This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.219 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:46 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.219-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.4.219-rc1
Johannes Berg johannes.berg@intel.com wifi: mac80211: fix MBSSID parsing use-after-free
Johannes Berg johannes.berg@intel.com wifi: mac80211: don't parse mbssid in assoc response
Johannes Berg johannes.berg@intel.com mac80211: mlme: find auth challenge directly
Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Revert "fs: check FMODE_LSEEK to control internal pipe splicing"
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++-- fs/splice.c | 10 ++++++---- net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h | 4 ++-- net/mac80211/mlme.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- net/mac80211/scan.c | 2 ++ net/mac80211/util.c | 11 ++++++----- 6 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 08:46:22AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.219 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:46 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 161 pass: 161 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 447 pass: 447 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 at 12:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.219 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:46 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.219-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro's test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.4.219-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.4.y * git commit: 5a1de46f7e7462992a5dd980fe8d06ea57b4ad17 * git describe: v5.4.218-5-g5a1de46f7e74 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.21...
## No Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.217-39-g34b618a713e7)
## No Metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.217-39-g34b618a713e7)
## No Test Fixes (compared to v5.4.217-39-g34b618a713e7)
## No Metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.217-39-g34b618a713e7)
## Test result summary total: 99448, pass: 84788, fail: 1219, skip: 12965, xfail: 476
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 334 total, 334 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 64 total, 59 passed, 5 failed * i386: 31 total, 29 passed, 2 failed * mips: 56 total, 56 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 63 total, 63 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 27 total, 26 passed, 1 failed * s390: 15 total, 15 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 57 total, 55 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-net-forwarding * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression * rcutorture * v4l2-compliance * vdso
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 08:46:22AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.219 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:46 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220925): mips: 65 configs -> no failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2009
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 08:46:22 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.219 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:46 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.219-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.4: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 59 tests: 59 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.4.219-rc1-g5a1de46f7e74 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On 10/15/22 23:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.219 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:46 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.219-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On 10/16/22 00:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.219 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:46 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.219-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah