This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.100-rc1
Herbert Xu herbert@gondor.apana.org.au crypto: api - Move cryptomgr soft dependency into algapi
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch scgl@linux.ibm.com KVM: s390: Return error on SIDA memop on normal guest
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++-- arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 ++ crypto/algapi.c | 1 + crypto/api.c | 1 - drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any new kernel problems here (but we still hit the gmp.h compilation issue):
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On 2/9/22 12:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 20:14:18 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.100-rc1-gf1b074cc52b4 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 00:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.100-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: f1b074cc52b4cb5f2f78985508ae344e6f066252 * git describe: v5.10.98-79-gf1b074cc52b4 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 76874, pass: 66765, fail: 223, skip: 9288, xfail: 598
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed * i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed * mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/734 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/738
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On 2/9/2022 11:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 161 pass: 161 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On 2022/2/10 3:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.100-rc1,
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.100-rc1 Commit: f1b074cc52b4cb5f2f78985508ae344e6f066252 Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9013 passed: 9013 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
x86: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9013 passed: 9013 failed: 0 timeout: 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot hulkrobot@huawei.com
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, at 2:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Compiled and booted 5.10.100-rc1 on my x86_64 test system successfully without errors or regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins slade@sladewatkins.com
Thanks, Slade
-
Florian Fainelli -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Pavel Machek -
Samuel Zou -
Shuah Khan -
Slade Watkins -
Sudip Mukherjee