This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.309-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 4.9.309-rc1
Linus Lüssing ll@simonwunderlich.de mac80211: fix potential double free on mesh join
Giovanni Cabiddu giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com crypto: qat - disable registration of algorithms
Werner Sembach wse@tuxedocomputers.com ACPI: video: Force backlight native for Clevo NL5xRU and NL5xNU
Maximilian Luz luzmaximilian@gmail.com ACPI: battery: Add device HID and quirk for Microsoft Surface Go 3
Mark Cilissen mark@yotsuba.nl ACPI / x86: Work around broken XSDT on Advantech DAC-BJ01 board
Pablo Neira Ayuso pablo@netfilter.org netfilter: nf_tables: initialize registers in nft_do_chain()
Giacomo Guiduzzi guiduzzi.giacomo@gmail.com ALSA: pci: fix reading of swapped values from pcmreg in AC97 codec
Jonathan Teh jonathan.teh@outlook.com ALSA: cmipci: Restore aux vol on suspend/resume
Lars-Peter Clausen lars@metafoo.de ALSA: usb-audio: Add mute TLV for playback volumes on RODE NT-USB
Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de ALSA: pcm: Add stream lock during PCM reset ioctl operations
Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com llc: fix netdevice reference leaks in llc_ui_bind()
Oliver Graute oliver.graute@kococonnector.com staging: fbtft: fb_st7789v: reset display before initialization
Tadeusz Struk tadeusz.struk@linaro.org net: ipv6: fix skb_over_panic in __ip6_append_data
Jordy Zomer jordy@pwning.systems nfc: st21nfca: Fix potential buffer overflows in EVT_TRANSACTION
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 24 ++++++++++ drivers/acpi/battery.c | 12 +++++ drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_crypto.c | 8 ++++ drivers/nfc/st21nfca/se.c | 10 ++++ drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_st7789v.c | 2 + net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 4 +- net/llc/af_llc.c | 8 ++++ net/mac80211/cfg.c | 3 -- net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c | 2 +- sound/core/pcm_native.c | 4 ++ sound/pci/ac97/ac97_codec.c | 4 +- sound/pci/cmipci.c | 3 +- sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c | 7 +-- 15 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-4...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On 3/25/22 08:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.309-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
PS: is there any reason why the Spectre BHB patches from here are not part of linux-stable/linux-4.9.y?
On 3/25/22 14:31, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 3/25/22 08:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.309-rc1...
or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
PS: is there any reason why the Spectre BHB patches from here are not part of linux-stable/linux-4.9.y?
Meant to provide this link, from here:
https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-jm/-/tree/bhb/v3/v4.9.302
Hi Florian,
On 26/03/2022 00:00, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 3/25/22 14:31, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 3/25/22 08:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.309-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
PS: is there any reason why the Spectre BHB patches from here are not part of linux-stable/linux-4.9.y?
Meant to provide this link, from here:
https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-jm/-/tree/bhb/v3/v4.9.302
These were from before the disclosure date. Since then the 'backport everything' approach was investigated more, but we decided not to go that way. These trees need the bugs we subsequently discovered fixing, retesting and reposting. I was on holiday last week. I plan to get to it this week.
Thanks,
James
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 02:31:59PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 3/25/22 08:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.309-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
PS: is there any reason why the Spectre BHB patches from here are not part of linux-stable/linux-4.9.y?
Because they were not submitted for inclusion :(
On 3/25/22 9:04 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.309-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 at 20:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.309-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 4.9.309-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-4.9.y * git commit: ebc053b844b704373fb74ff8f019e29785bed7e9 * git describe: v4.9.308-15-gebc053b844b7 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.9.y/build/v4.9.30...
## Test Regressions (compared to v4.9.308) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.9.308) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v4.9.308) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.9.308) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 60629, pass: 47943, fail: 552, skip: 10058, xfail: 2076
## Build Summary * arm: 254 total, 238 passed, 16 failed * arm64: 32 total, 32 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 19 total, 19 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * ssuite * v4l2-compliance * vdso
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 04:04:28PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 163 pass: 163 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 397 pass: 397 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 16:04:28 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release. There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.309-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v4.9: 8 builds: 8 pass, 0 fail 16 boots: 16 pass, 0 fail 32 tests: 32 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 4.9.309-rc1-gebc053b844b7 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon