This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.160-rc1
Lei Rao lei.rao@intel.com nvme-pci: clear the prp2 field when not used
Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com ASoC: cs42l51: Correct PGA Volume minimum value
Yasushi SHOJI yasushi.shoji@gmail.com can: mcba_usb: Fix termination command argument
Heiko Schocher hs@denx.de can: sja1000: fix size of OCR_MODE_MASK define
Ricardo Ribalda ribalda@chromium.org pinctrl: meditatek: Startup with the IRQs disabled
Hou Tao houtao1@huawei.com libbpf: Use page size as max_entries when probing ring buffer map
Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org ASoC: ops: Check bounds for second channel in snd_soc_put_volsw_sx()
Shengjiu Wang shengjiu.wang@nxp.com ASoC: fsl_micfil: explicitly clear CHnF flags
Shengjiu Wang shengjiu.wang@nxp.com ASoC: fsl_micfil: explicitly clear software reset bit
Bing-Jhong Billy Jheng billy@starlabs.sg io_uring: add missing item types for splice request
Miklos Szeredi mszeredi@redhat.com fuse: always revalidate if exclusive create
Jialiang Wang wangjialiang0806@163.com nfp: fix use-after-free in area_cache_get()
Amir Goldstein amir73il@gmail.com vfs: fix copy_file_range() averts filesystem freeze protection
Amir Goldstein amir73il@gmail.com vfs: fix copy_file_range() regression in cross-fs copies
Paul E. McKenney paulmck@kernel.org x86/smpboot: Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c | 2 - arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 1 + drivers/net/can/usb/mcba_usb.c | 10 ++- .../ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_cppcore.c | 3 +- drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 2 + drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c | 9 ++- fs/fuse/dir.c | 2 +- fs/io_uring.c | 2 +- fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 8 +- fs/read_write.c | 90 +++++++++++++--------- include/linux/can/platform/sja1000.h | 2 +- include/linux/fs.h | 8 ++ sound/soc/codecs/cs42l51.c | 2 +- sound/soc/fsl/fsl_micfil.c | 19 +++++ sound/soc/soc-ops.c | 6 ++ tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c | 2 +- 17 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On 12/15/22 11:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg,
5.10.160-rc1 tested.
Run tested on: - Intel Skylake x86_64 (nuc6 i5-6260U)
In addition - build tested for: - Allwinner A64 - Allwinner H3 - Allwinner H5 - Allwinner H6 - Rockchip RK3288 - Rockchip RK3328 - Rockchip RK3399pro
Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum rudi@heitbaum.com -- Rudi
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or regressions.
Tested-by: Allen Pais apais@linux.microsoft.com
Thanks.
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.160-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: a66782e1af759c5fff50b1b382ff4e34fe8fe158 * git describe: v5.10.159-16-ga66782e1af75 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.158-99-g2c8c8e98b2ec)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.158-99-g2c8c8e98b2ec)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.158-99-g2c8c8e98b2ec)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.158-99-g2c8c8e98b2ec)
## Test result summary total: 141503, pass: 122877, fail: 2557, skip: 15573, xfail: 496
## Build Summary * arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed * arm: 151 total, 148 passed, 3 failed * arm64: 49 total, 46 passed, 3 failed * i386: 39 total, 37 passed, 2 failed * mips: 31 total, 29 passed, 2 failed * parisc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 32 total, 25 passed, 7 failed * riscv: 16 total, 14 passed, 2 failed * s390: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed * sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed * sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 42 total, 40 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary * boot * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-net-forwarding * kselftest-net-mptcp * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression * rcutorture * v4l2-compliance * vdso
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 19:10:27 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 11 builds: 11 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.160-rc1-ga66782e1af75 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221127): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2362 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2366
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
On 12/15/22 10:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 162 pass: 162 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 475 pass: 475 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On 2022/12/16 2:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.160-rc1,
Kernel repo:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.160-rc1 Commit: a66782e1af759c5fff50b1b382ff4e34fe8fe158 Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9023 passed: 9023 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
x86: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9023 passed: 9023 failed: 0 timeout: 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Tested-by: Hulk Robot hulkrobot@huawei.com
-
Allen Pais -
Florian Fainelli -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Pavel Machek -
Rudi Heitbaum -
Shuah Khan -
Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) -
zhouzhixiu