8fa63) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 60336, pass: 50071, fail: 423, skip: 9268, xfail: 574
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 258 total, 258 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 36 total, 31 passed, 5 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 52 total, 48 passed, 4 failed * riscv: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:01PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/665
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:01PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release. There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 157 pass: 157 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 449 pass: 449 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter