This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.81 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Nov 2021 17:14:35 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.81-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.81-rc1
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy quic_subbaram@quicinc.com thermal: Fix NULL pointer dereferences in of_thermal_ functions
Greg Thelen gthelen@google.com perf/core: Avoid put_page() when GUP fails
Nathan Chancellor nathan@kernel.org scripts/lld-version.sh: Rewrite based on upstream ld-version.sh
Gao Xiang hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com erofs: fix unsafe pagevec reuse of hooked pclusters
Yue Hu huyue2@yulong.com erofs: remove the occupied parameter from z_erofs_pagevec_enqueue()
Marc Zyngier maz@kernel.org PCI: Add MSI masking quirk for Nvidia ION AHCI
Marc Zyngier maz@kernel.org PCI/MSI: Deal with devices lying about their MSI mask capability
Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de PCI/MSI: Destroy sysfs before freeing entries
Sven Schnelle svens@stackframe.org parisc/entry: fix trace test in syscall exit path
Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org x86/iopl: Fake iopl(3) CLI/STI usage
Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com arm64: vdso32: suppress error message for 'make mrproper'
Michael Riesch michael.riesch@wolfvision.net net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable warnings
Wong Vee Khee vee.khee.wong@linux.intel.com net: stmmac: fix issue where clk is being unprepared twice
Joakim Zhang qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com net: stmmac: fix system hang if change mac address after interface ifdown
Yang Yingliang yangyingliang@huawei.com net: stmmac: fix missing unlock on error in stmmac_suspend()
Wei Yongjun weiyongjun1@huawei.com net: stmmac: platform: fix build error with !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
Joakim Zhang qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com net: stmmac: add clocks management for gmac driver
Masami Hiramatsu mhiramat@kernel.org bootconfig: init: Fix memblock leak in xbc_make_cmdline()
Xie Yongji xieyongji@bytedance.com loop: Use blk_validate_block_size() to validate block size
Xie Yongji xieyongji@bytedance.com block: Add a helper to validate the block size
Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org fortify: Explicitly disable Clang support
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile | 3 +- arch/parisc/kernel/entry.S | 2 +- arch/x86/include/asm/insn-eval.h | 1 + arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 34 +++++++ arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c | 2 +- drivers/block/loop.c | 17 +--- drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c | 9 -- drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 87 ++++++++++++++-- drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++----- .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c | 30 ++++-- drivers/pci/msi.c | 27 ++--- drivers/pci/quirks.c | 6 ++ drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c | 9 +- fs/erofs/zdata.c | 15 ++- fs/erofs/zpvec.h | 14 ++- include/linux/blkdev.h | 8 ++ include/linux/pci.h | 2 + init/main.c | 1 + kernel/events/core.c | 10 +- scripts/lld-version.sh | 35 +++++-- security/Kconfig | 3 + 25 files changed, 320 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
On 11/19/21 9:37 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.81 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Nov 2021 17:14:35 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.81-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 18:37:35 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.81 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Nov 2021 17:14:35 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.81-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
5.10.81-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen foxhlchen@gmail.com
On 11/19/21 10:37 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.81 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Nov 2021 17:14:35 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.81-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.81 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 06:37:35PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.81 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Nov 2021 17:14:35 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/410 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/409
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
Hello!
On 11/19/21 11:37 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.81 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Nov 2021 17:14:35 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.81-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.81-rc1
[...]> Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org
x86/iopl: Fake iopl(3) CLI/STI usage
[...]
Results from Linaro's test farm. Regressions found on x86_64 and i386, on iopl. Here's an excerpt of the selftest:
[ 0.000000] Linux version 5.10.81-rc1 (oe-user@oe-host) (x86_64-linaro-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.3.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.30.0.20180208) #1 SMP Fri Nov 19 19:48:55 UTC 2021 [...] [ 170.351838] traps: iopl_64[2769] attempts to use CLI/STI, pretending it's a NOP, ip:400dde in iopl_64[400000+2000] [...] # selftests: x86: iopl_64 # [FAIL] CLI worked # [FAIL] STI worked # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked # [OK] outb to 0xed failed # child: set IOPL to 3 # [RUN] child: write to 0x80 # [FAIL] CLI worked # [FAIL] STI worked # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked # [OK] outb to 0xed failed # [OK] Child succeeded # [RUN] parent: write to 0x80 (should fail) # [OK] outb to 0x80 failed # [OK] CLI faulted # [OK] STI faulted # iopl(3) # Drop privileges # [RUN] iopl(3) unprivileged but with IOPL==3 # [RUN] iopl(0) unprivileged # [RUN] iopl(3) unprivileged # [OK] Failed as expected not ok 7 selftests: x86: iopl_64 # exit=1
The baseline kernel (v5.10.80) exhibited this output: # selftests: x86: iopl_64 # [OK] CLI faulted # [OK] STI faulted # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked # [OK] outb to 0xed failed # child: set IOPL to 3 # [RUN] child: write to 0x80 # [OK] CLI faulted # [OK] STI faulted # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked # [OK] outb to 0xed failed # [OK] Child succeeded # [RUN] parent: write to 0x80 (should fail) # [OK] outb to 0x80 failed # [OK] CLI faulted # [OK] STI faulted # iopl(3) # Drop privileges # [RUN] iopl(3) unprivileged but with IOPL==3 # [RUN] iopl(0) unprivileged # [RUN] iopl(3) unprivileged # [OK] Failed as expected ok 7 selftests: x86: iopl_64
## Build * kernel: 5.10.81-rc1 * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc'] * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: ed689bd1df46a07911fffa509cd06c5ec7beb9c1 * git describe: v5.10.80-22-ged689bd1df46 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Regressions (compared to v5.10.80) * i386, kselftest-x86 - x86.iopl_32
* qemu_x86_64, kselftest-x86 - x86.iopl_64
* x86, kselftest-x86 - x86.iopl_64
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## No fixes (compared to v5.10.80)
## Test result summary total: 91125, pass: 77560, fail: 574, skip: 12243, xfail: 748
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 54 total, 46 passed, 8 failed * riscv: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
Greetings!
Daniel Díaz daniel.diaz@linaro.org
+ Peter Zijlstra + Thomas Gleixner + Borislav Petkov + Ondrej Zary
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 20:57, Daniel Díaz daniel.diaz@linaro.org wrote:
Hello!
On 11/19/21 11:37 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.81 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Nov 2021 17:14:35 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.81-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.81-rc1
[...]> Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org
x86/iopl: Fake iopl(3) CLI/STI usage
This is due to ^ new kernel code + old test case (Test case needs to be updated)
[...]
Results from Linaro's test farm. Regressions found on x86_64 and i386, on iopl. Here's an excerpt of the selftest:
[ 0.000000] Linux version 5.10.81-rc1 (oe-user@oe-host) (x86_64-linaro-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.3.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.30.0.20180208) #1 SMP Fri Nov 19 19:48:55 UTC 2021 [...] [ 170.351838] traps: iopl_64[2769] attempts to use CLI/STI, pretending it's a NOP, ip:400dde in iopl_64[400000+2000] [...] # selftests: x86: iopl_64 # [FAIL] CLI worked # [FAIL] STI worked
This failure was detected on linux next and the later test case has been fixed. The Following patch could fix this problem across 5.10, 5.14 and 5.15.
Patch details, --- selftests/x86/iopl: Adjust to the faked iopl CLI/STI usage
Commit in Fixes changed the iopl emulation to not #GP on CLI and STI because it would break some insane luserspace tools which would toggle interrupts.
The corresponding selftest would rely on the fact that executing CLI/STI would trigger a #GP and thus detect it this way but since that #GP is not happening anymore, the detection is now wrong too.
Extend the test to actually look at the IF flag and whether executing those insns had any effect on it. The STI detection needs to have the fact that interrupts were previously disabled, passed in so do that from the previous CLI test, i.e., STI test needs to follow a previous CLI one for it to make sense.
Fixes: b968e84b509d ("x86/iopl: Fake iopl(3) CLI/STI usage") Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov bp@suse.de Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211030083939.13073-1-bp@alien8.de
# [OK] outb to 0x80 worked # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked # [OK] outb to 0xed failed # child: set IOPL to 3 # [RUN] child: write to 0x80 # [FAIL] CLI worked # [FAIL] STI worked # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked # [OK] outb to 0xed failed # [OK] Child succeeded # [RUN] parent: write to 0x80 (should fail) # [OK] outb to 0x80 failed # [OK] CLI faulted # [OK] STI faulted # iopl(3) # Drop privileges # [RUN] iopl(3) unprivileged but with IOPL==3 # [RUN] iopl(0) unprivileged # [RUN] iopl(3) unprivileged # [OK] Failed as expected not ok 7 selftests: x86: iopl_64 # exit=1
The baseline kernel (v5.10.80) exhibited this output: # selftests: x86: iopl_64 # [OK] CLI faulted # [OK] STI faulted # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked # [OK] outb to 0xed failed # child: set IOPL to 3 # [RUN] child: write to 0x80 # [OK] CLI faulted # [OK] STI faulted # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked # [OK] outb to 0x80 worked # [OK] outb to 0xed failed # [OK] Child succeeded # [RUN] parent: write to 0x80 (should fail) # [OK] outb to 0x80 failed # [OK] CLI faulted # [OK] STI faulted # iopl(3) # Drop privileges # [RUN] iopl(3) unprivileged but with IOPL==3 # [RUN] iopl(0) unprivileged # [RUN] iopl(3) unprivileged # [OK] Failed as expected ok 7 selftests: x86: iopl_64
## Build
- kernel: 5.10.81-rc1
- git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc']
- git branch: linux-5.10.y
- git commit: ed689bd1df46a07911fffa509cd06c5ec7beb9c1
- git describe: v5.10.80-22-ged689bd1df46
- test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Regressions (compared to v5.10.80)
i386, kselftest-x86
- x86.iopl_32
qemu_x86_64, kselftest-x86
- x86.iopl_64
x86, kselftest-x86
- x86.iopl_64
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## No fixes (compared to v5.10.80)
## Test result summary total: 91125, pass: 77560, fail: 574, skip: 12243, xfail: 748
## Build Summary
- arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
- arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed
- arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
- dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
- hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
- i386: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
- juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
- mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
- parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
- powerpc: 54 total, 46 passed, 8 failed
- riscv: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
- s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
- sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
- sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
- x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
- x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
- x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
- fwts
- igt-gpu-tools
- kselftest-android
- kselftest-bpf
- kselftest-breakpoints
- kselftest-capabilities
- kselftest-cgroup
- kselftest-clone3
- kselftest-core
- kselftest-cpu-hotplug
- kselftest-cpufreq
- kselftest-drivers
- kselftest-efivarfs
- kselftest-filesystems
- kselftest-firmware
- kselftest-fpu
- kselftest-futex
- kselftest-gpio
- kselftest-intel_pstate
- kselftest-ipc
- kselftest-ir
- kselftest-kcmp
- kselftest-kexec
- kselftest-kvm
- kselftest-lib
- kselftest-livepatch
- kselftest-membarrier
- kselftest-memfd
- kselftest-memory-hotplug
- kselftest-mincore
- kselftest-mount
- kselftest-mqueue
- kselftest-net
- kselftest-netfilter
- kselftest-nsfs
- kselftest-openat2
- kselftest-pid_namespace
- kselftest-pidfd
- kselftest-proc
- kselftest-pstore
- kselftest-ptrace
- kselftest-rseq
- kselftest-rtc
- kselftest-seccomp
- kselftest-sigaltstack
- kselftest-size
- kselftest-splice
- kselftest-static_keys
- kselftest-sync
- kselftest-sysctl
- kselftest-tc-testing
- kselftest-timens
- kselftest-timers
- kselftest-tmpfs
- kselftest-tpm2
- kselftest-user
- kselftest-vm
- kselftest-x86
- kselftest-zram
- kunit
- kvm-unit-tests
- libgpiod
- libhugetlbfs
- linux-log-parser
- ltp-cap_bounds-tests
- ltp-commands-tests
- ltp-containers-tests
- ltp-controllers-tests
- ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
- ltp-crypto-tests
- ltp-cve-tests
- ltp-dio-tests
- ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
- ltp-filecaps-tests
- ltp-fs-tests
- ltp-fs_bind-tests
- ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
- ltp-fsx-tests
- ltp-hugetlb-tests
- ltp-io-tests
- ltp-ipc-tests
- ltp-math-tests
- ltp-mm-tests
- ltp-nptl-tests
- ltp-open-posix-tests
- ltp-pty-tests
- ltp-sched-tests
- ltp-securebits-tests
- ltp-syscalls-tests
- ltp-tracing-tests
- network-basic-tests
- packetdrill
- perf
- rcutorture
- ssuite
- v4l2-compliance
Greetings!
Daniel Díaz daniel.diaz@linaro.org
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 09:36:55PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
- Peter Zijlstra
- Thomas Gleixner
- Borislav Petkov
- Ondrej Zary
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 20:57, Daniel Díaz daniel.diaz@linaro.org wrote:
Hello!
On 11/19/21 11:37 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.81 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Nov 2021 17:14:35 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.81-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.81-rc1
[...]> Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org
x86/iopl: Fake iopl(3) CLI/STI usageThis is due to ^ new kernel code + old test case (Test case needs to be updated)
[...]
Results from Linaro's test farm. Regressions found on x86_64 and i386, on iopl. Here's an excerpt of the selftest:
[ 0.000000] Linux version 5.10.81-rc1 (oe-user@oe-host) (x86_64-linaro-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.3.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.30.0.20180208) #1 SMP Fri Nov 19 19:48:55 UTC 2021 [...] [ 170.351838] traps: iopl_64[2769] attempts to use CLI/STI, pretending it's a NOP, ip:400dde in iopl_64[400000+2000] [...] # selftests: x86: iopl_64 # [FAIL] CLI worked # [FAIL] STI worked
This failure was detected on linux next and the later test case has been fixed. The Following patch could fix this problem across 5.10, 5.14 and 5.15.
Patch details,
selftests/x86/iopl: Adjust to the faked iopl CLI/STI usage
Commit in Fixes changed the iopl emulation to not #GP on CLI and STI because it would break some insane luserspace tools which would toggle interrupts.
The corresponding selftest would rely on the fact that executing CLI/STI would trigger a #GP and thus detect it this way but since that #GP is not happening anymore, the detection is now wrong too.
Extend the test to actually look at the IF flag and whether executing those insns had any effect on it. The STI detection needs to have the fact that interrupts were previously disabled, passed in so do that from the previous CLI test, i.e., STI test needs to follow a previous CLI one for it to make sense.
Fixes: b968e84b509d ("x86/iopl: Fake iopl(3) CLI/STI usage") Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov bp@suse.de Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211030083939.13073-1-bp@alien8.de
Now queued up, thanks,
greg k-h
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 06:37:35PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.81 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Nov 2021 17:14:35 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 474 pass: 474 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On 2021/11/20 1:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.81 release. There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Nov 2021 17:14:35 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.81-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.81-rc1,
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.81-rc1 Commit: ed689bd1df46a07911fffa509cd06c5ec7beb9c1 Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9019 passed: 9019 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
x86: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9019 passed: 9019 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot hulkrobot@huawei.com
-
Daniel Díaz -
Florian Fainelli -
Fox Chen -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Naresh Kamboju -
Pavel Machek -
Samuel Zou -
Shuah Khan -
Sudip Mukherjee