This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.34 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 02 May 2021 14:19:04 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.34-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.34-rc1
Tomas Winkler tomas.winkler@intel.com mei: me: add Alder Lake P device id.
Jiri Kosina jkosina@suse.cz iwlwifi: Fix softirq/hardirq disabling in iwl_pcie_gen2_enqueue_hcmd()
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++-- drivers/misc/mei/hw-me-regs.h | 1 + drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c | 1 + drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/tx-gen2.c | 7 ++++--- 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:20:41 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.34 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 02 May 2021 14:19:04 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.34-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
5.10.34-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen foxhlchen@gmail.com
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:20:41 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.34 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 02 May 2021 14:19:04 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.34-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 12 builds: 12 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 70 tests: 70 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.34-rc1-g9fe3189f108d Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.34 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 04:20:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.34 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 02 May 2021 14:19:04 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210430): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210430): 105 configs -> no new failure x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 2 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. arm: Booted on rpi3b. No regression.
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On 4/30/2021 7:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.34 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 02 May 2021 14:19:04 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.34-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 19:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.34 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 02 May 2021 14:19:04 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.34-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.34-rc1 * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: 9fe3189f108d04763059a2dc87e213f4e2064ec6 * git describe: v5.10.33-3-g9fe3189f108d * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## No regressions (compared to v5.10.33)
## No Fixes (compared to v5.10.33)
## Test result summary total: 78188, pass: 63866, fail: 3046, skip: 11021, xfail: 255,
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 193 total, 193 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 27 total, 26 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 04:20:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.34 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 02 May 2021 14:19:04 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 455 pass: 455 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
-
Florian Fainelli -
Fox Chen -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Pavel Machek -
Sudip Mukherjee