This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.128-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.128-rc1
Vladimir Oltean vladimir.oltean@nxp.com net: mscc: ocelot: allow unregistered IP multicast flooding
Naveen N. Rao naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com powerpc/ftrace: Remove ftrace init tramp once kernel init is complete
Dave Chinner dchinner@redhat.com xfs: check sb_meta_uuid for dabuf buffer recovery
Darrick J. Wong djwong@kernel.org xfs: remove all COW fork extents when remounting readonly
Yang Xu xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com xfs: Fix the free logic of state in xfs_attr_node_hasname
Brian Foster bfoster@redhat.com xfs: punch out data fork delalloc blocks on COW writeback failure
Rustam Kovhaev rkovhaev@gmail.com xfs: use kmem_cache_free() for kmem_cache objects
Coly Li colyli@suse.de bcache: memset on stack variables in bch_btree_check() and bch_sectors_dirty_init()
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org clocksource/drivers/ixp4xx: remove __init from ixp4xx_timer_setup()
Masahiro Yamada masahiroy@kernel.org tick/nohz: unexport __init-annotated tick_nohz_full_setup()
Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de drm: remove drm_fb_helper_modinit
Amir Goldstein amir73il@gmail.com MAINTAINERS: add Amir as xfs maintainer for 5.10.y
-------------
Diffstat:
MAINTAINERS | 3 ++- Makefile | 4 ++-- arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h | 4 +++- arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 2 ++ drivers/clocksource/mmio.c | 2 +- drivers/clocksource/timer-ixp4xx.c | 10 ++++------ drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper_internal.h | 10 ---------- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 21 --------------------- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_kms_helper_common.c | 25 ++++++++++++------------- drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 1 + drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c | 8 ++++++-- fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c | 13 +++++-------- fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item_recover.c | 2 +- fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c | 6 +++--- fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 14 +++++++++++--- include/linux/platform_data/timer-ixp4xx.h | 5 ++--- kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 1 - 20 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 15:47:05 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.128-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.128-rc1-g929b4759e471 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On 6/30/2022 6:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.128-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On 6/30/22 7:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.128-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:05PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 163 pass: 163 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On 2022/6/30 21:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.128-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.128-rc1,
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.128-rc1 Commit: 929b4759e471d567a6993b953bb85c5bb9f8fa7e Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9093 passed: 9093 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
x86: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9093 passed: 9093 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot hulkrobot@huawei.com
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 at 19:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.128-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.128-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: 929b4759e471d567a6993b953bb85c5bb9f8fa7e * git describe: v5.10.127-13-g929b4759e471 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.127) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.127) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.127) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.127) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 127248, pass: 114167, fail: 259, skip: 12135, xfail: 687
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 308 total, 308 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 62 total, 62 passed, 0 failed * i386: 52 total, 49 passed, 3 failed * mips: 48 total, 48 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 51 total, 51 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * s390: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 56 total, 55 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance * vdso
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:05PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220627): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1429 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1436
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
-
Florian Fainelli -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Pavel Machek -
Samuel Zou -
Shuah Khan -
Sudip Mukherjee